Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Earth Sciences / 2012 / Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 6

Testing Alternative Tectono-Stratigraphic Interpretations of the Late Palaeozoic−Early Mesozoic Karakaya Complex in NW Turkey: Support for an Accretionary Origin Related to Northward Subduction of Palaeotethys

Sayfa
961–1007
Yayın Tarihi
2012-06-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Collision culminated in imbrication of the Karakaya accretionary complex with the Late Palaeozoic Sakarya 'basement' and its sedimentary cover.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Lower Carboniferous-Upper Triassic rocks of the Karakaya Complex exposed E-W across Turkey are critical to reconstructions of Palaeotethys in the Eastern Mediterranean region.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Despite decades of research, the origin and emplacement of the Karakaya Complex remains controversial because it is mapped either as an overall stratigraphic succession of sedimentary olistostromes or as a stack of thrust sheets and mélange.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Collision culminated in imbrication of the Karakaya accretionary complex with the Late Palaeozoic Sakarya 'basement' and its sedimentary cover.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Karakaya Complex · NW Turkey · Sakarya Continent

Özet

Lower Carboniferous-Upper Triassic rocks of the Karakaya Complex exposed E-W across Turkey are critical to reconstructions of Palaeotethys in the Eastern Mediterranean region. Despite decades of research, the origin and emplacement of the Karakaya Complex remains controversial because it is mapped either as an overall stratigraphic succession of sedimentary olistostromes or as a stack of thrust sheets and mélange. Tectonic models include a continental rift, a back-arc rift, a marginal oceanic basin, and an accretionary prism formed by subduction of a wide ocean. Subduction is seen as either northwards or southwards. To test the alternatives, the various litho-tectonic units and their contact relations were studied in nine outcrops across northwestern Turkey. Our field evidence indicates that the Karakaya Complex was assembled by regional-scale thrust faulting without evidence of stratigraphical contacts or even of deformed sedimentary contacts between the main units. The structurally lower levels of the Karakaya Complex of Triassic age (~lower Karakaya assemblage) are dominated by an imbricated, mainly volcaniclastic sequence (~Nilüfer Unit) that was metamorphosed under high pressure-low temperature conditions and rapidly exhumed. Structurally higher, lower-grade rocks (~upper Karakaya assemblage) are characterised by several coherent lithotectonic units, including the Upper Permian-Lower Triassic Çal Unit, dominated by alkaline volcanics and shelf to redeposited carbonates, a contrasting mainly Upper Permian unit including terrigenous sediments, and the Triassic Ortaoba Unit, dominated by mid-ocean ridge-type basalts, radiolarian sediments and sandstone turbidites. Two associated composite units (Hodul and Orhanlar units) are interpreted as accretionary mélanges (rather than olistostromes) that were tectonically assembled and emplaced during Late Triassic time. Pre-Karakaya-age meta-siliciclastic sedimentary rocks (~Kalabak unit) are intruded by Devonian and Lower Carboniferous granites in several areas. Arkosic cover sediments (Halılar Formation) above the Kalabak unit accumulated during Late Triassic (Norian) time prior to final emplacement of the Karakya Complex. The 'basement units' are interpreted as thrust slices that were emplaced to a high structural level during final emplacement of the Karakaya Complex in latest Triassic time. Transgression by shelf sediments followed from the Early Jurassic onwards following regional uplift and erosion. In our proposed tectonic model, Palaeotethyan oceanic crust (~Triassic Ortaoba Unit) subducted northwards beneath the Sakarya Continent. Seamounts capped with carbonate build-ups formed near the southern margin of Palaeotethys (~Çal Unit). The Upper Permian neritic carbonates associated with terrigenous clastics (unnamed unit) probably rifted from the Tauride continent to the south. Large oceanic seamounts erupted within the Triassic ocean (~Nilüfer Unit). The seamounts and continental fragments drifted northwards until they collided with the southern, active margin of the Sakarya Continent. The accretionary prism was emplaced northwards over deltaic to deeper-marine cover sediments of the Sakarya Continent during Norian time. Collision culminated in imbrication of the Karakaya accretionary complex with the Late Palaeozoic Sakarya 'basement' and its sedimentary cover.

Abstract

Lower Carboniferous-Upper Triassic rocks of the Karakaya Complex exposed E-W across Turkey are critical to reconstructions of Palaeotethys in the Eastern Mediterranean region. Despite decades of research, the origin and emplacement of the Karakaya Complex remains controversial because it is mapped either as an overall stratigraphic succession of sedimentary olistostromes or as a stack of thrust sheets and mélange. Tectonic models include a continental rift, a back-arc rift, a marginal oceanic basin, and an accretionary prism formed by subduction of a wide ocean. Subduction is seen as either northwards or southwards. To test the alternatives, the various litho-tectonic units and their contact relations were studied in nine outcrops across northwestern Turkey. Our field evidence indicates that the Karakaya Complex was assembled by regional-scale thrust faulting without evidence of stratigraphical contacts or even of deformed sedimentary contacts between the main units. The structurally lower levels of the Karakaya Complex of Triassic age (~lower Karakaya assemblage) are dominated by an imbricated, mainly volcaniclastic sequence (~Nilüfer Unit) that was metamorphosed under high pressure-low temperature conditions and rapidly exhumed. Structurally higher, lower-grade rocks (~upper Karakaya assemblage) are characterised by several coherent lithotectonic units, including the Upper Permian-Lower Triassic Çal Unit, dominated by alkaline volcanics and shelf to redeposited carbonates, a contrasting mainly Upper Permian unit including terrigenous sediments, and the Triassic Ortaoba Unit, dominated by mid-ocean ridge-type basalts, radiolarian sediments and sandstone turbidites. Two associated composite units (Hodul and Orhanlar units) are interpreted as accretionary mélanges (rather than olistostromes) that were tectonically assembled and emplaced during Late Triassic time. Pre-Karakaya-age meta-siliciclastic sedimentary rocks (~Kalabak unit) are intruded by Devonian and Lower Carboniferous granites in several areas. Arkosic cover sediments (Halılar Formation) above the Kalabak unit accumulated during Late Triassic (Norian) time prior to final emplacement of the Karakya Complex. The 'basement units' are interpreted as thrust slices that were emplaced to a high structural level during final emplacement of the Karakaya Complex in latest Triassic time. Transgression by shelf sediments followed from the Early Jurassic onwards following regional uplift and erosion. In our proposed tectonic model, Palaeotethyan oceanic crust (~Triassic Ortaoba Unit) subducted northwards beneath the Sakarya Continent. Seamounts capped with carbonate build-ups formed near the southern margin of Palaeotethys (~Çal Unit). The Upper Permian neritic carbonates associated with terrigenous clastics (unnamed unit) probably rifted from the Tauride continent to the south. Large oceanic seamounts erupted within the Triassic ocean (~Nilüfer Unit). The seamounts and continental fragments drifted northwards until they collided with the southern, active margin of the Sakarya Continent. The accretionary prism was emplaced northwards over deltaic to deeper-marine cover sediments of the Sakarya Continent during Norian time. Collision culminated in imbrication of the Karakaya accretionary complex with the Late Palaeozoic Sakarya 'basement' and its sedimentary cover.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

USTAÖMER, A. H. F. R. &. T., USTAÖMER, T. (2012). Testing Alternative Tectono-Stratigraphic Interpretations of the Late Palaeozoic−Early Mesozoic Karakaya Complex in NW Turkey: Support for an Accretionary Origin Related to Northward Subduction of Palaeotethys. Turkish Journal of Earth Sciences, Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 6, 961–1007. https://ajindex.com/articles/384676

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (6)

  1. Akyürek, B. & Soysal, Y. 1983. Biga yarımadası güneyinin (Savaştepe-Kırkağaç-Bergama-Ayvalık) temel jeoloji özellikleri [Basic geological characteristics of the southern Biga Peninsula (Savaştepe-Kırkağaç-Bergama-Ayvalık area)]. Maden Tetkik ve Arama Enstitüsü (MTA) Dergisi 95/96, 1–13 [in Turkish with English abstract]. Alkaya, F. 1981. Bilecik yöresi Lias ammonit zonları (Liassic ammonite zones in the Bilecik region). İstanbul, Yerbilimleri 1, 297–302 [in Turkish with English abstract]. Altiner, D. & Koçyİğİt, A. 1993. Th ird remark on the Geology of the Karakaya Basin. Anisian megablock in Northern Central Anatolia: micropaleontologic, stratigraphic and tectonic implications for the rift ing stage of the Karakaya Basin, Turkey. Revue de Paléogiologie (Geneva) 12, 1–17.
  2. Altiner, D., Koçyİğİt, A., Farinacci, A., Nicosia, U. & Conti, M.A. 1991. Jurassic–Lower Cretaceous stratigraphy and palaeogeographic evolution of the southern part of north- western Anatolia (Turkey). Geologica Romana 27, 13–80.
  3. Altiner, D., Özkan-Altiner, S. & Koçyİğİt, A. 2000. Late Permian foraminiferal biofacies belts in Turkey: palaeogeographic and tectonic implications. In: Bozkurt, E., Winchester, J.A. & Piper, J.A.D. (eds), Tectonics and Magmatism in Turkey and Surrounding Area. Geological Society, London, Special Publications 173, 83–96.
  4. Altinli, I.E. 1973. Bilecik Jurassic (Turkey). In: Doyran, S. (ed), Papers, Congress of Earth Sciences on the occasion of the 50th anniversary of the Turkish Republic.17–19 December 1973,
  5. MTA Publication, Ankara, 105–114.
  6. Aslaner, M. 1965. Etude géologique et pétrographique de la région d’Edremit-Havran (Turquie). MTA Publication 119. Aygen, T. 1956. Etude géologique de la région de Balya. Special Publication of the Maden Tetkik ve Arama Enstitüsü (MTA), D11. Aysal, N., Ustaömer, T., Öngen, S., Keskİn, M., Köksal, S., Peytcheva, I. & Fenning, M. 2012. Origin of the Lower– Middle Devonian magmatism in the Sakarya Zone, NW Turkey: geochronology, geochemistry and isotope systematics. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 45, 201–222. Bİ8ngöl, E., Akyürek, B. & Korkmazer, B. 1973. Biga Yarımadasının jeolojisi ve Karakaya Formasyonunun bazı özellikleri [Geology of the Biga Peninsula and some characteristics of the Karakaya Formation]. Cumhuriyetin 50. Yılı Yerbilimleri Kongresi, Tebliğer, MTA Enstitüsü [Congress on Earth Sciences for the 50th Anniversary of Republic of Turkey, Abstracts], p. 70–77 [in Turkish with English abstract]. Bİngöl, E., Akyürek, B