Dergiler / BEYOGLU EYE JOURNAL / 2021 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2

Comparison of the Retinal and Choroidal Structures in 3 Refractive Groups

Sayfa
90–95
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Conclusion: The myopic patients had a lower CT and RNFL thickness measurement than the emmetropic and hyperopic patients, whereas the hyperopic patients had a higher CT than the other patient types.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objectives: This study investigated the retinal layer thickness, choroidal thickness (CT), and retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) parameters in 3 refractive groups.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Methods: A total of 201 eyes of 201 subjects were enrolled in this prospective and comparative study.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Conclusion: The myopic patients had a lower CT and RNFL thickness measurement than the emmetropic and hyperopic patients, whereas the hyperopic patients had a higher CT than the other patient types.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Objectives: This study investigated the retinal layer thickness, choroidal thickness (CT), and retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) parameters in 3 refractive groups. Methods: A total of 201 eyes of 201 subjects were enrolled in this prospective and comparative study. The patients were divided into 3 groups according to refractive status: Group 1 consisted of 60 eyes of myopic subjects, Group 2 comprised 72 eyes of emmetropic subjects, and 69 eyes of hyperopic subjects were categorized as Group 3. The retinal layer thickness, CT, and RNFL parameters were measured using optical coherence tomography and compared between groups. Results: The mean age of the patients was 22.33±10.11 years in Group 1, 21.55±8.3 years in Group 2, and 23.73±11.08 years in Group 3 (p=0.741). Group 1 consisted of 34 women and 26 men, Group 2 contained 44 women and 28 men, and Group 3 was made up of 45 women and 24 men (p=0.124). The mean spherical equivalent value was −6.16±2.01 D in Group 1, 0.13±0.5 D in Group 2, and 5.48±1.32 D in Group 3 (p<0.001). The RNFL and macular thickness values were lower in the myopic patients compared with those of the other groups (p<0.05). The CT measurement was lower in the myopic patients and higher in the hyperopic patients compared with the emmetropic patients (p<0.05). Conclusion: The myopic patients had a lower CT and RNFL thickness measurement than the emmetropic and hyperopic patients, whereas the hyperopic patients had a higher CT than the other patient types.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

AYDEMİR, G. A., BAYAT, A., AYDEMİR, E., ÇINAR, Ş. Ş., KARADAĞ, A. S. (2021). Comparison of the Retinal and Choroidal Structures in 3 Refractive Groups. BEYOGLU EYE JOURNAL, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2, 90–95. https://ajindex.com/articles/396510

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (15)

  1. Huang D, Swanson EA, Lin CP, Schuman JS, Stinson WG, Chang W, et al. Optical coherence tomography. Science 1991;254:1178–81
  2. Imamura Y, Fujiwara T, Margolis R, Spaide RF. Enhanced depth imaging optical coherence tomography of the choroid in central serous chorioretinopathy. Retina 2009;29:1469–73
  3. Spaide RF, Koizumi H, Pozzoni MC. Enhanced depth imaging spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Am J Ophthalmol 2008;146:496–500
  4. Nickla DL, Wallman J. The multifunctional choroid. Prog Retin Eye Res 2010;29:144–68
  5. Kim SW, Oh J, Kwon SS, Yoo J, Huh K. Comparison of choroidal thickness among patients with healthy eyes, early age-related maculopathy, neovascular age-related macular degeneration, central serous chorioretinopathy, and polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy. Retina 2011;31:1904–11
  6. Hung LF, Wallman J, Smith EL III. Vision-dependent changes in the choroidal thickness of macaque monkeys. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2000;41:1259–69
  7. Wallman J, Wildsoet C, Xu A. Moving the retina: choroidal modulation of refractive state. Vision Res 2006;46:267–83
  8. Mrejen S, Spaide RF. Optical coherence tomography: Imaging of the choroid and beyond. Surv Ophthalmol 2013;58:387-429
  9. Jonas JB, Budde WM, Panda-Jonas S. Ophthalmoscopic evaluation of the optic nerve head. Surv Ophthalmol 1999;43,293– 320
  10. Hoffmann EM, Schmidtmann I, Siouli A, Schuster AK, Beutel ME, Pfeiffer N, et al. The distribution of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness and associations with age, refraction, and axial length: the Gutenberg health study. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2018;256,1685–93
  11. Wei WB, Xu L, Jonas JB, Shao L, Du KF, Wang S, et al. Subfoveal choroidal thickness: the Beijing eye study. Ophthalmology 2012;120,175–80
  12. Ren R, Li B, Gao F, Li L, Xu X, Wang N, et al. Central corneal thickness, lamina cribrosa and peripapillary scleral histomorphometry in non-glaucomatous Chinese eyes. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2010;248,1579–85
  13. Kaderli A, Acar MA, Ünlü N, Üney GÖ, Örnek F. The correlation of hyperopia and choroidal thickness, vessel diameter and area. Int Ophthalmol 2018;38:645–53
  14. Duan F, Yuan Z, Deng J, Wong YL, Yeo AC, Chen X. Choroidal thickness and associated factors among adult myopia: a baseline report from a medical university student cohort. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 2019;26:244–50
  15. Heirani M, Shandiz JH, Shojaei A, Narooie-Noori F. Choroidal thickness profile in normal iranian eyes with different refractive status by spectral