Dergiler / The Anatolian Journal of Cardiology / 2015 / Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 7

Coronary slow flow: Benign or ominous?

Sayfa
531–535
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Primary and secondary cardiovasculature preventive mea- sures should be constituted and seem worthwhile in this patient population.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: Coronary slow flow phenomenon has been arbitrarily defined as delayed coronary blood flow in the absence of obstructive coronary artery disease.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Methods: In this prospective cross-sectional study, 217 consecutive patients who had undergone coronary angiography and showed features of coronary slow flow phenomenon were evaluated for demographic and coronary risk factor profile, as well as clinical outcomes, at baseline and following treatment.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Primary and secondary cardiovasculature preventive mea- sures should be constituted and seem worthwhile in this patient population.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Objective: Coronary slow flow phenomenon has been arbitrarily defined as delayed coronary blood flow in the absence of obstructive coronary artery disease. The present study sought to investigate the clinical features, natural history, and outcomes of affected patients. Methods: In this prospective cross-sectional study, 217 consecutive patients who had undergone coronary angiography and showed features of coronary slow flow phenomenon were evaluated for demographic and coronary risk factor profile, as well as clinical outcomes, at baseline and following treatment. Results: The study population consisted of 165 (76%) males and 52 (24%) females. The mean age of patients was 52.6±10 years. Mean ejection fraction was 48.2±5.4, 39.3% had diabetes, 43.3% had hypertension, 49.8% was a cigarette smoker, 41.9% had dyslipidemia, and 15% had a familial history of cardiac disease. Forty-nine percent was detected to have abnormal hsCRP levels. The most prevalent presenting complaint was atypical chest pain. Fifty-four percent of patients had slow blood flow in all three vessels. Thirty-six people had undergone repeat coronary angiography in a follow-up period of 5-7 years due to persisting or worsening clinical symptoms, of whom 6 (16.6%) showed significant coronary artery stenosis. Eight (22.2%) had mild CAD, and the rest still showed coronary slow flow without significant stenosis. The most common com- plaint during follow-up and after initiation of medical therapy was nonanginal chest pain. Conclusion: Patients with coronary slow flow phenomenon are predisposed to atherosclerosis and obstructive coronary artery disease. Therefore, this pathology should not be considered as a totally benign condition. Primary and secondary cardiovasculature preventive mea- sures should be constituted and seem worthwhile in this patient population.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

AMELI, M. A. S., SAEDI, S., SAEDI, T., MADANI, M., ESMAEILI, M., GHARDOOST, B. (2015). Coronary slow flow: Benign or ominous?. The Anatolian Journal of Cardiology, Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 7, 531–535. https://ajindex.com/articles/365571

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (15)

  1. Li JJ, Wu YJ, Qin XW. Should slow coronary flow be considered as a coronary syndrome? Med Hypotheses 2006
  2. [CrossRef] 2. Erdoğan D, Çalışkan M, Güllü H, Sezgin AT, Yıldırır A, Müderrisoğlu H. Coronary flow reserve is impaired in patients with slow coronary flow. Atherosclerosis 2007
  3. [CrossRef] 3. Tambe AA, Demany MA, Zimmerman HA, Mascarenhas E. Angina pectoris and slow flow velocity of dye in coronary arteries: A new angiographic finding. Am Heart J 1972
  4. [CrossRef] 4. Mangieri E, Macchiarelli G, Ciavolella M, Barillá F, Avella A, Martinotti A, et al. Slow coronary flow: clinical and histopathologi- cal features in patients with otherwise normal epicardial coronary arteries. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1996
  5. [CrossRef] 5. Tatlı E, Yıldırım T, Aktöz M. Does coronary slow flow phenomenon lead to myocardial ischemia? Int J Cardiol 2009
  6. [CrossRef] 6. Herrmann J, Kaski JC, Lerman A. Coronary microvascular dysfunc- tion in the clinical setting: from mystery to reality. Eur Heart J 2012
  7. [CrossRef] 7. Goel PK‚ Gupta SK‚ Agarwal A‚ Kapoor A. Slow coronary flow: a distinct angiographic subgroup in syndrome X. Angiology 2001
  8. [CrossRef] 8. Li JJ, Xu B, Li ZC, Qian J, Wei BQ. Is slow coronary flow associated with inflammation? Med Hypotheses 2006
  9. [CrossRef] 9. Fineschi M, Bravi A, Gori T. The “slow coronary flow” phenomenon: evidence of preserved coronary flow reserve despite increased resting microvascular resistances. Int J Cardiol 2008
  10. [CrossRef] 10. Wang X, Geng LL, Nie SP. Coronary slow flow phenomenon: a local or systemic disease? Med Hypotheses 2010
  11. [CrossRef] 11. Hawkins BM, Stavrakis S, Rousan TA, Abu-Fadel M, Schechter E. Coronary slow flow -prevalence and clinical correlations. Circ J 2012
  12. [CrossRef] 12. Gökçe M, Kaplan S, Tekelioğlu Y, Erdoğan T, Küçükosmanoğlu M. Platelet function disorder in patients with coronary slow flow. Clin Cardiol 2005
  13. [CrossRef] 13. Beltrame JF, Limaye SB, Horowitz JD. The coronary slow flow phenomenon-a new coronary microvascular disorder. Cardiology 2002
  14. [CrossRef] 14. Pekdemir H, Polat G, Cin VG, Camsarı A, Çiçek D, Akkuş MN‚ et al. Elevated plasma endothelin-1 levels in coronary sinus during rapid right atrial pacing in patients with slow coronary flow. Int J Cardiol 2004
  15. [CrossRef] 15. Dai YX, Li CG, Huang ZY, Zhong X, Qian JY, Liu XB‚ et al. Clinical a