Dergiler / The Anatolian Journal of Cardiology / 2015 / Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 3

Predicting the outcome in patients with unexplained syncope and suspected cardiac cause: Role of electrophysiologic studies

Sayfa
213–217
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The patients with SHD and unexplained syncope who had a negative EP study have a good long-term prognosis even in the presence of LV dysfunction.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: Unexplained syncope is a challenge facing electrophysiologists.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Methods: A total of 227 consecutive patients with unexplained syncope were prospectively enrolled in this study.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The patients with SHD and unexplained syncope who had a negative EP study have a good long-term prognosis even in the presence of LV dysfunction.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Objective: Unexplained syncope is a challenge facing electrophysiologists. The prognosis varies widely depending on underlying causes, spe- cially, cardiac ones. We sought to determine the abnormal electrophysiolgic (EP) study results as predictors of prognosis in syncope patients with suspected cardiac cause and risk factors associated with mortality. Methods: A total of 227 consecutive patients with unexplained syncope were prospectively enrolled in this study. EP study was performed in 177 patients in base of inclusion criteria. These patients, in whom a cardiac cause of syncope was suspected, underwent EP study and if negative, head-up tilts test (HUTT). Complete follow-up was obtained for 132 patients for 20.0±10.8 months. Results: A cardiac cause of syncope was established in 35%, a neurally mediated syncope in 35.6%, and in the rest 29.4% the cause of syn- cope remained unexplained despite a throughout neurologic and cardiologic evaluation. Logistic analysis revealed that the significant predic- tors of a cardiac cause of syncope were the absence of prodromal symptoms, left bundle branch block (LBBB), sever left ventricle (LV) dysfunc- tion and male gender. At logistic analysis, the presence of LBBB (OR=6.63; 95% CI: 1.09-40) was significantly associated with outcome of death. Conclusion: The present study provides evidence that presence of LBBB, abnormal EP study result and structural heart disease (SHD) have prognostic value in patients with suspected cardiac cause of syncope. The patients with SHD and unexplained syncope who had a negative EP study have a good long-term prognosis even in the presence of LV dysfunction.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

RAD, M. A., FARAHANİ, M., EMKANJOO, Z., MOLADOUST, H., ALİZADEH, A. (2015). Predicting the outcome in patients with unexplained syncope and suspected cardiac cause: Role of electrophysiologic studies. The Anatolian Journal of Cardiology, Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 3, 213–217. https://ajindex.com/articles/365592

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (3)

  1. Wieling W, Ganzeboom KS, Krediet CT, Grundmeijer HG, Wilde AA, van Dijk JG. Initial diagnostic strategy in the case of transient losses of consciousness: the importance of the medical history. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2003; 147: 849-54
  2. Suzuki T, Matsunaga N, Kohsaka S. Diagnostic patterns in the evaluation of patients hospitalized with syncope. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2006; 29: 1240-4. [CrossRef] 3. Kenny RA, Bhangu J, King-Kallimanis BL. Epidemiology of synco- pe/collapse in younger and older Western patient populations. Prog in Cardiovasc Dis 2013; 55: 357-63. [CrossRef] 4. Deharo JC, Guieu R, Mechulan A, Peyrouse E, Kipson N, Ruf J, et al. Syncope without prodromes in patients with normal heart and normal electrocardiogram:a distinct entity. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013; 62: 1075-80. [CrossRef] 5. Ammirati F, Colivicchi F, Santini M. Diagnosing syncope in clinical practice. Implementation of a simplified diagnostic algorithm in a Multicenter prospective trial- the OESI 2 study. Eur Heart J 2000; 21: 935-40. [CrossRef] 6. Alboni P, Brignole M, Menozzi C, Raviele A, Del Rosso A, Dinelli M, et al. Diagnostic value of history in patients with syncope with or without heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001; 37: 1921-8. [CrossRef] 7. Kapoor WN. Evaluation and management of patients with syncope. JAMA 1992; 268: 2553-60. [CrossRef] 8. Gibson CM, Ciaglo LN, Southard MC, Takao S, Harrigan C, Lewis J, et al. Diagnostic and prognostic value of ambulatory ECG (Holter) monitoring in patients with coronary heart disease: a review. J Thromb Thrombolysis 2007; 23: 135-45. [CrossRef] 9. Brignole M, Deharo JC, De Roy L, Menozzi C, Blommaert D, Dabiri L, et al. Syncope due to idiopathic paroxysmal atrioventricular block. Long term follow up of a distinct form of atrioventricular block. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011; 58: 167-73. [CrossRef] 10. Moya A, Sutton R, Ammirati F, Blanc JJ, Brignole M, Dahm JB, et al. Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of syncope. The task force for the diagnosis and management of syncope of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 2009; 30: 2631- 71. [CrossRef] 11. Azocar D, Ruiz-Granell R, Ferrero A, Martinez-Brotons A, Izquierdo M, Dominguez E, et al. Syncope and bundle branch block. Diagnostic yield of a stepped use of electrophysiology study and implantable loop recorders. Rev Esp Cardiol 2011; 64: 213-9. [CrossRef] 12. Gauer RL. Evaluation of syncope. Am Fam Physician 2011; 84: 640- 50
  3. Parry SW, Tan MP. An approach to the