Dergiler / Türk Geriatri Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 4

THE ROLE OF FRAILTY IN PHYSICIANS’ DECISIONS FOR SEVERE DISABILITY

Sayfa
492–500
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Since only patients who applied for medical board evaluation to theneurology clinic were included in our study, our results are relevant for neurologycases and cannot be generalized for all patients who applied for evaluation.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Introduction: We aimed to evaluate the correlation between disability approvedby the medical board and frailty determined by the Edmonton Frail Scale, which isa tool used to assess frailty.Materials and Method: We enrolled patients admitted to the neurologyoutpatient clinic of the Bursa Yuksek Ihtisas Training and Research Hospital between1st-31st March 2019 for examination in order to obtain a disability report from themedical board.Results: Cerebrovascular disease and dementia were more prevalent in olderage, while epilepsy, cerebral palsy sequela and other neurological diseases wereobserved at a younger age.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:A strong correlation was observed between frailtyanalysis score and Balthazard disability percentage (p 8 correlate significantly with anincreased risk of severe disability.Conclusion: We conclude that use of the frailty analysis score in combinationwith Balthazard disability percentage for patients applying to the medical boardcould be practical and rational in evaluating the degree of disability and predictingsevere disability.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Since only patients who applied for medical board evaluation to theneurology clinic were included in our study, our results are relevant for neurologycases and cannot be generalized for all patients who applied for evaluation.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2019 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Introduction: We aimed to evaluate the correlation between disability approvedby the medical board and frailty determined by the Edmonton Frail Scale, which isa tool used to assess frailty.Materials and Method: We enrolled patients admitted to the neurologyoutpatient clinic of the Bursa Yuksek Ihtisas Training and Research Hospital between1st-31st March 2019 for examination in order to obtain a disability report from themedical board.Results: Cerebrovascular disease and dementia were more prevalent in olderage, while epilepsy, cerebral palsy sequela and other neurological diseases wereobserved at a younger age. A strong correlation was observed between frailtyanalysis score and Balthazard disability percentage (p 8 correlate significantly with anincreased risk of severe disability.Conclusion: We conclude that use of the frailty analysis score in combinationwith Balthazard disability percentage for patients applying to the medical boardcould be practical and rational in evaluating the degree of disability and predictingsevere disability. Since only patients who applied for medical board evaluation to theneurology clinic were included in our study, our results are relevant for neurologycases and cannot be generalized for all patients who applied for evaluation.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

HAKİ, C., DEMİRCİ, H. (2020). THE ROLE OF FRAILTY IN PHYSICIANS’ DECISIONS FOR SEVERE DISABILITY. Türk Geriatri Dergisi, Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 4, 492–500. https://ajindex.com/articles/394756

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. Regulation on Disability Assessment for Adults No. 30692 dated February 20, 2019. T. C. Official Gazette, Number: 30692. [Internet] Available from: https://www.resmigazete.gov. tr/eskiler/2019/02/20190220-2.htm. Accessed: 20.02.2019(in Turkish
  2. Organization WH, World report on disability 2011, World Health Organization 2011. [Internet] Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/44575. Accessed: 20.02.2019 3. Devlet İstatistik Enstitüsü (DİE). Türkiye Özürlüler Araştırması 2002. Ankara: 2004 4. Clegg A, Young J, Iliffe S, Rikkert MO, Rockwood K. Frailty in elderly people. The lancet 2013;381(9868):752-62. (PMID: 23395245
  3. Fried LP, Tangen CM, Walston J, et al. Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences 2001;56(3):M146-M57. (PMID: 11253156)
  4. Eeles EM, White SV, O’Mahony SM, Bayer AJ, Hubbard RE. The impact of frailty and delirium on mortality in older inpatients. Age Ageing 2012;41(3):412-6. (PMID: 22391613
  5. Collard RM, Boter H, Schoevers RA, Oude Voshaar RC. Prevalence of frailty in community-dwelling older persons: a systematic review. J Am Geriatr Soc 2012;60(8):1487-92. (PMID: 22881367)
  6. Nguyen T, Cumming R, Hilmer S. A review of frailty in developing countries. J Nutr Health Aging 2015;19(9):941-6. (PMID: 26482697
  7. Eyigor S, Kutsal Y, Duran E, et al. Frailty prevalence and related factors in the older adult-FrailTURK Project. Age 2015;37(3):50. (PMID: 25948502
  8. Rolfson DB, Majumdar SR, Tsuyuki RT, Tahir A, Rockwood K. Validity and reliability of the Edmonton Frail Scale. Age Ageing 2006;35(5):526-9. (PMID: 16757522
  9. Aygör HE, Fadıloğlu Ç, Şahin S, Aykar FŞ, Akçiçek F. Validation of Edmonton Frail Scale into elderly Turkish population. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics. 2018;76:133–7
  10. Cabalar M, Tatlidede AD, Yazar T, Guveli B, Yayla V. Evaluation of the neurological disability rates in medical commission. Medical Journal of Bakırkoy 2011;7(4):142-6.(in Turkish)(DOI: 10.5350/ BTDMJB201107404
  11. Benli AR, Cortuk M, Inci H, Benli NC. Evaluation of Causes Application on Medical Board. Konuralp Medical Journal 2016;8(3):167-72.(in Turkish) (DOI:10.18521/KTD.280035
  12. Evlice A, Demir T, Aslan K, et al. Disability at Neurological Diseases. Cukurova Medical Journal 2014;39(3):566-71.(in Turkish)( DOI:10.17826 / CUTF.78721
  13. Choi Y-S, Kim M-J, Lee G-Y, et al. The association between frailty and disability among the elder