Dergiler / Şişli Etfal Hastanesi Tıp Bülteni / 2018 / Cilt: 52 - Sayı: 3

Role of Laparoscopic Appendectomy Radix Ligation Techniques on the Formation of Inner Abdomen Abscess

Sayfa
164–168
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

We believe that this 2 mm dead space distance left between the two endoloops contributes to the formation of the abscess.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objectives: Our aim was to study whether laparoscopic appendectomy radix ligation techniques were eutrophic in the development of intra-abdominal abscess.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Methods: Between September 2009 and April 2017, all emergency cases admitted to our surgery polyclinic were reviewed, and the results of the patients who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy were collected.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:We believe that this 2 mm dead space distance left between the two endoloops contributes to the formation of the abscess.
🔬Tür:Literatür & Derleme Çalışması
📍Kapsam:2009 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Objectives: Our aim was to study whether laparoscopic appendectomy radix ligation techniques were eutrophic in the development of intra-abdominal abscess. Methods: Between September 2009 and April 2017, all emergency cases admitted to our surgery polyclinic were reviewed, and the results of the patients who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy were collected. Appendectomy radix ligation techniques were reviewed from surgical notes on discharge reports. Postoperative controls were also reviewed, and any cases with abscess formation were reported. Results: A total of 350 patients were included in the study. Of these cases, 207 were males, and 143 were females. The mean age of the patients was 26.89±4.9 years. One hundred eighty-nine cases were found to have two endoloops placed on top of each other, whereas 161 cases had a 2 mm distance left in between the two endoloops and tied. None of the 189 cases who had endoloops placed on top of each other developed abscess formation. However, of the 161 cases who had endoloops with a 2 mm distance in between, 8 reported with abscess formation in the inner abdomen. Of these eight cases, seven had percutaneous abscess drainage by an interventional radiologist, whereas one was treated with relaparoscopy. Conclusion: In the present study, patients who had endoloops placed on top of each other developed no abscess formation, whereas in the literature’s gold standard procedure, those with a 2 mm distance left between two endoloops developed an inner abdominal abscess formation in 8 (4.9%) of the patients. We believe that this 2 mm dead space distance left between the two endoloops contributes to the formation of the abscess.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

AVLANMIŞ, Ö., IŞIL, R. G., HACİM, A. N., YANAR, H. T. (2018). Role of Laparoscopic Appendectomy Radix Ligation Techniques on the Formation of Inner Abdomen Abscess. Şişli Etfal Hastanesi Tıp Bülteni, Cilt: 52 - Sayı: 3, 164–168. https://ajindex.com/articles/364021

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (12)

  1. Addiss DG, Shaffer N, Fowler BS, Tauxe RV. The epidemiology of appendicitis and appendectomy in the United States. Am J Epidemiol 1990;132:910–25. Lukáš K. The story of Appendix. [Article in Czech]. Cas Lek Cesk. 2015;154:189–93.
  2. Liu Z, Zhang P, Ma Y, Chen H, Zhou Y, Zhang M, et al. Laparoscopy or not: a meta-analysis of the surgical effects of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2010;20:362–70.
  3. Ohtani H, Tamamori Y, Arimoto Y, Nishiguchi Y, Maeda K, Hirakawa K. Meta-analysis of the results of randomized controlled trials that compared laparoscopic and open surgery for acute appendicitis. J Gastrointest Surg 2012;16:1929–39.
  4. Li X, Zhang J, Sang L, Zhang W, Chu Z, Li X, et al. Laparoscopic ver sus sus conventional appendectomy-a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Gastroenterol 2010;10:129. Moore CB, Smith RS, Herbertson R, Toevs C. Does use of intraoperative irrigation with open or laparoscopic appendectomy reduce post-operative intra-abdominal abscess? Am Surg 2011;77:78–80.
  5. St Peter SD, Adibe OO, Iqbal CW, Fike FB, Sharp SW, Juang D, et al. Irrigation versus suction alone during laparoscopic appendectomy for perforated appendicitis: a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg 2012;256:581–5.
  6. Swank HA, Eshuis EJ, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Bemelman WA. Short- and long-term results of open versus laparoscopic appendectomy. World J Surg 2011;35:1221–6.
  7. Kehagias I, Karamanakos SN, Panagiotopoulos S, Panagopoulos K, Kalfarentzos F. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: which way to go? World J Gastroenterol 2008;14:4909–14.
  8. Livingston EH, Woodward WA, Sarosi GA, Haley RW. Disconnect between incidence of nonperforated and perforated appendicitis: implications for pathophysiology and management. Ann Surg 2007;245:886–92.
  9. Oliak D, Yamini D, Udani VM, Lewis RJ, Vargas H, Arnell T, et al. Can perforated appendicitis Be diagnosed preoperatively based on admission factors? J Gastrointest Surg 2000;4:470–4.
  10. Blomqvist PG, Andersson RE, Granath F, Lambe MP, Ekbom AR. Mortality after appendectomy in Sweden, 1987-1996. Ann Surg 2001;233:455–60.
  11. Mihmanli M, Uysalol M, Coşkun H, Demir U, Dilege E, Eroğlu T. The value of 5-hydroxyindolacetic acid levels in spot urine in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg 2004;10:173–6.
  12. Boshnak N, Boshnaq M, Elgohary H. Evaluation of Platelet Indices and Red Cell Distribution Width as New Biomarkers for the Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis. J Invest Surg 2018;3