Dergiler / The Anatolian Journal of Cardiology / 2018 / Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 6

Major adverse cardiac events and drug-coated balloon size in coronary interventions

Sayfa
382–387
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Likewise, at 2-year follow-up, MACE did not differ between the groups (23.2% vs. 27.5%, RR 1.2, 95% CI0.6-1.5, p=0.408).Conclusion: DCB length was not associated with clinical outcome during a 2-year follow-up period.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: In-stent restenosis (ISR) is a feared complication after coronary stent implantation.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Hypothesis: DCB length is associated withclinical outcome.Methods: We analyzed 286 consecutive Pantera Lux (Biotronik, active component Paclitaxel) DCB-treated patients between April 2009 and June2012.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Likewise, at 2-year follow-up, MACE did not differ between the groups (23.2% vs. 27.5%, RR 1.2, 95% CI0.6-1.5, p=0.408).Conclusion: DCB length was not associated with clinical outcome during a 2-year follow-up period.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2009 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Objective: In-stent restenosis (ISR) is a feared complication after coronary stent implantation. Drug-coated balloon (DCB) is being promoted asa treatment option for ISR. However, the benefit-risk ratio of DCB length has not been investigated. Longer DCBs release more anti-proliferativedrug to the vessel wall; however, they are associated with a higher lesion length and vessel injury. Hypothesis: DCB length is associated withclinical outcome.Methods: We analyzed 286 consecutive Pantera Lux (Biotronik, active component Paclitaxel) DCB-treated patients between April 2009 and June2012. Of them, 176 patients were treated using a 15-mm DCB and 109 were treated using a 20-mm DCB. Baseline characteristics and major adversecardiac events (MACE; death, myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization) during initial hospital stay and a 2-year follow-upperiod were obtained.Results: Patients characteristics such as cardiovascular risk factors, prior diseases, co-medication, clinical presentation, target vessel, andleft ventricular function did not differ between the groups. MACE during hospital course was similar [1.7% vs. 2.8%, relative risk (RR) 1.6, 95%confidence interval (CI) 0.3-7.9, p=0.554]. Likewise, at 2-year follow-up, MACE did not differ between the groups (23.2% vs. 27.5%, RR 1.2, 95% CI0.6-1.5, p=0.408).Conclusion: DCB length was not associated with clinical outcome during a 2-year follow-up period.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

NAGUİB, D., KNOOP, B., DANNENBERG, L., LİEBSCH, E., PÖHL, M., HELTEN, C., ASSADİ-SCHMİDT, A., KELM, M., ZEUS, T., POLZİN, A. (2018). Major adverse cardiac events and drug-coated balloon size in coronary interventions. The Anatolian Journal of Cardiology, Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 6, 382–387. https://ajindex.com/articles/365787

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (5)

  1. Brunetti ND, Delli Carri F, Ruggiero MA, Cuculo A, Ruggiero A, Ziccardi L, et al. Comparative cath-lab assessment of coronary stenosis by radiology technician, junior and senior interventional cardiologist in patients treated with coronary angioplasty. Interv Med Appl Sci 2014; 6: 26-30. [CrossRef] Grundeken MJ, Ishibashi Y, Généreux P, LaSalle L, Iqbal J, Wykrzykowska JJ, et al. Inter-core lab variability in analyzing quantitative coronary angiography for bifurcation lesions: a post-hoc analysis of a randomized trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2015; 8: 305-14.
  2. Assadi-Schmidt A, Mohring A, Liebsch E, Dannenberg L, Achilles A, Pöhl M, et al. SeQuent Please vs. Pantera Lux drug coated balloon angioplasty in real life: Results from the Düsseldorf DCB registry. Int J Cardiol 2017; 231: 68-72. [CrossRef] Holmes DR Jr, Kereiakes DJ, Garg S, Serruys PW, Dehmer GJ, Ellis SG, et al. Stent thrombosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010; 56: 1357-65. Altman DG. Practical statistics for medical research. Chapman and Hall, London; 1991.
  3. Loh JP, Waksman R. Paclitaxel drug-coated balloons: a review of current status and emerging applications in native coronary artery de novo lesions. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2012; 5: 1001-12. Authors/Task Force members, Windecker S, Kolh P, Alfonso F, Collet JP, Cremer J, et al. 2014 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization: The Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS)Developed with the special contribution of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI). Eur Heart J 2014; 35: 2541-619.
  4. Wöhrle J, Zadura M, Möbius-Winkler S, Leschke M, Opitz C, Ahmed W, et al. SeQuentPlease World Wide Registry: clinical results of SeQuent please paclitaxel-coated balloon angioplasty in a large-scale, prospective registry study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012; 60: 1733-8.
  5. Habara S, Kadota K, Shimada T, Ohya M, Amano H, Izawa Y, et al. Late Restenosis After Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon Angioplasty Occurs in Patients With Drug-Eluting Stent Restenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2015; 66: 14-22. [CrossRef] Siontis GC, Stefanini GG, Mavridis D, Siontis KC, Alfonso F, PérezVizcayno MJ, et al. Percutaneous coronary interventional strategies for treatment of in-stent restenosis: a network meta-analysis. Lancet 2015; 386: 655-64. [CrossRef] Taniwaki M, Stefanini GG, Silber S, Richardt G, Vranckx P, Serruys PW, et al.; RESOLUTE All-Comers Investig