Dergiler / The Anatolian Journal of Cardiology / 2015 / Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 9

The effects of baseline heart rate recovery normality and exercise training protocol on heart rate recovery in patients with heart failure

Sayfa
727–736
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Baseline HRR might play a role in its response to exercise

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: It is unclear which exercise training protocol yields superior heart rate recovery (HRR) improvement in heart failure (HF) patients.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:We hypothesized that an exercise training protocol and baseline HRR normality would be factors in altering HRR in HF patients.Methods: In this prospective, randomized, controlled and 3 group parallel study, 41 stable HF patients were randomly assigned to 3-timesweekly training sessions for 12 weeks, consisting of i) 30 minutes of interval training (IT) (n=17, 63.7±8.8 years old) versus ii) 30 minutes of continuous training (CT) (n=13, 59.6±6.8 years old) versus iii) no training (CON) (n=11, 60.6±9.9 years old).
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Baseline HRR might play a role in its response to exercise
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Objective: It is unclear which exercise training protocol yields superior heart rate recovery (HRR) improvement in heart failure (HF) patients. Whether baseline HRR normality plays a role in the improvement is unknown. We hypothesized that an exercise training protocol and baseline HRR normality would be factors in altering HRR in HF patients.Methods: In this prospective, randomized, controlled and 3 group parallel study, 41 stable HF patients were randomly assigned to 3-timesweekly training sessions for 12 weeks, consisting of i) 30 minutes of interval training (IT) (n=17, 63.7±8.8 years old) versus ii) 30 minutes of continuous training (CT) (n=13, 59.6±6.8 years old) versus iii) no training (CON) (n=11, 60.6±9.9 years old). Each patient had cardiopulmonary exercise testing before and after the training program. Maximum heart rates attained during the test and heart rates at 1 and 2 min (HRR1 and HRR2) during the recovery phase were recorded. Paired samples t-test or Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used for comparisons before and after training. One-way ANOVA or Kruskal-Wallis variance analysis was used for comparisons among groups.Results: HRR1 was unchanged after training. HRR2 improved in the IT group after training, and post-training HRR2 values were significantly faster in the IT group than in controls. Both HRR1 and HRR2 was significantly faster, irrespective of exercise protocol in patients with abnormal baseline values after training.Conclusion: HRR1 did not improve after training. HRR2 improved only in the IT group. Both HRRs in patients with abnormal baseline values improved after both exercise protocols. IT might be superior to CT in improving HRR2. Baseline HRR might play a role in its response to exercise

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

YAYLALI, Y. T., FINDIKOĞLU, G., YURTDAŞ, M., KONUKÇU, S., ŞENOL, H. (2015). The effects of baseline heart rate recovery normality and exercise training protocol on heart rate recovery in patients with heart failure. The Anatolian Journal of Cardiology, Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 9, 727–736. https://ajindex.com/articles/363875

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (4)

  1. Roger VL, Go AS, Lloyd-Jones DM, Benjamin EJ, Berry JD, Borden WB, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics--2012 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2012; 125: e1002
  2. Selig SE, Carey MF, Menzies DG, Patterson J, Geerling RH, Williams AD, et al. Moderate-intensity resistance exercise training in patients with chronic heart failure improves strength, endurance, heart rate variability, and forearm blood flow. J Card Fail 2004; 10: 21-30. [CrossRef] 3. Samara MA, Tang WHW. Heart Failure with Systolic Dysfunction. In: Griffin BP, Callahan TD, Menon V, et al. editors. Manual of Cardiovascular Medicine. Philadelphia: LWW, 2013.p.148
  3. Nishime EO, Cole CR, Blackstone EH, Pashkow FJ, Lauer MS. Heart rate recovery and treadmill exercise score as predictors of mortality in patients referred for exercise ECG. JAMA 2000; 284: 1392-8. [CrossRef] 5. Hoffman J, Grimm W, Maisch B. Beta blockers in therapy of chronic heart failure. Herz 2002; 27: 150-65
  4. Rognmo Ø, Hetland E, Helgerud J, Hoff J, Slørdahl SA. High intensity aerobic interval exercise is superior to moderate intensity exercise for increasing aerobic capacity in patients with coronary artery disease. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil 2004; 11: 216-22. [CrossRef] 7. Wienbergen H, Hambrecht R. Physical exercise training for cardiovascular diseases. Herz 2012; 37: 486-92. [CrossRef] 8. Shetler K, Marcus R, Froelicher VF, Vora S, Kalisetti D, Prakash M, et al. Heart rate recovery: validation and methodologic issues. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001; 38: 1980-7. [CrossRef] 9. Jolly MA, Brennan DM, Cho L. Impact of exercise on heart rate recovery. Circulation 2011; 124: 1520-6. [CrossRef] 10. Myers J, Hadley D, Oswald U, Bruner K, Kottman W, Hsu L, et al. Effects of exercise training on heart rate recovery in patients with chronic heart failure. Am Heart J 2007; 153: 1056-63. [CrossRef] 11. Anagnostakou V, Chatzimichail K, Dimopoulos S, Karatzanos E, Papazachou O, Tasoulis A, et al. Effects of interval cycle training with or without strength training on vascular reactivity in heart failure patients. J Card Fail 2011; 17: 585-91. [CrossRef] 12. Dimopoulos S, Anastasiou-Nana M, Sakellariou D, Drakos S, Kapsimalakou S, Maroulidis G, et al. Effects of exercise rehabilitation program on heart rate recovery in patients with chronic heart failure. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil 2006; 13: 67-73. [CrossRef] 13. Karvonen MJ, Kentala E, Mustala O. The effects of training on heart rate; a longitudinal