Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar
AI InsightConclusion: In patients undergoing CRT, BV pacing has no deteriorating effect on ventricular repolarization, but LV pacing has a prolonging effect on Tp-e. (Anatol J Cardiol 2015; 15: 188-95)
📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale
Abstract
Objective: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) was thought to have a proarrhythmic effect on ventricular repolarization. But the results of previous studies were inconsistent. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of CRT on ventricular repolarization. Methods: A meta-analysis of studies focused on the effect of CRT on ventricular repolarization in patients undergoing CRT was conducted. Endpoints including QT interval (QT), JT interval (JT), QT dispersion(QTD) and interval between the peak to end of T wave (Tp-e). Results: A total of 14 studies were included in our meta-analysis. After pooling the data, no significant difference was observed in QT, JT and Tp-e between biventricular (BV) pacing and intrinsic ventricular rhythm. BV paced QTD was lower than intrinsic QTD, but the significance was ambigu- ous [mean difference (MD): -17.33, 95% CI -34.44 to -0.22, p=0.05]. Left ventricular (LV) paced Tp-e was significantly longer than intrinsic Tp-e (MD: 21.44, 95% CI 2.37 to 40.51, p=0.03). No significant difference was observed in QT, JT and QTD between LV pacing and intrinsic ventricular rhythm. Conclusion: In patients undergoing CRT, BV pacing has no deteriorating effect on ventricular repolarization, but LV pacing has a prolonging effect on Tp-e. (Anatol J Cardiol 2015; 15: 188-95)