Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar
AI InsightThe differences in pregnancy rates and live-birth rates were especially evident in IVFcases where male factor was the reason for the treatment.
📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale
Özet
Objective: The aim of the present study was to analyze the success rates of frozen and fresh embryotransfer methods in different patient groups.Material and methods: The study included 453 patients who underwent in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment. The patients were further divided into three groups as male factor, tubal/ovarian/uterine factor, andother factors. IVF treatment was performed through either fresh or frozen embryo transfer (FET). Of the453 patients, 298 had fresh embryo transfer, and 155 received FET. The implantation and live-birth ratesof FET were compared with fresh transfer approach, focusing on the effects of male infertility.Results: There was a significant difference between the pregnancy ratios of patients who underwent freshembryo transfer versus patients who underwent FET. In patients who were receiving IVF treatment due tomale factors, the pregnancy rate was 49.32% in the fresh embryo transfer group, whereas it was 69.70% inthe FET group, revealing a significant difference between the two groups (p=0.0321). Although the livebirth ratios were higher in the FET group both among all patients who underwent IVF due to male factor,the differences between the groups were not statistically significant.Conclusion: We observed higher pregnancy rates in FET patients compared with fresh embryo transferin the study group. The differences in pregnancy rates and live-birth rates were especially evident in IVFcases where male factor was the reason for the treatment.