Dergiler / The Anatolian Journal of Cardiology / 2015 / Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 3

Do we need a femoral artery route for transvenous PDA closure in children with ADO-I?

Sayfa
242–247
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

But for the reliability and validity of this method, randomized multicenter clinical studies are necessary.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: The standard procedure in percutaneous closure of patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) with Amplatzer duct occluder-I (ADO-I) is trans- venous closure guided by aortic access through femoral artery.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Methods: This study was designed retrospectively and 101 pediatric patients were included.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:But for the reliability and validity of this method, randomized multicenter clinical studies are necessary.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2004 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Objective: The standard procedure in percutaneous closure of patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) with Amplatzer duct occluder-I (ADO-I) is trans- venous closure guided by aortic access through femoral artery. The current study aims to compare the procedures for PDA closure with ADO- I: only transvenous access with the standard procedure. Methods: This study was designed retrospectively and 101 pediatric patients were included. PDA closure was done by only femoral venous access in 19 of them (group 1), arterial and venous access used in 92 patients (group 2) between 2004 to 2012 years. The position of the device and residual shunt in group1 was evaluated by the guidance of the aortogram obtained during the return phase of the pulmonary artery injection and guidance of transthoracic echocardiography. Shapiro-Wilk's test, Mann-Whitney U, chi-squared tests were used for statistical comparison. Results: The procedure was successful in 18 (95%) patients in group 1 and 90 (98%) patients in group 2. Complications including the pulmonary artery embolization (n=1), protrusion to pulmonary artery (n=1), inguinal hematoma (n=3), bleeding (n=2) were only detected in group 2. In other words, while complications were observed in 7 (7.2%) patients in group 2, no minor/major complication was observed in group 1. Complete closure in group 1 was: in catheterization room 14 (77.8%), at 24 th hour in 2 (11.1%), at first month in 2 (11.1%). Complete closure in group 2 was: 66 (73.4%) patients in the catheterization room, 21 (23.3%) at 24th hour, 3 (3.3%) at first month, complete closure occurred at the end of first month. Conclusion: In percutaneouse PDA closure via ADO-I, this technique can be a choice for patients whose femoral artery could not be accessed, or access is impossible/contraindicated. But for the reliability and validity of this method, randomized multicenter clinical studies are necessary.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

BAYKAN, A., NARİN, N., ÖZYURT, A., ARGUN, M., PAMUKÇU, Ö., ONAN, S. H., SEZER, S., BAYKAN, Z., ÜZÜM, K. (2015). Do we need a femoral artery route for transvenous PDA closure in children with ADO-I?. The Anatolian Journal of Cardiology, Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 3, 242–247. https://ajindex.com/articles/365933

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (3)

  1. Porstmann W, Wierny L, Warnke H. Closure of persistent ductus arteriosus without thoracotomy. Ger Med Mon 1967; 12: 259-61
  2. Faella HJ, Hijazi ZM. Closure of the patent ductus arteriosus with the amplatzer PDA device: immediate results of the international clinical trial. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2000; 51: 50-4. [CrossRef] 3. Ghasemi A, Pandya S, Reddy SV, Turner DR, Du W, Navabi MA, et al. Trans-catheter closure of patent ductus arteriosus-What is the best device? Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2010; 76: 687-95. [CrossRef] 4. Ammar RI, Hegazy RA. Percutaneous closure of medium and large PDAs using amplatzer duct occluder (ADO) I and II in infants: safety and efficacy. J Invasive Cardiol 2012; 24: 579-82
  3. Paç FA, Polat TB, Oflaz MB, Ballı Ş. Closure of patent ductus arte- riosus with duct occluder device in adult patients: evaluation of the approaches to facilitate the procedure. Anatol J Cardiol 2011; 11: 64-70. [CrossRef] 6. Chen Z, Chen L, Wu L. Transcatheter amplatzer occlusion and surgical closure of patent ductus arteriosus: comparison of effec- tiveness and costs in a low-income country. Pediatr Cardiol 2009; 30: 781-5. [CrossRef] 7. Kirchenko A, Benson LN, Burrows P, Möes CA, McLaughlin PA, Freedom RM. Angiographic classification of the isolated, persis- tently patent ductus arteriosus and implications for percutaneous catheter occlusion. Am J Cardiol 1989; 63: 877-80. [CrossRef] 8. Agnoletti G, Marini D, Villar AM, Bordese R, Gabbarini F. Closure of the patent ductus arteriosus with the new duct occluder II additional sizes device. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2012; 79: 1169-74. [CrossRef] 9. Forsey J, Kenny D, Morgan G, Hayes A, Turner M, Tometzki A, et al. Early clinical experience with the new Amplatzer Ductal Occluder II for closure of the persistent arterial duct. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2009; 74: 615-23. [CrossRef] 10. Pass RH, Hijazi Z, Hsu DT, Lewis V, Hellenbrand WE. Multicenter USA Amplatzer patent ductus arteriosus occlusion device trial: initial and one-year results. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004; 44: 513-9. [CrossRef] 11. Hildebrandt N, Schneider C, Schweigl T, Schneider M. Long-term follow-up after transvenous single coil embolization of patent duc- tus arteriosus in dogs. J Vet Intern Med 2010; 24: 1400-6. [CrossRef] 12. Henrich E, Hildebrandt N, Schneider C, Hassdenteufel E, Schneider M. Tansvenous coil embolization of patent ductus arteriosus in small (_____3.0 kg) dogs. J Vet Intern Med 2011; 25: 65-70. [CrossRef] 13. Grabitz RG,