Dergiler / The Anatolian Journal of Cardiology / 2016 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 9

Late deterioration of left ventricular function after right ventricular pacemaker implantation

Sayfa
678–683
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Conclusion: Upgrading to CRT may be beneficial in patients with DCPs and heart failure induced by a high RV pacing percentage.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objectives: Right ventricular (RV) pacing induces a left bundle branch block pattern on ECG and may promote heart failure.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:This study analyzes whether upgrading DCP to CRT with the additional implantation of a left ventricular (LV) lead improves LV function in patients with reduced LVEF following DCP implantation.Methods: Twenty-two patients (13 males) implanted with DCPs and a high RV pacing percentage (>90%) were evaluated in term of new-onset heart failure symptoms.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Conclusion: Upgrading to CRT may be beneficial in patients with DCPs and heart failure induced by a high RV pacing percentage.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Objectives: Right ventricular (RV) pacing induces a left bundle branch block pattern on ECG and may promote heart failure. Patients with dual chamber pacemakers (DCPs) who present with progressive reduction in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) secondary to RV pacing are candidates for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). This study analyzes whether upgrading DCP to CRT with the additional implantation of a left ventricular (LV) lead improves LV function in patients with reduced LVEF following DCP implantation.Methods: Twenty-two patients (13 males) implanted with DCPs and a high RV pacing percentage (>90%) were evaluated in term of new-onset heart failure symptoms. The patients were enrolled in this retrospective single-center study after obvious causes for a reduced LVEF were excluded with echocardiography and coronary angiography. In all patients, DCPs were then upgraded to biventricular devices. LVEF was analyzed with a two-sided t-test. QRS duration and brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels were analyzed with the unpaired t-test.Results: LVEF declined after DCP implantation from 54±10% to 31±7%, and the mean QRS duration was 161±20 ms during RV pacing. NT-pro BNP levels were elevated (3365±11436 pmol/L). After upgrading to a biventricular device, a biventricular pacing percentage of 98.1±2% was achieved. QRS duration decreased to 108±16 ms and 106±20 ms after 1 and 6 months, respectively. There was a significant increase in LVEF to 38±8% and 41±11% and a decrease in NT-pro BNP levels to 3088±2326 pmol/L and 1860±1838 pmol/L at 1 and 6 months, respectively. Conclusion: Upgrading to CRT may be beneficial in patients with DCPs and heart failure induced by a high RV pacing percentage.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

BELLMANN, B., MUNTEAN, B. G., LİN, T., GEMEİN, C., SCHMİTZ, K., SCHAUERTE, P. (2016). Late deterioration of left ventricular function after right ventricular pacemaker implantation. The Anatolian Journal of Cardiology, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 9, 678–683. https://ajindex.com/articles/367249

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (10)

  1. Epstein AE, Di Marco JP, Ellenbogen KA, Estes NA 3rd, Freedman RA, Gettes LS, et al.; American College of Cardiology Foundation; American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines; 2012 ACCF/AHA/HRS focused update incorporated into the ACCF/ AHA/HRS 2008 guidelines for device-based therapy of cardiac rhythm abnormalities: a report of the American College of Cardiolo- gy Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. Heart Rhythm Society. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013; 22: 6-75.
  2. Yu CM, Chan JY, Zhang Q, Omar R, Yip GW, Hussin A, et al. Biven- tricular pacing in patients with bradycardia and normal ejection fraction. N Engl J Med 2009; 361: 2123-34.
  3. Akerström F, Pachón M, Puchol A, Jiménez-López J, Segovia D, Ro- dríguez-Padial L et al. Chronic right ventricular apical pacing: ad- verse effects and current therapeutic strategies to minimize them. Int J Cardiol 2014; 173: 351-60.
  4. Lumens J, Ploux S, Strik M, Gorcsan J 3rd, Cochet H, Derval N, et al. Comparative electromechanical and hemodynamic effects of left ventricular and biventricular pacing in dyssynchronous heart failure: electrical resynchronization versus left-right ventricular interaction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013; 62: 2395-403.
  5. Adomian GE, Beazell J. Myofibrillar disarray produced in normal hearts by chronic electrical pacing. Am Heart J 1986; 112: 79-83.
  6. Leclercq C, Gras D, Le Helloco A, Nicol L, Mabo P, Daubert C. Hemody- namic importance of preserving the normal sequence of ventricular activation in permanent cardiac pacing. Am Heart J 1995; 129: 1133-41.
  7. Tops LF, Schalij MJ, Bax JJ. The effects of right ventricular apical pacing on ventricular function and dyssynchrony implications for therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009; 54: 764-76.
  8. Sharma AD, Rizo-Patron C, Hallstorm AP, O'Neill GP, Rothbart S, Martins JB, et al. Percent right ventricular pacing predicts out- comes in the DAVID trial. Heart rhythm 2005; 2: 830-4.
  9. Curtis AB, Worley SJ, Adamson PB, Chung ES, Niazi I, Sherfesee L, et al; Biventricular versus Right Ventricular Pacing in Heart Failure Patients with Atrioventricular Block (BLOCK HF) Trial Investigators. Biventricular pacing for atrioventricular block and systolic dys- function. N Engl J Med 2013; 368: 1585-93.
  10. Chen L, Hodge D, Jahangir A, Özcan C, Trusty J, Friedman P, et al. Preserved left ventricular ejection fraction following atrioventricu- lar junction ablation and pacing for atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 20