Dergiler / Şişli Etfal Hastanesi Tıp Bülteni / 2021 / Cilt: 55 - Sayı: 4

Diabetes Risk Assessment and Awareness in a University Academics and Employees

Sayfa
[524]–531
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Therefore, to raise awareness among people, diabetes prevention training is of paramount importance, regardless of the education levels of the people, to prevent or delay the development of diabetes.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objectives: Screening of the community for diabetes is generally costly and imposes a significant financial burden.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Methods: 442 subjects were included in this study. “Diabetes awareness meetings” were organized, posters with awareness themes were displayed and brochures were distributed to academics and employees of our university.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Therefore, to raise awareness among people, diabetes prevention training is of paramount importance, regardless of the education levels of the people, to prevent or delay the development of diabetes.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Objectives: Screening of the community for diabetes is generally costly and imposes a significant financial burden. Therefore, some non-invasive measures such as the Finnish Diabetes Risk Score (FINDRISK) Scale have been developed and are generally recommended for screening of people, particularly those with a high risk of diabetes. However, the screening of the university employees including academics with FINDRISK scale has not been performed so far. Therefore, in this study, we intended to assess the risk of diabetes by FINDRISC among the academics and other employees of a university as well as to make diabetes awareness among them. Methods: 442 subjects were included in this study. “Diabetes awareness meetings” were organized, posters with awareness themes were displayed and brochures were distributed to academics and employees of our university. The FINDRISK was used for diabetes risk assessment. Participants’ height, weight, waist circumference, and body mass indexes were measured and were recorded. Results: The mean age of the participants was 36.76±9.05. About 62%, 67%, and 32% of the participants were females, married, and academic staff, respectively. The mean waist circumference and body mass index of the participants were 84.71±14.49 cm and 26.8±4.91 kg/m2, respectively, and the median FINDRISK score was 7 (3–10). The 10-year risk of developing diabetes, assessed by FINDRISK score was very high and high, moderate, mild, and low in 8, 10.6, 32.4, and 43.9% of the participants, respectively. Significant differences were found between FINDRISK scores according to gender, age, marital status, smoking status, and occupational positions of the participants (p<0.001 for all parameters). However, the FINDRISK scores of the academics were significantly higher than in other groups. Conclusion: Our study results suggest that the 10-year risk of developing diabetes is higher in academics compared to the other employees. Therefore, to raise awareness among people, diabetes prevention training is of paramount importance, regardless of the education levels of the people, to prevent or delay the development of diabetes.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

YILDIZ, T., ZUHUR, S., ZUHUR, S. S. (2021). Diabetes Risk Assessment and Awareness in a University Academics and Employees. Şişli Etfal Hastanesi Tıp Bülteni, Cilt: 55 - Sayı: 4, [524]–531. https://ajindex.com/articles/398697

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (12)

  1. Bhattacharyya OK, Estey EA, Cheng AY; Canadian Diabetes Association 2008. Update on the Canadian Diabetes Association 2008 clinical practice guidelines. Can Fam Physician 2009;55:39–43
  2. Wolfsdorf J, Craig ME, Daneman D, Dunger D, Edge J, Lee W, et al. Diabetic ketoacidosis in children and adolescents with diabetes. Pediatr Diabetes 2009;10 Suppl 12:118–33
  3. International Diabetes Federation. Diabetes Atlas (2019). 9th ed. Available at: http://www.diabetesatlas.org/. Accessed Jan 08, 2020
  4. Satman I, Omer B, Tutuncu Y, Kalaca S, Gedik S, Dinccag N, et al; TURDEP-II Study Group. Twelve-year trends in the prevalence and risk factors of diabetes and prediabetes in Turkish adults. Eur J Epidemiol 2013;28:169–80
  5. Satman I, Yilmaz T, Sengül A, Salman S, Salman F, Uygur S, et al. Population-based study of diabetes and risk characteristics in Turkey: results of the turkish diabetes epidemiology study (TURDEP). Diabetes Care 2002;25:1551–6
  6. Alper M, Öztürk M, Biricik S. Internal-2. Istanbul: Nobel Medical Bookstore; 2001. p. 731–49
  7. West B, Parikh P, Arniella G, Horowitz CR. Observations and recommendations for community-based diabetes screenings. Diabetes Educ 2010;36:887–93
  8. International Diabetes Federation Clinical Guidelines Task Force: Global Guideline for Type 2 Diabetes (2012) Available at: https:// www.idf.org/e-library/guidelines/79-global-guideline-for-type- 2-diabetes. Accessed Jan 08, 2010
  9. Rathmann W, Martin S, Haastert B, Icks A, Holle R, Löwel H, et al; KORA Study Group. Performance of screening questionnaires and risk scores for undiagnosed diabetes: the KORA Survey 2000. Arch Intern Med 2005;165:436–41
  10. Saaristo T, Peltonen M, Lindström J, Saarikoski L, Sundvall J, Eriksson JG, et al. Cross-sectional evaluation of the Finnish Diabetes Risk Score: a tool to identify undetected type 2 diabetes, abnormal glucose tolerance and metabolic syndrome. Diab Vasc Dis Res 2005;2:67–72
  11. Franciosi M, De Berardis G, Rossi MC, Sacco M, Belfiglio M, Pellegrini F, et al. Use of the diabetes risk score for opportunistic screening of undiagnosed diabetes and impaired glucose tolerance: the IGLOO (Impaired Glucose Tolerance and Long-Term Outcomes Observational) study. Diabetes Care 2005;28:1187–94
  12. International Diabetes Federation IDF Clinical Practice Recommendations for Managing Type 2 Diabetes in Primary Care. 2017. Available at:: https://www.idf.org/e-library/guidelines/128-idfclinical- practice-recommendations-for-managing-typ