Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Urology / 2016 / Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 2

RE: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy for isolated calyceal stones: How important is the stone location? ( Author’s Reply )

Sayfa
115–116
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ÖZGÖR, F., KÜÇÜKTOPÇU, O., ŞİMŞEK, A., SARILAR, Ö., BİNBAY, M., GÜRBÜZ, G. (2016). RE: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy for isolated calyceal stones: How important is the stone location? ( Author’s Reply ). Turkish Journal of Urology, Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 2, 115–116. https://ajindex.com/articles/379912

Kaynakça (1)

  1. McAllister M, Lim K, Torrey R, Chenoweth J, Barker B, Baldwin DD. Intercostal vessels and nerves are at risk for injury during supracostal percutaneous nephrostolithotomy. J Urol 2011;185:329-34. [CrossRef] 2. Munver R, Delvecchio FC, Newman GE, Preminger GM. Critical analysis of supracostal access for percutaneous renal surgery. J Urol 2001;166:1242-6. [CrossRef] 3. Shaban A, Kodera A, El Ghoneimy MN, Orban TZ, Mursi K, Hegazy A. Safety and efficacy of supracostal access in percutaneous renal surgery. J Endourol 2008;22:29-34. [CrossRef] 4. Lojanapiwat B, Prasopsuk S. Upper-pole access for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: comparison of supracostal and infracostal approaches. J Endourol 2006;20:491-4. [CrossRef] 5. Jun-Ou J, Lojanapiwat B. Supracostal access: does it affect tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy efficacy and safety? Int Braz J Urol 2010;36:171-6.