Dergiler / Tekirdağ Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 3

Long-term water productivity of maize (Zea mays L.) from limited Irrigation conditions under moderate semi-arid environment

Long-term Water Productivity of Maize (Zea mays L.) From Limited Irrigation Conditions under Moderate Semi-arid Environment

Sayfa
400–410
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

It is suggested that limited irrigation could be applied to enhance water productivity in maize production under such moderate semi-arid environment.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Crop production has a correlation with the applied water in moderate semi-arid conditions.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:In this study, maize (Zea mays L.) yields measured in fields during 11 years from 2005-2006 to 2015-2016 were compared with those simulated by the Agro-ecological Zone method under moderate semi-arid environment located at the north west of Iran with a soil texture of loamy-clay.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:It is suggested that limited irrigation could be applied to enhance water productivity in maize production under such moderate semi-arid environment.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2005-2006 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Deficit irrigation · Maize irrigation · Water productivity

Özet

Crop production has a correlation with the applied water in moderate semi-arid conditions. Due to temperature and rainfall changes enhancing water productivity in crop production are needed for a limited resource conditions. In this study, maize (Zea mays L.) yields measured in fields during 11 years from 2005-2006 to 2015-2016 were compared with those simulated by the Agro-ecological Zone method under moderate semi-arid environment located at the north west of Iran with a soil texture of loamy-clay. Different research scenarios involving actual evapotranspirationc (ETa) to potential (ETm) value (ETa/ETm= 100%, 90%, 80%, 70%, 60%, 50% and 40%) under different water application efficiencies (Ea) of 40%, 50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, 90% and 100% were considered in the present study. Research scenarios affected yield and water productivity of maize. To produce potential yield of maize of 10084 kg ha-1 under water application efficiency of 100, 90, 80, 70, 60, 50 and 40%, irrigation water requirements were respectively 4683, 5203, 5854, 6690, 7805, 9366, 11708 m3 ha-1 and water productivity were respectively 2.15, 1.94, 1.72, 1.51, 1.29, 1.08, 0.86 kg m-3. Results confirmed that water productivity of maize was from 1.22 to 1.52 kg m-3 with an average of 1.38 kg m-3 during 11 years under water application efficiency of 68%. Because measured yield ranged from 3800 to 6971 kg ha-1 with an average of 5345 kg ha-1 and water applied was from 3125 to 4584 and averaged 3836 m3 ha-1. It is suggested that limited irrigation could be applied to enhance water productivity in maize production under such moderate semi-arid environment.

Abstract

Crop production has a correlation with the applied water in moderate semi-arid conditions. Due to temperature and rainfall changes enhancing water productivity in crop production are needed for a limited resource conditions. In this study, maize (Zea mays L.) yields measured in fields during 11 years from 2005-2006 to 2015-2016 were compared with those simulated by the Agro-ecological Zone method under moderate semi-arid environment located at the north west of Iran with a soil texture of loamy-clay. Different research scenarios involving actual evapotranspirationc (ETa) to potential (ETm) value (ETa/ETm= 100%, 90%, 80%, 70%, 60%, 50% and 40%) under different water application efficiencies (Ea) of 40%, 50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, 90% and 100% were considered in the present study. Research scenarios affected yield and water productivity of maize. To produce potential yield of maize of 10084 kg ha-1 under water application efficiency of 100, 90, 80, 70, 60, 50 and 40%, irrigation water requirements were respectively 4683, 5203, 5854, 6690, 7805, 9366, 11708 m3 ha-1 and water productivity were respectively 2.15, 1.94, 1.72, 1.51, 1.29, 1.08, 0.86 kg m-3. Results confirmed that water productivity of maize was from 1.22 to 1.52 kg m-3 with an average of 1.38 kg m-3 during 11 years under water application efficiency of 68%. Because measured yield ranged from 3800 to 6971 kg ha-1 with an average of 5345 kg ha-1 and water applied was from 3125 to 4584 and averaged 3836 m3 ha-1. It is suggested that limited irrigation could be applied to enhance water productivity in maize production under such moderate semi-arid environment.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

NASSERİ, A. (2021). Long-term water productivity of maize (Zea mays L.) from limited Irrigation conditions under moderate semi-arid environment. Tekirdağ Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 3, 400–410. https://ajindex.com/articles/366404

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (11)

  1. Abadi, A. G. F., Nasseri, A., and Nosrati, A. E. (2010). Water use efficiency and yield of garlic responses to the irrigation system, intra-row spacing and nitrogen fertilization. Journal of Food, Agriculture and Environment, 8(2), 344-346.
  2. Abbasi, F., F. Sohrab and N. Abbasi, (2016). Evaluating on irrigation efficiencies and temporal and spatial variations in Iran. Technical Report No. 48496, Agricultural Engineering Research Institute. Al-Kaisi, M. M., and Yin, X. (2003). Effects of nitrogen rate, irrigation rate, and plant population on corn yield and water use efficiency. Agronomy journal, 95(6), 1475-1482.
  3. Bramley, H., Turner, N. C., and Siddique, K. H. (2013). Water use efficiency. In Genomics and breeding for climate-resilient crops (pp. 225-268).
  4. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. Darusman A.H., Khan L.R., Stone W.E., Spurgeon, Lamm F.R. (1997). Water flux below the root zone vs. irrigation amount in drip-irrigated corn. Agron. J. 89, 375-379.
  5. Davis, J. R. and M. A. Hagood. (1961). Efficient distribution of water in irrigating annual crops with limited supplies in drought years. California Agriculture. 15, 6-8.
  6. Denmead O.T., Shaw R.H. (1960). The effects of soil moisture stress at different stages of growth on the development and yield of corn. Agron J. 52,272-274.
  7. Doorenbos, J., and Kassam, A. H. (1979). Yield response to water. Irrigation and drainage paper, 33, 257. Du, T., Kang, S., Sun, J., Zhang, X., and Zhang, J. (2010). An improved water use efficiency of cereals under temporal and spatial deficit irrigation in north China. Agricultural Water Management, 97(1), 66-74. Eck H.V. Irrigated corn yield response to nitrogen and water. Agron. J. 1984; 76:421-428.
  8. El-Hendawy, S. E., El-Lattief, E. A. A., Ahmed, M. S., and Schmidhalter, U. (2008). Irrigation rate and plant density effects on yield and water use efficiency of drip-irrigated corn. Agricultural Water Management, 95(7), 836-844.
  9. El-Wahed, M. A., and Ali, E. A. (2013). Effect of irrigation systems, amounts of irrigation water and mulching on corn yield, water use efficiency and net profit. Agricultural Water Management, 120, 64-71.
  10. Ezenne, G. I., Jupp, L., Mantel, S. K., and Tanner, J. L. (2019). Current and potential capabilities of UAS for crop water productivity in precision agriculture. Agricultural Water Management, 218, 158-164. FAO. 2011. FAOSTAT online database, available at link http://faostat.fao.org/.accessed on December 2011.
  11. Fang, Q., Ma, L., Yu, Q., Ahuja, L. R., Malone, R. W.,