KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Tekirdağ Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 2

Yield and Quality of Two Soybean Cultivars in Response to Drought and N Fertilization

Oqba BASAL
Andr s SZAB
Sayfa
203–210
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

It was concluded that high rate of N-fertilizer can decrease the yield of both cultivars under no-drought conditions.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Applying mineral fertilizers is one way of re-fertilizing soils being exploited in agricultural production.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Drought stress has negative effects on both the quantity (yield) and the quality (seed content) of crops, especially drought-sensitive crops such as soybean; however, fertilization, if adequately applied, can partially ameliorate those negative effects.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:It was concluded that high rate of N-fertilizer can decrease the yield of both cultivars under no-drought conditions.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2017 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:irrigation · nitrogen · oil

Özet

Applying mineral fertilizers is one way of re-fertilizing soils being exploited in agricultural production. However, fertilization quantity should be controlled and pre-evaluated, as excessive amounts have negative influence on both the plants and the soil. Drought stress has negative effects on both the quantity (yield) and the quality (seed content) of crops, especially drought-sensitive crops such as soybean; however, fertilization, if adequately applied, can partially ameliorate those negative effects. An experiment was conducted in Debrecen, Hungary in 2017 and 2018 to study the effects of nitrogen fertilization application under drought stress on the yield and the seed protein and oil concentrations of two soybean cultivars. Three N fertilization rates; 0, 35 and 105 kg ha-1 were applied under two irrigation regimes; Irrigated (control) and drought stressed (non-irrigated) regimes. Results showed that yield trait responded differently to fertilization and irrigation in the two cultivars. Protein concentration was enhanced by irrigation and by the high rate of N-fertilizer, whereas oil concentration decreased by irrigation and by high-rate fertilization under drought conditions, whereas increased by high-rate fertilization under irrigated regime. It was concluded that high rate of N-fertilizer can decrease the yield of both cultivars under no-drought conditions.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

BASAL, O., SZAB, A. S. (2020). Yield and Quality of Two Soybean Cultivars in Response to Drought and N Fertilization. Tekirdağ Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 2, 203–210. https://ajindex.com/articles/366396

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. Bellaloui, N., Mengistu, A. (2008). Seed composition is influenced by irrigation regimes and cultivar differences in soybean. Irrigation Science, 26(3), 261–268.
  2. Bloom, A. J. (2006). Rising carbon dioxide concentrations and the future of crop production. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 86, 1289-1291.
  3. Boydak, E., Alpaslan, M., Hayta, M., Gerçek, S., Simsek, M. (2002). Seed composition of soybeans grown in the Harran Region of Turkey as affected by row spacing and irrigation. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 50(16), 4718–4720.
  4. Brevedan, R. E., Egli, D. B., Leggett, J. E. (1978). Influence of N nutrition on flower and pod abortion and yield of soybeans. Agronomy Journal, 70, 81–84.
  5. Carrera, C., Martinez, M. J., Dardanelli J., Balzarini, M. (2009). Water deficit effect on the relationship between temperature during the seed fill period and soybean seed oil and protein concentrations. Crop Science, 49, 990–998.
  6. Chung, J., Babka, H. L., Graef, G. L., Staswick, P. E., Lee, D. J., Cregan, P. B., Shoemaker, R. C., Specht, J. E. (2003). The seed protein, oil, and yield QTL on soybean linkage group I. Crop Science, 43(3), 1053–1067.
  7. Fageria, N., Baligar, V. (2005). Enhancing nitrogen use efficiency in crop plants. Advances in Agronomy, 88, 97–185.
  8. Fan, X. D., Wang, J. Q., Yang, N., Dong, Y. Y., Liu, L., Wang, F. W., Li, H. Y. (2013). Gene expression profiling of soybean leaves and roots under salt, saline-alkali and drought stress by high throughput Illumina sequencing. Gene, 512(2), 392–402.
  9. Garcia y Garcia, A., Persson, T., Guerra, L. C., Hoogenboom, G. (2010). Response of soybean genotypes to different irrigation regimes in a humid region of the southeastern USA. Agricultural Water Management, 97(7), 981–987.
  10. Gault, R. R., Chase, D. L., Banks, L. W., Brockwell, J. (1984). Remedial measures to salvage unnodulated soybean crops. Journal of the Australian Institute of Agricultural Science, 50, 244–246.
  11. He, J., Du, Y. L., Wang, T., Turner, N. C., Yang, R. P., Jin, Y., Li, F. M. (2017). Conserved water use improves the yield performance of soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) under drought. Agricultural Water Management, 179, 236–245.
  12. Hungria, M., Franchini, J. C., Campo, R. J., Crispino, C. C., Moraes, J. Z., Sibaldelli, R. N. R., Mendes, I. C., Arihara, L. (2006). Nitrogen nutrition of soybean in Brazil: contributions of biological N2 fixation and N fertilizer to grain yield. Canadian Journal of Plant Sciences, 86, 927–939.
  13. Kaschuk, G., Nogueir