Dergiler / Turkish archives of otorhinolaryngology / 2020 / Cilt: 58 - Sayı: 3

Conventional and Diffusion-Weighted MR Imaging Findings of Parotid Gland Tumors

Sayfa
174–180
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Conclusion: ADC measurements are useful for the differentiation of PA from both WT and MT; and can be used as a complementary tool to predict the histopathology in the preoperative planning of parotid tumors.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: To investigate diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings of parotid gland lesions in addition to conventional MRI findings and demographic data.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Methods: A retrospective evaluation was made of the demographic data, histopathologic data, preoperative conventional and diffusion-weighted MRI of 74 patients who underwent parotidectomy.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Conclusion: ADC measurements are useful for the differentiation of PA from both WT and MT; and can be used as a complementary tool to predict the histopathology in the preoperative planning of parotid tumors.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Objective: To investigate diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings of parotid gland lesions in addition to conventional MRI findings and demographic data. Methods: A retrospective evaluation was made of the demographic data, histopathologic data, preoperative conventional and diffusion-weighted MRI of 74 patients who underwent parotidectomy. The patients were categorized according to the histopathology (pleomorphic adenoma [PA], Warthin’s Tumor [WT] and malignant Tumor [MT]). Results: Histologically, 30 patients had PA, 27 patients had WT, and the remaining 17 patients had MT. The mean age of the PA, WT and MT groups were 44±21 (20-72), 55±10 (41-71) and 62±20 (21- 76) years, respectively. The WT (81%) and MT (70%) groups were male dominant, while the PA group showed female dominance (55%). The PA group showed statistically significant difference in terms of age (p<0.05) and gender (p=0.009) compared to the other two groups. The median apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values for the PA, WT and MT groups were 1.99±0.94 (1.10-2.41) x 10-3 mm2 /s, 0.92±0.35 (0.21-1.79) x 10-3 mm2 /s and 1.20±0.34 (0.78-1.47) x 10-3 mm2 /s, respectively. PA was differentiated from the other two groups (p=0.001). The sensitivity and specificity for distinguishing PAs from WT was 97% and 85%, respectively, when the ADC cutoff value was 1.25; and for distinguishing PAs from MT was 77% and 83%, respectively, when the ADC cutoff value was 1.35. Conclusion: ADC measurements are useful for the differentiation of PA from both WT and MT; and can be used as a complementary tool to predict the histopathology in the preoperative planning of parotid tumors.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ERAVCI, F. C., CILIZ, D. S., ÖZCAN, K. M., ÇOLAK, M., ÇAVUŞOĞLU, M., KARAKURT, S. E., KARAKUŞ, M. F. (2020). Conventional and Diffusion-Weighted MR Imaging Findings of Parotid Gland Tumors. Turkish archives of otorhinolaryngology, Cilt: 58 - Sayı: 3, 174–180. https://ajindex.com/articles/373946

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (2)

  1. Barnes L, Eveson JW, Reichart P, Sidransky D, editors. World Health Organization classification of tumours. Pathology and genetics of the head and neck tumours. Lyon: IARC Press; 2005.p.209-81
  2. Lobo R, Hawk J, Srinivasan A. A review of salivary gland malignancies: common histologic types, anatomic considerations, and imaging strategies. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 2018; 28: 171-82. [Crossref] 3. Wang CW, Chu YH, Chiu DY, Shin N, Hsu HH, Lee JC, et al. JOURNAL CLUB: The Warthin tumor score: a simple and reliable method to distinguish Warthin tumors from pleomorphic adenomas and carcinomas. Am J Roentgenol 2018; 210: 1330-7. [Crossref] 4. Christe A, Waldherr C, Hallett R, Zbaeren P, Thoeny H. MR imaging of parotid tumors: typical lesion characteristics in MR imaging improve discrimination between benign and malignant disease. Am J Neuroradiol 2011; 32: 1202-7. [Crossref] 5. Seethala RR, LiVolsi VA, Baloch ZW. Relative accuracy of fine-needle aspiration and frozen section in the diagnosis of lesions of the parotid gland. Head Neck 2005; 27: 217-23. [Crossref] 6. Gudmundsson JK, Ajan A, Abtahi J. The accuracy of fine-needle aspiration cytology for diagnosis of parotid gland masses: a clinicopathological study of 114 patients. J Appl Oral Sci 2016; 24: 561-7. [Crossref] 7. Supriya M, Denholm S, Palmer T. Seeding of tumor cells after fine needle aspiration cytology in benign parotid tumor: a case report and literature review. Laryngoscope 2008; 118: 263-5. [Crossref] 8. Koyuncu M, Şeşen T, Akan H, Ismailoglu AA, Tanyeri Y, Tekat A, et al. Comparison of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of parotid tumors. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2003; 129: 726-32. [Crossref] 9. Matsushima N, Maeda M, Takamura M, Takeda K. Apparent diffusion coefficients of benign and malignant salivary gland tumors. Comparison to histopathological findings. J Neuroradiol 2007; 34: 183-9. [Crossref] 10. Eida S, Sumi M, Nakamura T. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for the differentiation between benign and malignant salivary gland tumors. J Magn Reson Imaging 2010; 31: 673- 9. [Crossref] 11. Karaman CZ, Tanyeri A, Ozgur R. Parotid gland tumors: comparison of conventional and diffusion-weighted MR imaging findings with histopathological results. Turk J Radiol 2018; 36: 60-8. [Crossref] 12. Eida S, Sumi M, Sakihama N, Takahashi H, Nakamura T. Apparent diffusion coefficient mapping of salivary gland tumors: prediction of the benignancy and malignancy. Am