Our midterm restenosis results using patch angioplasty closure versus primary closure in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy: A comparative study
Restenosis was defined as a lesion of >70% in diameter.Results: During midterm follow-up, there was no statistically significant difference in the restenosis rate between the two surgical closuretechniques (p=0.729).Conclusion: Our study results show that the restenosis rate is similar using both closure techniques in patients undergoing CEA.
📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale
🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objectives: This study aims to compare midterm results of patch angioplasty with primary closure techniques in patients undergoing carotidendarterectomy (CEA) in terms of restenosis.Patients and methods: This prospective, single-center, randomized study included a total of 137 patients (42 females, 95 males; mean age64.4±8.8 years; range 36 to 86 years) who underwent CEA between January 2010 and October 2015.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The patients were divided into twogroups: the patch angioplasty group (n=70) and the primary closure group (n=67).
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Restenosis was defined as a lesion of >70% in diameter.Results: During midterm follow-up, there was no statistically significant difference in the restenosis rate between the two surgical closuretechniques (p=0.729).Conclusion: Our study results show that the restenosis rate is similar using both closure techniques in patients undergoing CEA.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2010 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri
Özet
Objectives: This study aims to compare midterm results of patch angioplasty with primary closure techniques in patients undergoing carotidendarterectomy (CEA) in terms of restenosis.Patients and methods: This prospective, single-center, randomized study included a total of 137 patients (42 females, 95 males; mean age64.4±8.8 years; range 36 to 86 years) who underwent CEA between January 2010 and October 2015. The patients were divided into twogroups: the patch angioplasty group (n=70) and the primary closure group (n=67). The mean follow-up was 2-7 years. Carotid computedtomography angiography was performed to evaluate restenosis. Restenosis was defined as a lesion of >70% in diameter.Results: During midterm follow-up, there was no statistically significant difference in the restenosis rate between the two surgical closuretechniques (p=0.729).Conclusion: Our study results show that the restenosis rate is similar using both closure techniques in patients undergoing CEA.
🔖
Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap
İYİGÜN, T., KYARUZİ, M., TİMUR, B., İYİGÜN, M., AYDIN, Ü. (2019). Our midterm restenosis results using patch angioplasty closure versus primary closure in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy: A comparative study. Turkish journal of vascular surgery, Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 1, 19–23. https://ajindex.com/articles/375799
Endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. Executive Committee for the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study. JAMA 1995;273:1421-8
AbuRahma AF. Processes of care for carotid endarterectomy: surgical and anesthesia considerations. J Vasc Surg 2009;50:921-33. 3. de Borst GJ, Zanen P, de Vries JP, van de Pavoordt ED, Ackerstaff RG, Moll FL. Durability of surgery for restenosis after carotid endarterectomy. J Vasc Surg 2008;47:363-71
Bond R, Rerkasem K, AbuRahma AF, Naylor AR, Rothwell PM. Patch angioplasty versus primary closure for carotid endarterectomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004;2:CD000160
Bond R, Rerkasem K, Naylor AR, Aburahma AF, Rothwell PM. Systematic review of randomized controlled trials of patch angioplasty versus primary closure and different types of patch materials during carotid endarterectomy. J Vasc Surg 2004;40:1126-35
Cheng I, Vyas KS, Velaga S, Davenport DL, Saha SP. Outcomes of Carotid Endarterectomy with Primary Closure. Int J Angiol 2017;26:83-8
Avgerinos ED, Chaer RA, Naddaf A, El-Shazly OM, Marone L, Makaroun MS. Primary closure after carotid endarterectomy is not inferior to other closure techniques. J Vasc Surg 2016;64:678-83
Archie JP Jr. Prevention of early restenosis and thrombosisocclusion after carotid endarterectomy by saphenous vein patch angioplasty. Stroke 1986;17:901-5
Eikelboom BC, Ackerstaff RG, Hoeneveld H, Ludwig JW, Teeuwen C, Vermeulen FE, et al. Benefits of carotid patching: a randomized study. J Vasc Surg 1988;7:240-7
Huizing E, Vos CG, Hulsebos RG, van den Akker PJ, Borst GJ, Ünlü Ç. Patch Angioplasty or Primary Closure Following Carotid Endarterectomy for Symptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis. Surg J (N Y) 2018;4:e96-e101
Murie JA, John TG, Morris PJ. Carotid endarterectomy in Great Britain and Ireland: practice between 1984 and 1992. Br J Surg 1994;81:827-31
Bernstein EF, Torem S, Dilley RB. Does carotid restenosis predict an increased risk of late symptoms, stroke, or death? Ann Surg 1990;212:629-36
Sarp Beyazpınar D, Harman A, Akovalı N, Ersoy Ö, Kayıpmaz Ç, Gültekin B, et al. Our treatment strategies of carotid artery restenoses. Damar Cer Derg 2018;27:71-7
Clagett GP, Rich NM, McDonald PT, Salander JM, Youkey JR, Olson DW, et al. Etiologic factors for recurrent carotid artery stenosis. Surgery 1983;93:313-8
Rossi PJ, Valentine RJ, Myers SI, Brillant PT, Chervu A, Clagett GP. The durability of bilateral carotid endarterectomy.