Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Urology / 2017 / Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 4

Does antegrade JJ stenting affect the total operative time during laparoscopic pyeloplasty

Laparoskopik pyeloplasti sırasında antegrat JJ stent yerleştirme, operasyon süresini etkiler mi?

Sayfa
497–501
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The mean hospital stays and the mean anastomosis times weresimilar between the two groups (p>0.05).Conclusion: Antegrade JJ stenting during laparoscopic pyeloplasty significantly decreased the total operativetime.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: We aimed to show the effect of retrograde JJ stenting and intraoperative antegrade JJ stentingtechniques on operative time in patients who underwent laparoscopic pyeloplasty.Material and methods: A total of 34 patients were retrospectively investigated (15 male and 19 female)with ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Of the patients stentized under local anesthesia preoperatively, asa part of surgery, 15 were retrogradely stentized at the beginning of the procedure (Group 1), and 19 wereantegradely stentized during the procedure (Group 2).
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The mean hospital stays and the mean anastomosis times weresimilar between the two groups (p>0.05).Conclusion: Antegrade JJ stenting during laparoscopic pyeloplasty significantly decreased the total operativetime.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Objective: We aimed to show the effect of retrograde JJ stenting and intraoperative antegrade JJ stentingtechniques on operative time in patients who underwent laparoscopic pyeloplasty.Material and methods: A total of 34 patients were retrospectively investigated (15 male and 19 female)with ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Of the patients stentized under local anesthesia preoperatively, asa part of surgery, 15 were retrogradely stentized at the beginning of the procedure (Group 1), and 19 wereantegradely stentized during the procedure (Group 2). A transperitoneal dismembered pyeloplasty techniquewas performed in all patients. The two groups were retrospectively compared in terms of complications, themean total operative time, and the mean stenting times.Results: The mean ages of the patients were 31.5±15.5 and 33.2±15.5 years (p=0.09), and the mean bodymass indexes were 25.8±5.6 and 26.2.3±8.4 kg/m2 in Group 1 and Group 2, respectively. The mean totaloperative times were 128.9±38.9 min and 112.7±21.9 min (p=0.04); the mean stenting times were 12.6±5.4min and 3.5±2.4 min (p=0.02); and the mean rates of catheterization-to-total surgery times were 0.1 and0.03 (p=0.01) in Group 1 and 2, respectively. The mean hospital stays and the mean anastomosis times weresimilar between the two groups (p>0.05).Conclusion: Antegrade JJ stenting during laparoscopic pyeloplasty significantly decreased the total operativetime.

Abstract

Amaç: Laparoskopik pyeloplasti uygulanan hastalarda retrograt ve intraoperatif antegrad JJ stent uygulama tekniğinin ameliyat süresi üzerine etkisini göstermeyi amaçladık. Gereç ve yöntemler: Ureteropelvik darlık nedeniyle transperitoneal laparoskopik pyeloplasti yapılan toplam 34 hastanın bulguları retrospektif olarak incelendi. Hastaların 15'ine laparoskopik cerrahiye başlamadan hemen önce retrograt olarak stent uygulaması yapıldı (Grup 1) ve 19 hastaya işlem sırasında antegrat stent yerleştirildi (Grup 2). İki grubun komplikasyonları, total ameliyat süreleri ve stent yerleştirme süreleri geriye dönük olarak karşılaştırıldı. Bulgular: Grup 1 ve Grup 2'de hastaların yaş ortalaması 31,5±15,5 ve 33,2±15,5 yıl (p=0,09); ortalama vücut kitle indeksleri 25,8±5,6 ve 26,2±8,4 kg/m2 idi. Total cerrahi süreleri 128,9±38,9 ve 112,7±21,9 dakika; ortalama JJ stent yerleştirme süresi 12,6±5,4 ve 3,5±2,4 dakika bulundu (p=0,02). Ortalama JJ kateterizasyonun total cerrahi süreye oranı Grup 1’de 0,1; Grup 2’de ise 0,03 (p=0,01) bulundu. Hastane ortalama kalış süresi ve ortalama anastomoz süreleri iki grup arasında benzerdi (p>0,05). Sonuç: Laparoskopik pyeloplasti sırasında yapılan antegrad JJ stent uygulaması, retrograt tekniğe göre cerrahi süreyi belirgin olarak kısaltmaktadır

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

BOLAT, M. S., ÇINAR, Ö., AKDENİZ, E. (2017). Does antegrade JJ stenting affect the total operative time during laparoscopic pyeloplasty. Turkish Journal of Urology, Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 4, 497–501. https://ajindex.com/articles/379729

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (6)

  1. Cakan M, Yalcinkaya F, Demirel F, Satir A. Is visualising ureter before pyeloplasty necessary in adult patients? Int Urol Nephrol 2000;32:33-5.
  2. Rushton HG, Salem Y, Belman AB, Majd M. Pediatric pyeloplasty: is routine retrograde pyelography necessary? J Urol 1994;152:604-6.
  3. Mandhani A, Goel S, Bhandari M. Re: Is antegrade stentıng superior to retrograde stenting in laparoscopic pyeloplasty? J Urol 2004;172:2484-5.
  4. Daley BJ, Cecil W, Clarke PC, Cofer JB, Guillamondegui OD. How slow is too slow? Correlation of operative time to complications: an analysis from the Tennessee Surgical Quality Collaborative. J Am Coll Surg 2015;220:550-8. [CrossRef] Tan HL. Laparoscopic Anderson Hynes dismembered pyeloplasty in children using needlescopic instrumentation. Urol Clin North Am 2001;28:43. [CrossRef] Stravodimos K, Katafigiotis I, Fragkiadis E, Tyritzis S, Constantinides CA. Correcting and sharing our complications. Misplacement of pigtail catheter, during a Robot Assisted Pyeloplasty. Clinical findings, diagnosis, possible causes and endoscopic treatment. Arch Ital Urol Androl 2015;87:165-6.
  5. Pansota MS, Rasool M, Saleem MS, Tabassum SA, Hussain A. Indications and complications of double J ureteral stenting: Our experience. Gomal J Med Sci 2013;11:8-12.
  6. Kalkan S, Ersöz C, Armagan A, Taşç ı AI, Silay MS. A Modified Antegrade Stenting Technique for Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty in Infants and Children. Urol Int 2016;96:183-7. [CrossRef] Jarrett TW, Chan, DY, Charambura TC, Fugita O, Kavoussi LR. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: the first 100 cases. J Urol 2002;167:1253-6. [CrossRef] Eden CG, Cahill D, Allen D. Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty: 50 consecutive cases. BJU Int 2001;88:526-31. [CrossRef] Soulie ́M, Salomon L, Patard JJ, Mouly P, Manunta A, Antiphon P, et al. Extraperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty: a multicenter study of 55 procedures. J Urol 2001;166:48-50. [CrossRef] Arumainayagam N, Minervini A, Davenport K, Davenport K, Kumar V, Masieri L, et al. Antegrade versus retrograde stenting in laparoscopic pye- loplasty. J Endourol 2008;22:671-4. [CrossRef] Viprakasit DP, Altamar HO, Miller NL, Herrell SD. Intraoperative retrograde ureteral stent placement and manuplation during laparoscopic pyeloplasty without need for patient repositioning. J Endourol 2010;24:1571-4. [CrossRef] Olsen LH, Rawashdeh FF. Campbell- Walls Urology. Book Chapter 2016;133:3057-3074.e3. Liss ZJ, Olsen TM, Roelof BA, Steinhardt GF. Duration of urinary leakage after open non-stented dismem