Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology / 2020 / Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 2

Patients’ perceptions toward and the driving factors of decision-making for opportunistic bilateral salpingectomy at the time of cesarean section

Sezaryen sırasında profilaktik bilateral salpenjektomiye hastaların bakış açısı ve kararlarını etkileyen faktörler

Sayfa
115–122
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The main driving factors influencing the decision of preferring OBS over tubal ligation were the risk-reducing effect for ovarian cancer and superior pregnancy prevention.Conclusion: The acceptance rate of OBS at the time of cesarean section was found to be very high, and it should therefore be offered at the time of cesarean section to women who desire permanent contraception.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: Enough data can be found in the literature regarding the protective effect of tubal ligation on gynecological cancers.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:In addition, a large body of evidence revealed that prophylactic bilateral salpingectomy had no significant negative effect on the ovarian function, quality of life, sexuality, surgery duration, and cost-effectivity.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The main driving factors influencing the decision of preferring OBS over tubal ligation were the risk-reducing effect for ovarian cancer and superior pregnancy prevention.Conclusion: The acceptance rate of OBS at the time of cesarean section was found to be very high, and it should therefore be offered at the time of cesarean section to women who desire permanent contraception.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Objective: Enough data can be found in the literature regarding the protective effect of tubal ligation on gynecological cancers. In addition, a large body of evidence revealed that prophylactic bilateral salpingectomy had no significant negative effect on the ovarian function, quality of life, sexuality, surgery duration, and cost-effectivity. This study was aimed at exploring the underlying factors that motivate women for either opportunistic bilateral salpingectomy (OBS) or tubal ligation, particularly focusing on their preferences, knowledge, and beliefs toward female sterilization, satisfaction from counseling, and body image following the salpingectomy.Materials and Methods: A total of 54 patients who had undergone surgical sterilization with either OBS or tubal ligation were included in this prospective cohort study. The acceptance rate of the OBS at the time of cesarean section among pregnant women seeking surgical sterilization was calculated. The underlying reasons for women’s acceptance or refusal for salpingectomy were assessed by a non-validated data collection tool that had 14 open-ended questions focusing on the women’s preferences, knowledge, beliefs toward female sterilization, satisfaction from counseling, and body image following the salpingectomy.Results: The acceptance rate of OBS at the time of cesarean section among pregnant women and electively among non-pregnant women were 93.5% (n=43/46) and 75% (6/8), respectively. The main driving factors influencing the decision of preferring OBS over tubal ligation were the risk-reducing effect for ovarian cancer and superior pregnancy prevention.Conclusion: The acceptance rate of OBS at the time of cesarean section was found to be very high, and it should therefore be offered at the time of cesarean section to women who desire permanent contraception.

Abstract

Amaç: Tubal ligasyonun jinekolojik kanserler üzerindeki koruyucu etkisi hakkında literatürde veriler vardır. Ayrıca, profilaktik bilateral salpinjektominin yumurtalık fonksiyonu, yaşam kalitesi, cinsellik, cerrahi süresi ve maliyet etkinliği üzerinde olumsuz bir etkisi olmadığı ortaya koyulmuştur. Bu çalışmada kadınların profilaktik bilateral salpinjektomi veya tubal ligasyon tercihlerini etkileyen faktörlerin araştırılması amaçlanmıştır. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Bu prospektif kohort çalışmaya profilaktik bilateral salpinjektomi veya tubal ligasyon ile cerrahi sterilizasyon uygulanan toplam 54 hasta dahil edildi. Cerrahi sterilizasyon isteyen gebe kadınlarda sezaryen anında profilaktik bilateral salpinjektomiyi tercih edenlerin oranı belirlendi. Kadınların salpinjektomiyi seçmesinin veya reddetmesinin altında yatan nedenler, 14 açık uçlu soru içeren bir form ile değerlendirildi. Bulgular: Gebelerin %93,5’i (n=43/46) gebe olmayan kadınların ise %75’i (6/8) sezaryen sırasında profilaktik bilateral salpinjektomiyi kabul etmişlerdir. Tubal ligasyon yerine profilaktik bilateral salpinjektomiyi tercih etmek için başlıca motivatörleri salfenjektominin over kanseri riskini azaltma ve kontrasepsiyondaki üstünlüğü olmuştur. Sonuç: Sezaryen sırasında profilaktik bilateral salpinjektomiyi kabul eden hastaların oranı yüksek bulunmuştur. Obstetrisyenler kalıcı kontrasepsiyon isteyen hastalara sezaryen sırasında profilaktik bilateral salpinjektomiyi önermelidirler.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

YASSA, M., PULATOĞLU, Ç. (2020). Patients’ perceptions toward and the driving factors of decision-making for opportunistic bilateral salpingectomy at the time of cesarean section. Turkish Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 2, 115–122. https://ajindex.com/articles/376180

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. Patil E, Jensen JT. Update on Permanent contraception options for women: Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2015;27:465-70
  2. Chan LM, Westhoff CL. Tubal sterilization trends in the United States. Fertil Steril 2010;94:1-6
  3. Peterson HB, Xia Z, Hughesa JM, Wilcox LS, Tylora LR, Trussell J. The risk of pregnancy after tubal sterilization: findings from the US Collaborative Review of Sterilization. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996;174:1161-8; discussion 1168-70
  4. Loghmani L, Saedi N, Omani-Samani R, Safiri S, Sepidarkish M, Maroufizadeh S, et al. Tubal ligation and endometrial Cancer risk: a global systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Cancer 2019;19:942
  5. Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, Rebelo M, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer 2015;136:E359-86
  6. Shih I-M, Kurman RJ. Ovarian tumorigenesis: a proposed model based on morphological and molecular genetic analysis. Am J Pathol 2004;164:1511-8
  7. Anggraeni TD, Al Fattah AN, Surya R. Prophylactic salpingectomy and ovarian cancer: an evidence-based analysis. South Asian J Cancer 2018;7:42-5
  8. Subramaniam A, Blanchard CT, Erickson BK, Szychowski J, Leath CA, Biggio JR, et al. Feasibility of complete salpingectomy compared with standard postpartum tubal ligation at cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2018;132:20-7
  9. Subramaniam A, Einerson BD, Blanchard CT, Erickson BK, Szychowski J, Leath III CA, et al. The cost-effectiveness of opportunistic salpingectomy versus standard tubal ligation at the time of cesarean delivery for ovarian cancer risk reduction. Gynecol Oncol 2019;152:127-32
  10. Subramaniam A, Blanchard C, Erickson B, Szychowski J, Leath C, Biggio J, et al. Factors associated with completion and physician and patient attitudes towards salpingectomy at the time of cesarean delivery. Gynecol Oncol 2018;149:77
  11. Piazza A, Schwirian K, Scott F, Wilson MD, Zite NB, Creinin MD. Women’s preferences for permanent contraception method and willingness to be randomized for a hypothetical trial. Contraception 2019;99:56-60
  12. Borrero S, Nikolajski C, Rodriguez KL, Creinin MD, Arnold RM, Ibrahim SA. “Everything I know I learned from my mother. or not”: perspectives of African-American and white women on decisions about tubal sterilization. J Gen Intern Med 2009;24:312-9
  13. Committee on Gynecologic Practice. Committee opinion no. 6