Dergiler / The Anatolian Journal of Cardiology / 2016 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 2

Effect of iterative reconstruction on image quality in evaluating patients with coronary calcifications or stents during coronary computed tomography angiography: a pilot study

Sayfa
119–124
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

When combined with a sharp kernel, IRIS can improve image quality by reducing the negative effects of decreased signal that may result from using a sharp kernel.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: To determine the effect of "Iterative Reconstruction in Image Space" (IRIS) on image quality by comparing reconstructions of both medium and sharp kernels when evaluating coronary calcifications or stents during coronary computed tomography (CT) angiography.Methods: Thirty one consecutive patients were scanned with an electrocardiogram-gated helical technique on a dual-source CT system.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Image reconstruction was performed using standard filtered back projection (FBP) and IRIS algorithm on both medium and sharp kernels (B26f, I26f, B46f, I46f).
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:When combined with a sharp kernel, IRIS can improve image quality by reducing the negative effects of decreased signal that may result from using a sharp kernel.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Objective: To determine the effect of "Iterative Reconstruction in Image Space" (IRIS) on image quality by comparing reconstructions of both medium and sharp kernels when evaluating coronary calcifications or stents during coronary computed tomography (CT) angiography.Methods: Thirty one consecutive patients were scanned with an electrocardiogram-gated helical technique on a dual-source CT system. Image reconstruction was performed using standard filtered back projection (FBP) and IRIS algorithm on both medium and sharp kernels (B26f, I26f, B46f, I46f). Each reconstruction was derived from the same raw data. Two blinded readers graded image quality using a five-point scale. Noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were obtained. Noise was derived from the ascending aorta and left ventricle. SNR was obtained from sinus Valsalva, interventricular septum, and coronary vessels. CNR was obtained from septum, coronary vessels, and left ventricle. Comparisons of paired results between FBP and IRIS images were analyzed using the repeated measures analysis of variance method. Interreader correlation was assessed using weighted Kappa statistic.Results: Noise values of the ascending aorta and left ventricle were significantly lower in the images reconstructed with IRIS than those reconstructed with FBP for the evaluation of the same filters. SNR and CNR values were higher in the IRIS images (p<0.05). Interreader agreement for four reconstructions was interpreted as moderate (?=0.40-0.59).Conclusion: IRIS significantly reduced image noise and improved imaging of coronary calcifications or stents. When combined with a sharp kernel, IRIS can improve image quality by reducing the negative effects of decreased signal that may result from using a sharp kernel.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

GÜLER, E., VURAL, V., ÜNAL, E., KÖSE, I. Ç., AKATA, D., KARACAALTINCABA, M., HAZIROLAN, T. (2016). Effect of iterative reconstruction on image quality in evaluating patients with coronary calcifications or stents during coronary computed tomography angiography: a pilot study. The Anatolian Journal of Cardiology, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 2, 119–124. https://ajindex.com/articles/365450

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (12)

  1. Leschka S, Alkadhi H, Plass A, Desbiolles L, Grünenfelder J, Marincek B, et al. Accuracy of MSCT coronary angiography with 64 slice technology: first experience. Eur Heart J 2005; 26: 1482-7.
  2. Mollet NR, Cademartiri F, van Mieghem CA, Runza G, McFadden EP, Baks T, et al. High- resolution spiral computed tomography coro- nary angiography in patients referred for diagnostic conventional coronary angiography. Circulation 2005; 112: 2318-23.
  3. Leber AW, Johnson T, Becker A, von Ziegler F, Tittus J, Nikolaou K, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of dual-source multi-slice CT-coronary angiography in patients with an intermediate pretest likelihood for coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J 2007; 28: 2354-60.
  4. Sabarudin A, Sun Z, Ng KH. A systematic review of radiation dose associated with different generations of multidetector CT coronary angiography. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2012; 56: 5-17.
  5. Kalender WA, Wolf H, Suess C, Gies M, Greess H, Bautz WA. Dose reduction in CT by on-line tube current control: principles and validation on phantoms and cadavers. Eur Radiol 1999; 9: 323-8.
  6. Hausleiter J, Martinoff S, Hadamitzky M, Martuscelli E, Pschierer I, Feuchtner GM, et al. Image quality and radiation exposure with a low tube voltage protocol for coronary CT angiography results of the PROTECTION II Trial. JACC Cardiovasc Imag 2010; 3: 1113-23.
  7. Stolzmann P, Leschka S, Scheffel H, Krauss T, Desbiolles L, Plass A, et al. Dual-source CT in step-and-shoot mode: noninvasive coro- nary angiography with low radiation dose. Radiology 2008; 249: 71-80.
  8. Park EA, Lee W, Kim KW, Kim KG, Thomas A, Chung JW, et al. Iterative reconstruction of dual-source coronary CT angiography: assessment of image quality and radiation dose. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2012; 28: 1775-86.
  9. Leipsic J, Heilbron BG, Hague C. Iterative reconstruction for coro- nary CT angiography: finding its way. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2012; 28: 613-20.
  10. Sheth T, Dodd JD, Hoffmann U, Abbara S, Finn A, Gold HK, et al. Coronary stent assessability by 64 slice multi-detector computed tomography. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2007; 69: 933-8.
  11. Hamon M, Biondi-Zoccai GG, Malagutti P, Agostoni P, Morello R, Valgimigli M, et al. Diagnostic performance of multislice spiral computed tomography of coronary arteries as compared with conventional invasive coronary angiography: a meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006; 48: 1896-910.
  12. Stein PD, Beemath A, Kayalı F, Skaf E, Sanchez J, Olson RE. Multidetector computed tomography for the diagnosis of corona