KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / EKEV Akademi Dergisi / 2021 / Sayı: 87

ADAPTATION OF TEACHING MATHEMATICS EFFICACY BELIEF INVENTORY (TMEBI) INTO TURKISH

MİTHAT TAKUNYACI
Sayfa
413–434
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Finally, it can be said that the MTEBI, which was adapted to the Turkish language is a valid and reliable measurement tool.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Self-efficacy in teaching mathematics can be explained as teachers’ personal beliefs about their self-efficacy beliefs in teaching mathematics and personal perceptions of their self-ability to teach mathematics to others.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Also, teachers’ attitudes, believes, and behaviors have a significant effect on students’ preparation and their academic success.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Finally, it can be said that the MTEBI, which was adapted to the Turkish language is a valid and reliable measurement tool.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2000 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Teaching Mathematics · Teaching Efficacy · Belief

Abstract

Self-efficacy in teaching mathematics can be explained as teachers’ personal beliefs about their self-efficacy beliefs in teaching mathematics and personal perceptions of their self-ability to teach mathematics to others. Also, teachers’ attitudes, believes, and behaviors have a significant effect on students’ preparation and their academic success. So, it is important to examine teachers’ efficacy beliefs towards teaching mathematics. Not more quantitative research was found on the evaluation tools for determining teaching mathematics efficiency belief of teachers in Turkey. The purpose of the current study is to adapt the Teaching Mathematics Efficacy Belief Inventory (TMEBI) to the Turkish language. The sample of the study consists of 426 prospective mathematics teachers (54.5% female and 45.5% male). The scale that was used in the study was developed by Enochs, Smith, and Huinker (2000) to determine teaching efficacy belief towards mathematics. Firstly, for linguistic equivalence study, the correlation coefficient was examined, and then validity and reliability analysis were conducted. Validity and reliability studies were applied to adapting the Turkish form. Findings showed the high- reliability coefficients of the scale were found (Cronbach’s α (.91), McDonald’s ω (.85), and Two-Half Test (r =.83)). Finally, it can be said that the MTEBI, which was adapted to the Turkish language is a valid and reliable measurement tool.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

TAKUNYACI, M. (2021). ADAPTATION OF TEACHING MATHEMATICS EFFICACY BELIEF INVENTORY (TMEBI) INTO TURKISH. EKEV Akademi Dergisi, Sayı: 87, 413–434. https://ajindex.com/articles/401668

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (9)

  1. Acar Güvendir, M. and Özer Özkan, Y. (2015) Türkiye’deki eğitim alanında yayımlanan bilimsel dergilerde ölçek geliştirme ve uyarlama konulu makalelerin incelenmesi [The examination of scale development and scale adaptation articles published in Turkish academic journals on education]. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 14(52), 23-33.
  2. Aerni, P.W. (2008). Teacher self-efficacy and beliefs for teaching mathematics in inclusion settings. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. The College of William and Mary in Virginia. UMI Number: 3353198. Aksu, H. H. (2008). Öğretmen adaylarının matematik öğretimine yönelik öz-yeterlilik inançları [Prospective teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs regarding mathematics teaching]. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 8(2), 1610- 170. Aksu, Z. and Kul, U. (2019). The mediating role of mathematics teaching efficacy on the relationships between pedagogical content knowledge and mathematics teaching anxiety. SAGE Open 9(3), 1-10.
  3. Akyıldız, P. and Çınar, C. (2016). İlköğretim matematik öğretmen adaylarının lineer cebir dersine yönelik tutumları ve alan dili yeterliklerinin incelenmesi [Investigation of pre-service primary mathematics teachers’ attitudes towards linear algebra course and competences of the field language]. Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 14(1), 1-22.
  4. Allinder, R.M. (1994). The relationship between efficacy and the instructional practices of special education teachers and consultants. Teacher Education and Special Education, 17, 86-95.
  5. Allinder, R.M. (1995). An examination of the relationship between teacher efficacy and curriculum-based measurement and student achievement. Remedial and Special Education, 16(4), 247-254.
  6. Allison, P.D. (2002). Missing Data. California: Sage Publication, Inc. Ashton, P., Buhr, D. and Crocker, L. (1984). Teachers’sense of efficacy: A self- or norm- referenced construct? Florida Journal of Educational Research, 26(1), 29-41.
  7. Ashton, P.T., and Webb, R. B. (1986). Making a difference: Teachers’ sense of efficacy and student achievement. Longman Press.
  8. Askar, P., and Umay, A. (2001). İlköğretim matematik öğretmenliği öğrencilerinin bilgisayarla ilgili öz yeterlik algısı [Perceived Computer Self-Efficacy of the Students in The Elementary Mathematics Teaching Programme]. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 21, 1-8.
  9. Aydın, S., and Çelik, D. (2016). Preservice elementary mathematics teachers’ beliefs about preparedness to teach mathematics: scale adaptation and validati