Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Urology / 2021 / Cilt: 47 - Sayı: 2

Sexual function outcomes and risk factors of erectile dysfunction after surgical repair of penile fracture

Sayfa
106–112
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The main predictors of postsurgical ED are increasing age (>50 years) and bilateral corporal involvement.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: To determine the erectile dysfunction (ED), overall sexual function, and risk factors for developing ED after surgical repair of penile fracture.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Material and methods: This was an ambispective observational study conducted from September 2014 to August 2019, which included 68 patients with a clinical diagnosis of penile fracture.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The main predictors of postsurgical ED are increasing age (>50 years) and bilateral corporal involvement.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:2014 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Objective: To determine the erectile dysfunction (ED), overall sexual function, and risk factors for developing ED after surgical repair of penile fracture. Material and methods: This was an ambispective observational study conducted from September 2014 to August 2019, which included 68 patients with a clinical diagnosis of penile fracture. The clinical presentation, etiology, and surgical details were recorded. Patients were contacted via telephone and called for follow-up. Their sexual function was objectively recorded using the sexual health inventory for men questionnaire, erection hardness grading scale, and the brief male sexual function inventory (BMSFI). Patients were categorized in 2 groups on the basis of ED. These 2 groups were compared on the basis of preoperative and intraoperative factors to determine the predictors of postoperative ED. Results: The mean age at presentation was 33.64±9.46 (range, 19–54) years. The most common mode of injury was injury during the sexual intercourse (78%). All the patients underwent surgical exploration through subcoronal degloving incision. On follow-up, 7 patients (11.3%) developed ED (mild ED, 5 patients; mild-tomoderate ED, 2 patients). Per BMSFI, 58 (93.5%) patients had no bothersome issues with their sexual life, and they were mostly satisfied. The significant risk factors for ED were age >50 years and bilateral corporal involvement. Conclusion: Penile fracture is a true urological emergency, and prompt diagnosis by clinical acumen and emergent surgical exploration provide good functional results with low morbidity. The main predictors of postsurgical ED are increasing age (>50 years) and bilateral corporal involvement.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

SHARMA, G., MANDAL, S., BHOWMİK, P., GUPTA, P., BAHAL, B., SHARMA, P. K. (2021). Sexual function outcomes and risk factors of erectile dysfunction after surgical repair of penile fracture. Turkish Journal of Urology, Cilt: 47 - Sayı: 2, 106–112. https://ajindex.com/articles/404224

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (16)

  1. Mazaris EM, Livadas K, Chalikopoulos D, Bisas A, Deliveliotis C, Skolarikos A. Penile fractures: immediate surgical approach with a midline ventral incision. BJU Int 2009
  2. [Crossref] 2. Amer T, Wilson R, Chlosta P, AlBuheissi S, Qazi H, Fraser M, et al. Penile fracture: A meta-analysis. Urol Int 2016
  3. [Crossref] 3. Eke N. Fracture of the penis. Br J Surg 2002
  4. [Crossref] 4. Zargooshi J. Sexual function and tunica albuginea wound healing following penile fracture: An 18-year follow-up study of 352 patients from Kermanshah, Iran. J Sex Med 2009
  5. [Crossref] 5. Ateyah A, Mostafa T, Nasser TA, Shaeer O, Hadi AA, Al-Gabbar MA. Penile fracture: surgical repair and late effects on erectile function. J Sex Med 2008
  6. [Crossref] 6. Pruthi RS, Petrus CD, Nidess R, Venable DD. Penile fracture of the proximal corporeal body. J Urol 2000
  7. [Crossref] 7. Abolyosr A, Moneim AE, Abdelatif AM, Abdalla MA, Imam HM. The management of penile fracture based on clinical and magnetic resonance imaging findings. BJU Int 2005
  8. [Crossref] 8. Muentener M, Suter S, Hauri D, Sulser T. Long-term experience with surgical and conservative treatment of penile fracture. J Urol 2004
  9. [Crossref] 9. Gamal WM, Osman MM, Hammady A, Aldahshoury MZ, Hussein MM, Saleem M. Penile fracture: long-term results of surgical and conservative management. J Trauma 2011
  10. [Crossref] 10. Ralph D, Gonzalez-Cadavid N, Mirone V, Perovic S, Sohn M, Usta M, et al. Trauma, gender reassignment, and penile augmentation. J Sex Med 2010
  11. [Crossref] 11. Rosen RC, Cappelleri JC, Smith MD, Lipsky J, Pena BM. Development and evaluation of an abridged, 5-item version of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) as a diagnostic tool for erectile dysfunction. Int J Impot Res 1999
  12. [Crossref] 12. Mulhall JP, Goldstein I, Bushmakin AG, Cappelleri JC, Hvidsten K. Validation of the erection hardness score. J Sex Med 2007
  13. [Crossref] 13. O’Leary MP, Fowler FJ, Lenderking WR, Barber B, Sagnier PP, Guess HA, et al. A brief male sexual function inventory in urology. Urology 1995
  14. [Crossref] 14. Patel U, Lees WR. Pharmacological testing: Doppler. In: Carson CC, Kirby R, Goldstein I, editors. Text Book of Erectile Dysfunction, 1st edn. Ibis Medical Media: Oxford
  15. p.31-4. 15. Malis J, Zur K. Der fractura penis. Arch Klin Chir 1924
  16. Penson DF, Seftel AD, Krane RJ, Frohrib D, Goldst