KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation / 2020 / Cilt: 48 - Sayı: 5

The ‘Cross-Legged Foetal Sitting Neuraxial Position’: Is it Beneficial?-A Prospective Randomised Clinical Trial Via Ultrasonography

Fatma Ferda KARTUFAN
Emrah KARATAY
Nurcan KIZILCIK
Özge KÖNER
Sayfa
371–378
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Only ISGO was found to be significantly broader in the male participant group (p=0.01) and in the BMI ≥25 group (p=0.02) according to CFSP–SFP.Conclusion: Considering all ultrasonographic anatomical measurements and according to the 5-NRS related to LC, the CFSP appears to be more advantageous than the SFP as a neuraxial positioning technique.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: The primary aim of the present study was to compare the ‘cross-legged foetal sitting position’ (CFSP) with the ‘sitting foetal position’ (SFP) sonographically.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:A total of 50 healthy volunteers were included in the study.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Only ISGO was found to be significantly broader in the male participant group (p=0.01) and in the BMI ≥25 group (p=0.02) according to CFSP–SFP.Conclusion: Considering all ultrasonographic anatomical measurements and according to the 5-NRS related to LC, the CFSP appears to be more advantageous than the SFP as a neuraxial positioning technique.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Objective: The primary aim of the present study was to compare the ‘cross-legged foetal sitting position’ (CFSP) with the ‘sitting foetal position’ (SFP) sonographically. The secondary aim was to compare their comfort.Methods: A randomised, consecutive controlled, single-blinded trial was performed in Yeditepe University. A total of 50 healthy volunteers were included in the study. Exclusion criteria were body mass index (BMI) >40 kg m-2, lumbar hernia, scoliosis, history of spine surgery, lower back pain or trauma, especially pelvic or knee problems related to arthropathy and not able to do one/both of the two position techniques. The two positioning techniques were evaluated by ultrasonography (USG) and 5-point Numerical Rating Scale (5-NRS) patient satisfaction of comfort questionnaire. Seven outcomes via USG were evaluated, subcutaneous tissue (ST), skin to spinous process (S–SP), transverse diameters of right and left paraspinal muscles (RPM and LPM), interspinous gap opening (ISGO), mean of bilateral paraspinal muscle (MPM) and CFSP–SFP change (CFSP–SFP). Stretcher comfort, position comfort, lumbar comfort (LC) and abdominal comfort (AC) were evaluated by participants with the 5-NRS.Results: In the CFSP, the mean ST and S–SP were significantly (p<0.0001) shorter, and LPM, RPM and MPM were significantly (p<0.0001) wider. The mean ISGO in the CFSP was significantly (p<0.0001) broader. The CFSP was significantly more comfortable than the SFP according to the LC (p=0.02). Only ISGO was found to be significantly broader in the male participant group (p=0.01) and in the BMI ≥25 group (p=0.02) according to CFSP–SFP.Conclusion: Considering all ultrasonographic anatomical measurements and according to the 5-NRS related to LC, the CFSP appears to be more advantageous than the SFP as a neuraxial positioning technique.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

KARTUFAN, F. F., KARATAY, E., KIZILCIK, N., KÖNER, Ö. (2020). The ‘Cross-Legged Foetal Sitting Neuraxial Position’: Is it Beneficial?-A Prospective Randomised Clinical Trial Via Ultrasonography. Turkish Journal of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, Cilt: 48 - Sayı: 5, 371–378. https://ajindex.com/articles/370092

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (4)

  1. Perna P, Gioia A, Ragazzi R, Volta CA, Innamorato M. Can pre-procedure neuroaxial ultrasound improve the identification of the potential epidural space when compared with anatomical landmarks? A prospective randomized study. Minerva Anestesiol 2017; 83: 41-9
  2. Shankar H, Rajput K, Murugiah K. Correlation between spinous process dimensions and ease of spinal anaesthesia. Indian J Anaesth 2012; 56: 250-4. [CrossRef] 3. Schultz J, Njaa M, Spahn T, Auyong D, Habib A, Panni M. Mid-calf position-an improved technique to place neuraxial anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth 2006; 97: 583-4. [CrossRef] 4. Dimaculangan DP, Mazer JA, Maracaja-Neto LF. Sonographic evaluation of lumbar interlaminar space opening in a variety of patient body positions for optimal neuraxial anesthesia delivery. J Clin Anesth 2016; 34: 159-5. [CrossRef] 5. Chin KJ, Karmakar MK, Peng P. Ultrasonography of the Adult Thoracic and Lumbar Spine for Central Neuraxial Blockade. Anesthesiology 2011; 114: 1459-85. [CrossRef] 6. Grau T. The evaluation of ultrasound imaging for neuraxial anesthesia.Can J Anesth 2003; 50(Suppl 1): 30. [CrossRef] 7. Bonazzi M, Bianchi De Grazia L, Di Gennaro S, Lensi C, Migliavacca S, Marsicano M, et al. Ultrasonography-guided identification of the lumbar epidural space. Minerva Anestesiol 1995; 61: 201-5
  3. Duniec L, Nowakowski P, Kosson D, Łazowski T. Anatomical landmarks based assessment of intravertebral space level for lumbar puncture is misleading in more than 30%. Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther 2013; 45: 1-6. [CrossRef] 9. Cohen L, Manion L, Morrison. Research Methods in Education, Sixth Edition 2007; 104
  4. Perlas A, Chaparro L, Chin K. Lumbar Neuraxial Ultrasound for Spinal and Epidural Anesthesia. Obstetric Anesthesia Digest 2016; 36: 126-7. [CrossRef] 11. Srinivasan KK, Iohom G, Loughnane F, Lee PJ. Conventional Landmark-Guided Midline Versus Preprocedure Ultrasound-Guided Paramedian Techniques in Spinal Anesthesia. Anesth Analg 2015; 121: 1089-6. [CrossRef] 12. Locks GD, Almeida MC, Pereira AA. Use of the Ultrasound to Determine the Level of Lumbar Puncture in Pregnant Women. Rev Bras Anestesiol 2010; 60: 13-9. [CrossRef] 13. Shaikh F, Brzezinski J, Alexander S, Arzola C, Carvalho JC, Beyene J, et al. Ultrasound Imaging for Lumbar Punctures and Epidural Catheterizations. Obstetric Anesthesia Digest 2014; 34: 71-2. [CrossRef] 14. Sandoval M, Shestak W, Stürmann K, Hsu C. Optimal patient position for lumbar puncture, measured by ultrasonography. Emerg Radiol 2004;