Dergiler / Eskişehir Technical University Journal of Science and Technology A - Applied Sciences and Engineering / 2022 / Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 1

A HYBRID TEXTURAL AND GEOMETRICAL FEATURE EXTRACTION TO REVEAL HIDDEN INFORMATION FROM SUSPICIOUS REGIONS ON MAMMOGRAMS

Sayfa
70–86
Yayın Tarihi
2022-03-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The proposed feature combination is determined to be more effective for more accurate diagnoses of benignity and malignancy.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:A mammographic feature extraction scheme through textural and geometrical descriptors is examined to implement in a computer-aided diagnosis system for breast cancer diagnosis in this paper.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:All the three feature vectors are separately utilized to diagnose the ROIs via Random Forest classifier using 5-fold cross-validation.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The proposed feature combination is determined to be more effective for more accurate diagnoses of benignity and malignancy.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Digital Mammography · Computer-Aided Diagnosis · Feature Extraction

Abstract

A mammographic feature extraction scheme through textural and geometrical descriptors is examined to implement in a computer-aided diagnosis system for breast cancer diagnosis in this paper. This scheme is verified on a selected subset of suspicious regions (Region of Interest – ROIs) detected on a publicly available mammogram image database constructed by the Mammographic Image Analysis Society. The ROI detection is succeeded using the Chan-Vese active contour modelling after some pre-processing operations which are median filtering, morphological operations, and a region growing method performed for digitization noise reduction, artifact suppression and background removal, and pectoral muscle removal, respectively, applied on mammogram images. Then, a new adaptive convex hull approach is introduced for extracting geometrical descriptors of the ROIs accompanied by the Haralick features extracted from the gray-level co-occurrence matrices for textural description. In addition to geometrical and textural features, a hybrid mammographic feature vector is constructed by concatenating these features. All the three feature vectors are separately utilized to diagnose the ROIs via Random Forest classifier using 5-fold cross-validation. The experimental studies show that the textural features diagnose benignity more specifically and malignancy more accurately; and they are more effective on discriminating healthy ROIs when concatenated with geometrical features. Hence, a feature combination of these three features is proposed for diagnosis. The proposed feature combination is determined to be more effective for more accurate diagnoses of benignity and malignancy.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ESENER, İ. I., KARA, Ş., ERGİN, S., ÇALIŞIR, C. (2022). A HYBRID TEXTURAL AND GEOMETRICAL FEATURE EXTRACTION TO REVEAL HIDDEN INFORMATION FROM SUSPICIOUS REGIONS ON MAMMOGRAMS. Eskişehir Technical University Journal of Science and Technology A - Applied Sciences and Engineering, Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 1, 70–86. https://ajindex.com/articles/390770

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (15)

  1. World Health Organization, available at https://www.who.int/cancer/prevention/diagnosis-screening/breast-cancer/en/ (accessed January 2020)
  2. Wang, L. Early diagnosis of breast cancer. Sensors 2017; 17 (7): 1572-1591
  3. Meenalochini G, Ramkumar S. Survey of machine learning algorithms for breast cancer detection using mammogram images. Materials Today: Proceedings, 2021; 37 (2): 2738-2743
  4. Ergin S, Kılınç O. A new feature extraction framework based on wavelets for breast cancer diagnosis. Comput Biol Med, 2014; 51: 171-182
  5. Heywang-Köbrunner SH, Hacker A, Sedlacek S. Advantages and disadvantages of mammography screening. Breast Care, 2011; 6 (3):199-207
  6. Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin, 2011; 61 (2): 69-90
  7. Üncü YA, Özdoğan H. Mamografi sistemlerinde ilgi alanı, türev ve ince gruplama seçimlerinin modülasyon transfer fonksiyonunun üzerine etkileri. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Fen Edebiyat Fakültesi Fen Dergisi, 2020; 15 (1): 23-35
  8. Üncü YA, Sevim G, Mercan T, Vural V, Durmaz E, Canpolat M. Differentiation of tumoral and non-tumoral breast lesions using back reflection diffuse optical tomography: A pilot clinical study. Int J Imaging Syst Technol, 2021; 1-9
  9. Radovic M, Djokovic M, Peulic A, Filipovic N. Application of data mining algorithms for mammogram classification. In: 2013 IEEE 13th International Conference on Bioinformatics and Bioengineering (BIBE); 10-13November 2013; Chania, Greece, 1–4
  10. Ganesan K, Acharya UR, Chua CK, Min LC, Matthew B, Thomas AK. Decision support system for breast cancer detection using mammograms. Proc Inst Mech Eng H, 2013; 227 (7): 721–732
  11. Li JB, Wang YH, Chu SC, Roddick JF. Kernel self-optimization learning for kernel-based feature extraction and recognition. Inf Sci, 2014; 257: 70-80
  12. Ramos RP, Nascimento MZ, Pereira DC. Texture extraction: an evaluation of ridgelet, wavelet and co-occurrence based techniques applied to mammograms. Expert Syst Appl, 2012; 39 (12): 11036-11047
  13. Shradhananda B, Banshidhar M, Ratnakar D. Mammogram classification using two dimensional discrete wavelet transform and gray-level co-occurrence matrix for detection of breast cancer. Neurocomputing, 2015; 154: 1–14
  14. Vallez N et al. Breast density classification to reduce false positives in CADe systems. Comput Biol Med, 2013;113 (2): 569–584
  15. Imran S, Lodhi BA, Alzahrani A. Unsupervised method to localize masses in mamm