Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Mathematics and Computer Science / 2018 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 9

Comparative Study of Algebraic Wall Model and Differential Equation Wall Model in Large Eddy Simulation of Turbulent Channel Flow

Sayfa
80–90
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Comparing the results throughout the calculation domain we have found that the results from the LES with DEWM (LES-DEWM) approach show closer agreement with the DNS results.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:A large eddy simulation (LES) is performed in a plane turbulent channel flow, where the near wall region is approximated by algebraic wall model (AWM) and differential equation wall model (DEWM).
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The simulation is performed by using a finite difference method of second order accuracy in space and a low-storage explicit Runge-Kutta method with third order accuracy in time.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Comparing the results throughout the calculation domain we have found that the results from the LES with DEWM (LES-DEWM) approach show closer agreement with the DNS results.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Large eddy simulation · turbulent channel flow · algebraic wall model

Abstract

A large eddy simulation (LES) is performed in a plane turbulent channel flow, where the near wall region is approximated by algebraic wall model (AWM) and differential equation wall model (DEWM). The simulation is performed by using a finite difference method of second order accuracy in space and a low-storage explicit Runge-Kutta method with third order accuracy in time. The computational results are compared with those from direct numerical simulation (DNS) data. Comparing the results throughout the calculation domain we have found that the results from the LES with DEWM (LES-DEWM) approach show closer agreement with the DNS results.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

MALLİK, M. S. I., HOQUE, M. A., UDDİN, A. (2018). Comparative Study of Algebraic Wall Model and Differential Equation Wall Model in Large Eddy Simulation of Turbulent Channel Flow. Turkish Journal of Mathematics and Computer Science, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 9, 80–90. https://ajindex.com/articles/374705

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (19)

  1. Anderson, Jr. J. D., Computational Fluid Dynamics, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1995.
  2. Balaras, E., Benocci, C., Piomelli, U., Two-layer approximate boundary conditions for large-eddy simulations, AIAA J., 34(6)(1996), 1111-1119.
  3. Cabot, W., Large-Eddy Simulations with Wall Models, In: Annual Research Briefs 1995,
  4. Center for Turbulence Research, Stanford University, CA, 1995, 41-50.
  5. Cabot, W., Moin, P., Approximate Wall Boundary Conditions in the Large-Eddy Simulation of High Reynolds Number Flow, J. Flow Turbulence Combust., 63(2000), 269-291.
  6. Dritselis, C. D., Large eddy simulation of turbulent channel flow with transverse roughness elements on one wall, Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow, 50(2014), 225-239.
  7. Ferziger, J. H., Peric', M., Computational Methods for Fluid Dynamics, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2002.
  8. Grotzbach, G., Direct numerical and large eddy simulation of turbulent channel flows, In: Encyclopedia of Fluid Mechanics 1987,
  9. Cheremisinoff, NP ed: Gulf Pub, Chap. 34, 1987, 1337-1391.
  10. Ham, F. E., Lien, F. S., Strong, A. B., A Fully Conservative Second-Order Finite Difference Scheme for Incompressible Flow on Nonuniform Grids, J. Comput. Phys., 177(2002), 117-133.
  11. Harlow, F. H., Welch, J. E., Numerical calculation of time-dependent viscous incompressible flow with free surface, Phys. Fluids, 8(12)(1965), 2182-2189.
  12. Johnson, D. B., Raad, P. E., Chen, S., Simulation of impacts of fluid free surfaces with solid boundaries, Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids, 19(2)(1994), 153-176.
  13. Kennedy, C. A., Carpenter, M. H., Lewis, R. M., Low-storage, explicit Runge-Kutta schemes for the compressible Navier-Stokes equations, Appl. Numer. Math., 35(2000), 177-219.
  14. Kianejad, S. S., Ansarifard, N., Numerical Simulation of Turbulent Boundary Layers of Surfaces Covered with Foul Release and Antifouling Coatings, J. Nav. Arch. Marine Eng., 13(2016), 17-26.
  15. Kim, J., Moin, P., Moser, R., Turbulence statistics in fully developed channel flow at low Reynolds number, J. Fluid Mech., 177(1987), 133-166.
  16. Mallik, M. S. I., Uddin, M. A., Large Eddy Simulation of Turbulent Channel Flow using Algebraic Wall Model, J. Kor. Soc. Ind. Appl. Math., 20(1)(2016), 37-50.
  17. Mallik, M. S. I., Uddin, M. A., Meah, M. A., Large Eddy Simulation of Turbulent Channel Flow at Reτ= 590, IOSR J. Math., 10(6)(2014), 41-50.
  18. Mallik, M. S. I., Uddin, M. A.,Rahman, M. A., Direct Numerical Simulation in Two Dimensional Homogeneous Isotropic Turbulence using Spectral Method, J. Sci. Res., 5(3)(2013), 435-445.
  19. Morinishi, Y., Skew-