Dergiler / Turkish archives of otorhinolaryngology / 2021 / Cilt: 59 - Sayı: 2

Free Flap Reconstruction of the Head and Neck Region: A Series of 127 Flaps Performed by Otolaryngologists

Sayfa
103–110
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

These results show that successful outcomes can be achieved with experience and a head and neck team dedicated to improving the results in microsurgical reconstruction, and flap failure rarely occurs if perioperative care of the patients is given meticulously.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: To determine flap success rate and complications in patients who underwent microvascular free tissue reconstruction after major head and neck ablative surgery and to report the improvement in the results.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Methods: Medical records of 124 patients who were operated on in 2012 to 2019 were retrospectively reviewed.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:These results show that successful outcomes can be achieved with experience and a head and neck team dedicated to improving the results in microsurgical reconstruction, and flap failure rarely occurs if perioperative care of the patients is given meticulously.
🔬Tür:Literatür & Derleme Çalışması
📍Kapsam:2012 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Objective: To determine flap success rate and complications in patients who underwent microvascular free tissue reconstruction after major head and neck ablative surgery and to report the improvement in the results. Methods: Medical records of 124 patients who were operated on in 2012 to 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Indications for different free flap types, success rates and re-exploration rates, donor site morbidities, and reasons for flap loss were analyzed. Patients were divided into two groups to identify the effects of the anticoagulant and the antiaggregant treatments on postoperative results. Results: There were 127 flaps in 124 patients, including two different free flaps each in three patients that were harvested and used in the same surgical session. Of the total 127 flaps, 82 (64.6%) were radial forearm flaps, 39 (30.7%) were fibula flaps, and 6 (4.7) were rectus abdominis flaps. Four patients were re-explored for flap perfusion problems, and 18 patients were re-explored for hematoma drainage (n=22/124, %17.3). The rate of hematoma and re-exploration was higher in patients who received anticoagulant and antiaggregant treatments synchronously (p=0.02). Three flaps were lost, and the overall success rate was 97.6%. Two patients died from perioperative complications. No major complications were observed at the donor site; minor complications were observed in 30 patients. Conclusion: The success rate for the 127 flaps in 124 patients were found comparable to those reported in the literature. These results show that successful outcomes can be achieved with experience and a head and neck team dedicated to improving the results in microsurgical reconstruction, and flap failure rarely occurs if perioperative care of the patients is given meticulously.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

BAŞARAN, B., ÜNSALER, S., KESİMLİ, M. C., ASLAN, İ. (2021). Free Flap Reconstruction of the Head and Neck Region: A Series of 127 Flaps Performed by Otolaryngologists. Turkish archives of otorhinolaryngology, Cilt: 59 - Sayı: 2, 103–110. https://ajindex.com/articles/403340

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (1)

  1. Pulte D, Brenner H. Changes in survival in head and neck cancers in the late 20th and early 21st century: a period analysis. Oncologist 2010; 15: 994-1001. [Crossref] 2. Zimmaro LA, Sephton SE, Siwik CJ, Phillips KM, Rebholz WN, Kraemer HC et al. Depressive symptoms predict head and neck cancer survival: examining plausible behavioral and biological pathways. Cancer 2018; 124: 1053-60. [Crossref] 3. Lydiatt WM, Moran J, Burke WJ. A review of depression in the head and neck cancer patient. Clin Adv Hematol Oncol 2009; 7: 397-403. [Crossref] 4. Hanasono MM, Matros E, Disa JJ. Important aspects of head and neck reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2014; 134: 968e-80e. [Crossref] 5. Vila PM, Rich JT, Desai SC. Defining quality in head and neck reconstruction. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2017; 157: 545-7. [Crossref] 6. Panje WR, Bardach J, Krause CJ. Reconstruction of the oral cavity with a free flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 1976; 58: 415-8. [Crossref] 7. Spiegel JH, Polat JK. Microvascular flap reconstruction by otolaryngologists: prevalence, postoperative care, and monitoring techniques. Laryngoscope 2007; 117: 485-90. [Crossref] 8. Kovatch KJ, Hanks JE, Stevens JR, Stucken CL. Current practices in microvascular reconstruction in otolaryngology-head and neck surgery. Laryngoscope 2019; 129: 138-45. [Crossref] 9. Gabrysz-Forget F, Tabet P, Rahal A, Bissada E, Christopoulos A, Ayad T. Free versus pedicled flaps for reconstruction of head and neck cancer defects: a systematic review. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2019; 48: 13. [Crossref] 10. Disa JJ, Pusic AL, Hidalgo DH, Cordeiro PG. Simplifying microvascular head and neck reconstruction: a rational approach to donor site selection. Ann Plast Surg 2001; 47: 385-9. [Crossref] 11. Rozen WM, Ashton MW, Pan WR, Kiil BJ, McClure VK, Grinsell D, et al. Anatomical variations in the harvest of anterolateral thigh flap perforators: a cadaveric and clinical study. Microsurgery 2009; 29: 16-23. [Crossref] 12. Gil Z, Abergel A, Leider-Trejo L, Khafif A, Margalit N, Amir A, et al. A comprehensive algorithm for anterior skull base reconstruction after oncological resections. Skull Base 2007; 17: 25-37. [Crossref] 13. Başaran B, Ünsaler S. Carcinoma of the posterior wall of the hypopharynx: surgical treatment with larynx preservation. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 2020: S1808-8694(20)30071-9. [Crossref] 14. Coleman SS, Anson B. Arterial patterns in the hand based upon a study of 650 specimens. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1961; 113: 409-24. [C