KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Pazarlama ve Pazarlama Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 2

The Mediating Role of Social And Environmental Responsibility in The Relationship Between Material Values, Consumer Cynicism and Product/Service Quality

Çağla Pınar UTKUTUĞ
Sayfa
213–237
Yayın Tarihi
2021-05-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

This study provides important contributions to the marketing literature because this model has sustained the elaborative understanding of consumer reactions at the product level and at the corporate and industry levels.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This paper aims to analyze the mediating role of corporates’ social and environmental responsibility in the relationship between material values, consumer cynicism, and product/ service quality.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:In the present study, data related to 16 popular clothing brands were gathered by means of a questionnaire filled out by 805 young consumers.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:This study provides important contributions to the marketing literature because this model has sustained the elaborative understanding of consumer reactions at the product level and at the corporate and industry levels.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Material values · cynicism · social and environmental responsibility

Özet

This paper aims to analyze the mediating role of corporates’ social and environmental responsibility in the relationship between material values, consumer cynicism, and product/ service quality. In the present study, data related to 16 popular clothing brands were gathered by means of a questionnaire filled out by 805 young consumers. Findings revealed that material values encourage positive evaluations of perceived product/ service quality with the mediating role of corporates’ social and environmental responsibility, whereas cynicism leads to negative appraisals of product/ service quality without the mediating role of social and environmental responsibility. This study provides important contributions to the marketing literature because this model has sustained the elaborative understanding of consumer reactions at the product level and at the corporate and industry levels.

Abstract

This paper aims to analyze the mediating role of corporates’ social and environmental responsibility in the relationship between material values, consumer cynicism, and product/ service quality. In the present study, data related to 16 popular clothing brands were gathered by means of a questionnaire filled out by 805 young consumers. Findings revealed that material values encourage positive evaluations of perceived product/ service quality with the mediating role of corporates’ social and environmental responsibility, whereas cynicism leads to negative appraisals of product/ service quality without the mediating role of social and environmental responsibility. This study provides important contributions to the marketing literature because this model has sustained the elaborative understanding of consumer reactions at the product level and at the corporate and industry levels.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

UTKUTUĞ, Ç. P. (2021). The Mediating Role of Social And Environmental Responsibility in The Relationship Between Material Values, Consumer Cynicism and Product/Service Quality. Pazarlama ve Pazarlama Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 2, 213–237. https://ajindex.com/articles/372180

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (12)

  1. Ambler, T. (2003). Marketing and the Bottom Line: Creating the Measures of Success. London: Financial Times/ Prentice Hall. Andreasen, A. R. (1996). Profits for nonprofits: Find a corporate partner. Harvard Business Review, 74(6), 47-50.
  2. Aqueveque, C. and Encina, C. (2010). Corporate behavior, social cynicism, and their effect on individuals’ perceptions of the company. Journal of Business Ethics, 91(2): 311-324.
  3. Archimi, C. S., Reynaud, E., Yasin, H. M., & Bhatti, Z. A. (2018). How perceived corporate social responsibility affects employee cynicism: The mediating role of organizational trust. Journal of Business Ethics, 151(4), 907-921.
  4. Ashforth, B. E., Harrison, S. H., & Corley, K. G. (2008). Identification in organizations: An examination of four fundamental questions. Journal of Management, 34(3), 325-374.
  5. Ashforth, B. E., & Gibbs, B. W. (1990). The double-edge of organizational legitimation. Organization science, 1(2), 177-194.
  6. Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of The Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74-94.
  7. Balliet, D., Wu, J., & De Dreu, C. K. (2014). Ingroup favoritism in cooperation: a meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 140(6), 1556. Banerjee, B., & McKeage, K. (1994). How green is my value: exploring the relationship between environmentalism and materialism. ACR North American Advances. Bansal, P., & Roth, K. (2000). Why companies go green: A model of ecological responsiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 717-736.
  8. Bearden, W. O., Netemeyer, R. G., & Teel, J. E. (1989). Measurement of consumer susceptibility to interpersonal influence. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(4), 473-481.
  9. Belk, R. W. (1985). Materialism: Trait aspects of living in the material world. Journal of Consumer Research, 12(3), 265-280.
  10. Berens, G., Riel, C. B. V., & Bruggen, G. H. V. (2005). Corporate associations and consumer product responses: The moderating role of corporate brand dominance. Journal of Marketing, 69(3), 35-48.
  11. Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2003). Consumer–company identification: a framework for understanding consumers’ relationships with companies. Journal of Marketing, 67(2), 76−88. Bozoklu, C. P. (2018). The Effects of Social Responsibility Activities on Stakeholders’ Purchase Intention. Business and Economics Research Journal, 9(4), 889-900.
  12. Bozoklu, Ç. P., & Ermeç, A. (2020). Tüketici Sinisizmi Ölçeği’nin Türkçe’ye Uyarlanması: Güvenilirlik ve Geçerlilik Araştırması. Ankara Hacı Bay