Dergiler / The Anatolian Journal of Cardiology / 2017 / Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 4

The outcomes of intravascular ultrasound-guided drug-eluting stent implantation among patients with complex coronary lesions: a comprehensive meta-analysis of 15 clinical trials and 8,084 patients

Sayfa
258–268
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

More large and powerful randomized trials are still warranted to guide stenting decision making

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: The effects of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation in patients with complex coronary artery lesions remains to be controversial.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The incidence of definite/probable stent thrombosis (ST) was analyzed as the safety endpoint.Results: Fifteen clinical trials involving 8.084 patients were analyzed.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:More large and powerful randomized trials are still warranted to guide stenting decision making
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Objective: The effects of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation in patients with complex coronary artery lesions remains to be controversial. This study sought to evaluate the outcomes of IVUS guidance in these patients.Methods: The EMBASE, Medline, and other internet sources were searched for relevant articles. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac events (MACE), including all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), and target-vessel revascularization (TVR). The incidence of definite/probable stent thrombosis (ST) was analyzed as the safety endpoint.Results: Fifteen clinical trials involving 8.084 patients were analyzed. MACE risk was significantly decreased following IVUS-guided DES implantation compared with coronary angiography (CAG) guidance (odds ratio [OR] 0.63, 95% confidence intervals [CI]: 0.53–0.73, p<0.001), which might mainly result from the lower all-cause mortality risk (OR 0.52, 95% CI: 0.40–0.67, p<0.001), MI (OR 0.70, 95% CI: 0.56–0.86, p=0.001), and TVR (OR 0.53, 95% CI: 0.40–0.70, p<0.001). The subgroup analyses indicated better outcomes of IVUS guidance in DES implantation for these patients with left main disease or bifurcation lesions.Conclusion: IVUS guidance in DES implantation is associated with a significant reduction in MACE risk in patients with complex lesions, particularly those with left main disease or bifurcation lesions. More large and powerful randomized trials are still warranted to guide stenting decision making

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

CHEN, S., TİAN1, N. 2., GAO, Y., SHAO1, M., GAO1, X., Lİ1, X., FAN1, Z. (2017). The outcomes of intravascular ultrasound-guided drug-eluting stent implantation among patients with complex coronary lesions: a comprehensive meta-analysis of 15 clinical trials and 8,084 patients. The Anatolian Journal of Cardiology, Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 4, 258–268. https://ajindex.com/articles/367232

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (11)

  1. Stone GW, Moses JW, Ellis SG, Schofer J, Dawkins KD, Morice MC, et al. Safety and efficacy of sirolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting coro- nary stents. N Engl J Med 2007; 356: 998-1008.
  2. Amsterdam EA, Wenger NK, Brindis RG, Casey DE Jr, Ganiats TG, Holmes DR, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: ex- ecutive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/ American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation 2014; 130: 2354-94.
  3. Windecker S, Kolh P, Alfonso F, Collet JP, Cremer J, Falk V, et al. 2014 ESC/EACTS guidelines on myocardial revascularization. EuroInter- vention 2015; 10: 1024-94.
  4. Witzenbichler B, Maehara A, Weisz G, Neumann FJ, Rinaldi MJ, Metzger DC, et al. Relationship between intravascular ultrasound guidance and clinical outcomes after drug-eluting stents: the as- sessment of dual antiplatelet therapy with drug-eluting stents (ADAPT-DES) study. Circulation 2014; 129: 463-70.
  5. Claessen BE, Mehran R, Mintz GS, Weisz G, Leon MB, Doğan O, et al. Impact of intravascular ultrasound imaging on early and late clinical outcomes following percutaneous coronary inter- vention with drug-eluting stents. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2011; 4: 974-81.
  6. Ahn JM, Kang SJ, Yoon SH, Park HW, Kang SM, Lee JY, et al. Meta- analysis of outcomes after intravascular ultrasound-guided ver- sus angiography-guided drug-eluting stent implantation in 26,503 patients enrolled in three randomized trials and 14 observational studies. Am J Cardiol 2014; 113: 1338-47.
  7. Jang JS, Song YJ, Kang W, Jin HY, Seo JS, Yang TH, et al. Intra- vascular ultrasound-guided implantation of drug-eluting stents to improve outcome: a meta-analysis. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2014; 7: 233-43.
  8. Klersy C, Ferlini M, Raisaro A, Scotti V, Balduini A, Curti M, et al. Use of IVUS guided coronary stenting with drug eluting stent. Int J Cardiol 2013; 170: 54-63.
  9. Park KW, Kang SH, Yang HM, Lee HY, Kang HJ, Cho YS, et al. Im- pact of intravascular ultrasound guidance in routine percutaneous coronary intervention for conventional lesions: data from the EX- CELLENT trial. Int J Cardiol 2013; 167: 721-6.
  10. Singh V, Badheka AO, Arora S, Panaich SS, Patel NJ, Patel N, et al. Comparison of inhospital mortality, length of hospitalization, costs, and vascular complications of percutaneous coronary interven- tions guided by ultrasound versus angiography. Am J Cardiol 2015; 115: 1357-66.
  11. Kim JS, Kang TS, Mintz GS, Park BE, Shin DH, Kim BK,