Dergiler / Turkish journal of physical medicine and rehabilitation / 2020 / Cilt: 66 - Sayı: 2

A comparison of application frequency of physical therapy modalities in patients with chronic mechanical low back pain

Sayfa
201–209
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

However, physical therapy protocol applied twice a week yields more improvement, indicating that it is more advantageous with less cost and lost workdays

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objectives: This study aims to evaluate the effects of physical therapy modalities five days a week versus twice a week with a three-day interval on pain, depression, and functional disability in patients with chronic mechanical low back pain.Patients and methods: Between June 2018 and November 2018, a total of 60 patients (39 females, 21 males; mean age 41.0±6.8 years; range, 25 to 55 years) with chronic mechanical low back pain were included.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The patients were divided into two groups: Group 1 (n=30) received physical therapy five days a week for a total of 15 sessions, while Group 2 (n=30) received physical therapy twice a week with a three-day interval for a total of six sessions.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:However, physical therapy protocol applied twice a week yields more improvement, indicating that it is more advantageous with less cost and lost workdays
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2018 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Objectives: This study aims to evaluate the effects of physical therapy modalities five days a week versus twice a week with a three-day interval on pain, depression, and functional disability in patients with chronic mechanical low back pain.Patients and methods: Between June 2018 and November 2018, a total of 60 patients (39 females, 21 males; mean age 41.0±6.8 years; range, 25 to 55 years) with chronic mechanical low back pain were included. The patients were divided into two groups: Group 1 (n=30) received physical therapy five days a week for a total of 15 sessions, while Group 2 (n=30) received physical therapy twice a week with a three-day interval for a total of six sessions. Per protocol, all patients were applied hot pack for 20 min, followed by conventional transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for 20 min and therapeutic ultrasound (US) for 10 min in each session. All patients were given exercise training and were instructed to do twice a day up to four weeks after the completion of physical therapy sessions. The severity of low back pain was evaluated using the visual analog scale (VAS), the severity of depression using the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), and functional disability using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). All patients were evaluated before and after physical therapy and at four weeks. Theresults were compared between the groups.Results: There was no statistically significant difference in the age, gender, body mass index, occupation, VAS, BDI, and ODI scores at the time of randomization (p>0.05). Intra-group analysis showed a significant improvement in all parameters after physical therapy compared to pre-treatment values and at four weeks compared to the post-treatment values (p 0.05).Conclusion: Our study results suggest that both physical therapy modalities applied five days week and twice a week are effective in pain, depression, and functional disability. However, physical therapy protocol applied twice a week yields more improvement, indicating that it is more advantageous with less cost and lost workdays

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ALTINBİLEK, T., MURAT, S. (2020). A comparison of application frequency of physical therapy modalities in patients with chronic mechanical low back pain. Turkish journal of physical medicine and rehabilitation, Cilt: 66 - Sayı: 2, 201–209. https://ajindex.com/articles/375271

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (16)

  1. Ay S, Evcik D. Kronik bel ağrılı hastalarda depresyon ve yaşam kalitesi. Fiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon Anabilim Dalı. Ankara Yeni Tıp Dergisi 2008;25:228-31
  2. Almeida DC, Kraychete DC. Low back pain-a diagnostic approach. Rev Dor SãoPaulo 2017;18:173-7
  3. Ambrose KR, Golightly YM. Physical exercise as nonpharmacological treatment of chronic pain: Why and when. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2015;29:120-30
  4. Olafsson G, Jonsson E, Fritzell P, Hägg O, Borgström F. Cost of low back pain: results from a national register study in Sweden. Eur Spine J 2018;27:2875-81
  5. Akarırmak Ü, Erden G. Bel ağrılarında konservatif tedavi. Clinic Medicine 2007;1:40-6
  6. Hayashi Y. Classification, diagnosis, and treatment of low back pain. JMAJ 2004;47:227-3
  7. Narin S, Bozan Ö, Cankurtaran F, Bakırhan S. Kronik bel ağrılı hastalarda fizyoterapi programının fonksiyonel kapasite ve yaşam kalitesi üzerine etkisi. DEU Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi 2008;22:137-43
  8. Şahin N, Albayrak İ, Karahan AY, Uğurlu H. Kronik bel ağrılı hastalarda fizik. tedavinin etkinliği, Genel Tıp Derg 2011;21:17-20
  9. Günaydın R. General physical therapy applications for elderly people. Turk J Phys Med Rehab 2009;55(Suppl 2):85-7
  10. Koldaş Doğan S, Sonel Tur B, Kurtaiş Y, Atay MB. Comparison of three different approaches in the treatment of chronic low back pain. Clin Rheumatol 2008;27:873-81
  11. Gracey JH, McDonough SM, Baxter GD. Physiotherapy management of low back pain: a survey of current practice in northern Ireland. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2002;27:406-11
  12. Clair DA, Edmondston SJ, Allison GT. Physical therapy treatment dose for nontraumatic neck pain: a comparison between 2 patient groups. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2006;36:867-75
  13. Mitchell JM, de Lissovoy G. A comparison of resource use and cost in direct access versus physician referral episodes of physical therapy. Phys Ther 1997;77:10-8
  14. Zuijderduin W, Dekker J, Abrahamse H. Determinants of the number of sessions in a physical therapeutic treatment. Tijdschr Soc Gezondheidsz 1995;73:274-81. [Abstract] 15. Swinkels IC, Wimmers RH, Groenewegen PP, van den Bosch WJ, Dekker J, van den Ende CH. What factors explain the number of physical therapy treatment sessions in patients referred with low back pain; a multilevel analysis. BMC Health Serv Res 2005;5:74
  15. Atalay NS, Akkaya N, Konukcu S, Balci CS, Sahin F. Psychic predictors of outcomes of physical therapy. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil 2013;26:71-7
  16. Hatungil R. Stres ve d