Dergiler / The Anatolian Journal of Cardiology / 2020 / Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 3

New perspectives by imaging modalities for an old illness: Rheumatic mitral stenosis

Sayfa
128–140
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The present review aimed to summarize the role of new multimodality, multiparametric imaging approaches to assess the morphological characteristics of the rheumatic MS and its associated complications, and to guidepatient management.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Mitral stenosis (MS) is a progressive and devastating disease and most often occurs among young women.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Novel imaging modalities significantly improved the assessment ofseveral aspects of this rheumatic destructive process including the morphological alterations of the mitral valve (MV) apparatus, left atrial (LA) function, LA appendage, right and left ventricular (LV) functions, and complications, namely, atrial fibrillation and thromboembolic events.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The present review aimed to summarize the role of new multimodality, multiparametric imaging approaches to assess the morphological characteristics of the rheumatic MS and its associated complications, and to guidepatient management.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Mitral stenosis (MS) is a progressive and devastating disease and most often occurs among young women. Given its considerable prevalence inMediterranean and Eastern European countries according to the Euro Heart Survey, new imaging modalities are warranted to improve the management of patients with this condition. A wide spectrum of abnormalities occurs involving all parts of this complex structure and causing differentgrades of MS and/or regurgitation as a consequence of rheumatic affection. Novel imaging modalities significantly improved the assessment ofseveral aspects of this rheumatic destructive process including the morphological alterations of the mitral valve (MV) apparatus, left atrial (LA) function, LA appendage, right and left ventricular (LV) functions, and complications, namely, atrial fibrillation and thromboembolic events. Furthermore,new imaging modalities improved the prediction of outcome of patients who underwent percutaneous balloon mitral comissurotomy and changedthe paradigm of patient selection for intervention and risk stratification. The present review aimed to summarize the role of new multimodality, multiparametric imaging approaches to assess the morphological characteristics of the rheumatic MS and its associated complications, and to guidepatient management.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ÖZ, T. K., TOK, Ö. Ö., SADE, L. E. (2020). New perspectives by imaging modalities for an old illness: Rheumatic mitral stenosis. The Anatolian Journal of Cardiology, Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 3, 128–140. https://ajindex.com/articles/365233

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (14)

  1. Nkomo VT, Gardin JM, Skelton TN, Gottdiener JS, Scott CG, Enriquez-Sarano M. Burden of valvular heart diseases: a populationbased study. Lancet 2006; 368: 1005-11
  2. Demirbağ R, Sade LE, Aydın M, Bozkurt A, Acartürk E. The Turkish registry of heart valve disease. Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars 2013; 41: 1-10
  3. Iung B, Baron G, Butchart EG, Delahaye F, Gohlke-Bärwolf C, Levang OW, et al. A prospective survey of patients with valvular heart disease in Europe: the Euro Heart Survey on Valvular Heart Disease. Eur Heart J 2003; 24: 1231-43
  4. Iung B, Vahanian A. Epidemiology of acquired valvular heart disease. Can J Cardiol 2014; 30: 962-70
  5. Gujral DM, Lloyd g, Bhattacharyya S. Radiation-induced valvular heart diesae. Heart 2016; 102: 269-76
  6. Krapf L, Dreyfus J, Cueff C, Lepage L, Brochet E, Vahanian A, et al. Anatomical features of rheumatic and non-rheumatic mitral stenosis: potential additional value of three-dimensional echocardiography. Arch Cardiovasc Dis 2013; 106: 111-5
  7. Hatle L, Angelsen B, Tromsdal A. Noninvasive assessment of atrioventricular pressure half-time by Doppler ultrasound. Circulation 1979; 60: 1096-104
  8. Baumgartner H, Hung J, Bermejo J, Chambers JB, Evangelista A, Griffin BP, et al. Echocardiographic assessment of valve stenosis: EAE/ASE recommendations for clinical practice. Eur J Echocardiogr 2009; 10: 1-25
  9. Rodriguez L, Thomas JD, Monterroso V, Weyman AE, Harrigan P, Mueller LN, et al. Validation of the proximal flow convergence method. Calculation of orifice area in patients with mitral stenosis. Circulation 1993; 88: 1157-65
  10. Schlosshan D, Aggarwal G, Mathur G, Allan R, Cranney G. Real-time 3D transesophageal echocardiography for the evaluation of rheumatic mitral stenosis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2011; 4: 580-8
  11. Zamorano J, Cordeiro P, Sugeng L, Perez de Isla L, Weinert L, Macaya C, et al. Real-time three-dimensional echocardiography for rheumatic mitral valve stenosis evaluation: an accurate and novel approach. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004; 43: 2091-6
  12. Min SY, Song JM, Kim YJ, Park HK, Seo MO, Lee MS, et al. Discrepancy between mitral valve areas measured by two-dimensional planimetry and three-dimensional transoesophageal echocardiography in patients with mitral stenosis. Heart 2013; 99: 253-8
  13. Binder TM, Rosenhek R, Porenta G, Maurer G, Baumgartner H. Improved assessment of mitral valve stenosis by volumetric real-time three-dimensional echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000; 36: 1355–61
  14. Chu JW, Lev