KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Physics / 2018 / Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 5

Relativistic quantum mechanical spin-1 wave equation in 2 + 1 dimensional spacetime

Mustafa DERNEK
Semra GÜRTAŞ DOĞAN
Yusuf SUCU
Nuri ÜNAL
Sayfa
509–526
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

And, we see that the discussion on the Noether charge is a useful tool for understanding the pair production phenomenon because it is derived from a probabilistic particle current.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:In this study, we introduce a relativistic quantum mechanical wave equation of the spin-1 particle as an excited state of the zitterbewegung and show that it is consistent with the 2 + 1 dimensional Proca theory.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:At the same time, we see that in the rest frame, this equation has two eigenstates; particle and antiparticle states or negative and positive energy eigenstates, respectively, and satisfy SO(2,1) spin algebra.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:And, we see that the discussion on the Noether charge is a useful tool for understanding the pair production phenomenon because it is derived from a probabilistic particle current.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Spin-1 particle wave equation · Gravity · QED 2+1

Abstract

In this study, we introduce a relativistic quantum mechanical wave equation of the spin-1 particle as an excited state of the zitterbewegung and show that it is consistent with the 2 + 1 dimensional Proca theory. At the same time, we see that in the rest frame, this equation has two eigenstates; particle and antiparticle states or negative and positive energy eigenstates, respectively, and satisfy SO(2,1) spin algebra. As practical applications, we derive the exact solutions of the equation in the presence of a constant magnetic field and a curved spacetime background. From these solutions, we find Noether charge by integrating the zeroth component of the spin-1 particle current, called charge density, on hyper surface and discuss pair production from this charge. And, we see that the discussion on the Noether charge is a useful tool for understanding the pair production phenomenon because it is derived from a probabilistic particle current.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

DERNEK, M., DOĞAN, S. G., SUCU, Y., ÜNAL, N. (2018). Relativistic quantum mechanical spin-1 wave equation in 2 + 1 dimensional spacetime. Turkish Journal of Physics, Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 5, 509–526. https://ajindex.com/articles/377833

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (24)

  1. Witten, E. Nucl. Phys.B. 1988, 311, 46-78.
  2. Witten, E. Nucl. Phys.B. 1989, 323, 113-140.
  3. Witten, E. Commun. Math. Phys. 1989, 121, 351-399.
  4. Geim, A. K.; Novoselov, K.S. Nat. Mater. 2007, 6, 183-191.
  5. Binegar, B. J. Math. Phys. 1982, 23, 1511-1517.
  6. Witten, E. Commun. Math. Phys. 1991, 137, 29-66.
  7. Carlip, S. Quantum gravity in 2 + 1 dimensions; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 1998.
  8. Birmingham, D.; Sachs, I.; Sen, S. Phys. Lett. B 1997, 413, 281-286.
  9. Deser, S.; Jackiw, R.; t’Hooft, G. Ann. Phys. 1984, 152, 220-235.
  10. Deser, S.; Jackiw, R. Commun. Math. Phys. 1988, 118, 495-509. t’Hooft, G. Commun. Math. Phys. 1988, 117, 685-700.
  11. Banados, M.; Teitelboim, C.; Zanelli, J. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1992, 69, 1849-1851.
  12. Brill, D. Lect. Notes Phys. 2000, 537, 143-179.
  13. Obukhov, Y., Phys. Rev. D 2003, 68, 124015. Husain, V., Phys. Rev. D 1994, 50, R2361. Novoselov, K. S.; Geim, A. K.; Morozov, S. V.; Jiang, D.; Zhang, Y.; Dubonos, S. V.; Grigorieva, I. V.; Firsov, A. A. Science 2004, 306, 666-669.
  14. Castro Neto, A. H.; Guinea, F.; Peres, N. M. R.; Novoselov, K. S.; Geim, K. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2009, 81, 109-162.
  15. De Martino, A.; Dell’Anna, L.; Egger, R. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2007, 98, 066802. Kosinski, P.; Maslanka, P.; Slawinska, J.; Zasada, I. Prog. Theor. Phys. 2012, 128, 727-739.
  16. Bagan, E.; Lavelle, M.; McMullan, D. Phys. Lett. B 2000, 477, 355-360.
  17. Nogueira, F. S.; Kleinert, H. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2005, 95, 176406. Gavrilov, S. P.; Gitman, D. M. Phys. Rev. D 1996, 53, 7162-7175.
  18. Gavrilov, S. P.; Gitman, D. M.; Smirnov, A. A. J. Math. Phys. 2004, 45, 1873-1886.
  19. Khalilov, V. R. Phys. Rev. A 2005, 71, 012105. Khalilov, V. R. Eur. Phys. J. C 2014, 74, 3061. Khalilov, V. R.; Mamsurov, I. V. Eur. Phys. J. C 2015, 75, 167. Sucu, Y.; Ünal, N. J. Math. Phys. 2007, 48, 052503. Gecim, G.; Sucu, Y. J. Cosmol. Astropart. P. 2013, 2, 023. Gecim, G.; Sucu, Y. Astrophys. Space Sci. 2015, 357, 105. Gecim, G.; Kucukakca, Y; Sucu, Y. Adv. High Energy Phys. 2015, 2015, 567395. Gecim, G.; Sucu Y. Adv. High Energy Phys. 2017, 2017, 2056131. Petiau, G. Acad. Roy. de Belg. Classe Sci. Mem in 8 ◦ 16, 1936.
  20. Duffin, R. J. Phys. Rev. 1938, 54, 1114. Kemmer, N. Proc. Roy. Soc. A 1939, 173, 91-116.
  21. Nedjadi, Y.; Barrett, R. C. J. Phys. G 1993, 19, 87-98.
  22. Nedjadi, Y.; Barrett, R. C. J. Phys. A 1994, 27, 4301-4315.
  23. Nedjadi, Y.; Barrett, R. C. J. Math. Phys. 1994, 35, 4517-4533.
  24. Lunardi, J. T.; Pimentel, B. M.; Teixeiri, R. G.; Valverde, J. S. Phys. Lett