Dergiler / Turkish Thoracic Journal / 2021 / Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 4

The Perspective of the Turkish Thoracic Society Members on Institutional Preparedness During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Turkey

Sayfa
317–323
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Considering the health and safety of HCWs, the control measures should be actively monitored and deficiencies eliminated

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the perspective of the Turkish Thoracic Society (TTS) members regarding institutional preparedness, in terms of administrative measures and availability of personal protective equipment (PPE), in the first and third months of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in Turkey.MATERIAL AND METHODS: A 22-item online survey was e-mailed between the first and third months to TTS members, and participants’ responses were evaluated.RESULTS: The number of participants was 295 in the first survey and 141 in the second.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:In the second survey, the percentage of answers implying availability increased in all 18 control measures, 16 of which were statistically significant.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Considering the health and safety of HCWs, the control measures should be actively monitored and deficiencies eliminated
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:2019 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the perspective of the Turkish Thoracic Society (TTS) members regarding institutional preparedness, in terms of administrative measures and availability of personal protective equipment (PPE), in the first and third months of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in Turkey.MATERIAL AND METHODS: A 22-item online survey was e-mailed between the first and third months to TTS members, and participants’ responses were evaluated.RESULTS: The number of participants was 295 in the first survey and 141 in the second. In the second survey, the percentage of answers implying availability increased in all 18 control measures, 16 of which were statistically significant. However, there were still less than half of the respondents who reported the availability of psychological and behavioral support and some PPE, including respirators, facial protectors, goggles, and gowns. Statistical significance was observed for provision of a waiting area (P = .008), rooms for aerosol-generating procedures (P = .042), and special wards for patients with suspected or definite COVID-19 (P < .001); testing healthcare workers (HCWs) with a history of contact with a COVID-19 case (P < .001); and surveillance of symptomatic HCWs (P = .048), between tertiary vs. primary and secondary healthcare facilities in the first survey, but provision of special wards (P = .002) and supply for aprons (P = .027) in the second survey.CONCLUSION: Our results showed an improvement in control measures in the third month of the pandemic. However, the persistent low availability of psychological and behavioral support and several items of PPE pointed out the need for action. Considering the health and safety of HCWs, the control measures should be actively monitored and deficiencies eliminated

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

SANDAL, A., TÖREYİN, Z. N., SALTÜRK, C., ARBAK, P. M. (2021). The Perspective of the Turkish Thoracic Society Members on Institutional Preparedness During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Turkey. Turkish Thoracic Journal, Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 4, 317–323. https://ajindex.com/articles/395160

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (8)

  1. Timeline of WHO’s response to COVID-19 2020. 2020. Available at: https://www.who.int/news-room/detail/29-06-2020-co vidtimeline/
  2. Gandhi RT, Lynch JB, del Rio C. Mild or moderate Covid-19. N Engl J Med. 2020;383:1757-1766. [CrossRef] 3. Koh D. Occupational risks for COVID-19 infection. Occup Med. 2020;70:3-5. [CrossRef] 4. Nguyen LH, Drew DA, Graham MS et al. Risk of COVID-19 among front-line health-care workers and the general community: a prospective cohort study. Lancet Public Health. 2020;5:e475-e483. [CrossRef] 5. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Infection prevention and control for COVID-19 in healthcare settings – Third update. 2020. Available at: https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/ sites/default/files/documents/Infection-prevention-control -for-the-care-of-patients-with-2019-nCoV-healthcare-settings_ third-update.pdf
  3. Republic of Turkey Ministry of Family, Labour, and Social Services. [Fight with COVID-19 at workplaces]. 2020. Available at:
  4. Republic of Turkey Ministry of Health. [Advices on personal protective equipment use against COVID-19 according to type of healthcare facility, duty and work activity]. 2020. Available at: https://covid19bilgi.saglik.gov.tr/depo/enfeksiyon-kontorl-o nlemleri/KISISEL_KORUYUCU_EKIPMAN_KULLANIMI.pdf
  5. Republic of Turkey Ministry of Health. [Guideline on COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2 infection)]. 2020. Available at:
  6. U.S. Department of Labor Occupational Safety and Health Administration. Guidance on preparing workplaces for COVID-19. 2020. Available at:
  7. Burki T. Global shortage of personal protective equipment. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020;20:785-786. [CrossRef] 11. Anatolian Agency. [The Minister of Health declared the first diagnosed case of COVID-19]. 2020. Available at: https://ww w.aa.com.tr/tr/koronavirus/saglik-bakani-koca-turkiyede-ilkkoronavirus-vakasinin-goruldugunu-acikladi/1761466
  8. Albano D, Bruno A, Bruno F et al. Impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) emergency on Italian radiologists: a national survey. Eur Radiol. 2020;30:6635-6644. [CrossRef] 13. Paffenholz P, Peine A, Hellmich M et al. Perception of the 2020 SARS-CoV-2 pandemic among medical professionals in Germany: results from a nationwide online survey. Emerg Microbes Infect. 2020;9:1590-1599. [CrossRef] 14. Smith PM, Oudyk J, Potter G, Mustard C. The