Dergiler / Şişli Etfal Hastanesi Tıp Bülteni / 2018 / Cilt: 52 - Sayı: 3

The Treatment Method and Results of Percutaneous Pinning and Dynamic External Fixator Application for Unstable Distal Radius Fractures

Sayfa
173–178
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Conclusion: Use of the Pennig dynamic wrist fixator in the treatment of unstable distal radius fractures has advantages, such as ease of use, minimal surgical trauma, allowing early rehabilitation, and early return to daily activities as well as increased anatomical and functional results.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:closed reduction and percutaneous fixation followed by application of the Pennig dynamic wrist fixator to allow early wrist motion.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:There were 15 (60%) male and 10 (40%) female patients.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Conclusion: Use of the Pennig dynamic wrist fixator in the treatment of unstable distal radius fractures has advantages, such as ease of use, minimal surgical trauma, allowing early rehabilitation, and early return to daily activities as well as increased anatomical and functional results.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

closed reduction and percutaneous fixation followed by application of the Pennig dynamic wrist fixator to allow early wrist motion. Methods: Twenty-five patients diagnosed with distal radius fracture and treated with closed reduction and percutaneous fixation followed by application of a dynamic wrist fixator were included in the study. There were 15 (60%) male and 10 (40%) female patients. The mean age of the patients was 47.32 (20–76) years. The mean period between initial trauma and operation was 8.52 (1–23) days. All patients were allowed active shoulder, elbow, and finger exercises immediately after surgery. Results: Radiological evaluation was performed according to the criteria described by Sarmiento and modified by Lidström. Results were excellent in 12 (46.15%), good in 11 (42.30%), and fair in 3 (11.55%) patients. No patient had poor result. Functional scores were assessed according to the Gartland–Werley classification and modified by Sarmiento. Results were excellent in 14 (56%), good in 8 (32%), and moderate in 3 (12%) patients. Conclusion: Use of the Pennig dynamic wrist fixator in the treatment of unstable distal radius fractures has advantages, such as ease of use, minimal surgical trauma, allowing early rehabilitation, and early return to daily activities as well as increased anatomical and functional results.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

KARA, A., ERTÜRER, R. E., SEÇKİN, F., AKMAN, Ş., ÖZTÜRK, İ. (2018). The Treatment Method and Results of Percutaneous Pinning and Dynamic External Fixator Application for Unstable Distal Radius Fractures. Şişli Etfal Hastanesi Tıp Bülteni, Cilt: 52 - Sayı: 3, 173–178. https://ajindex.com/articles/363736

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (14)

  1. Ekin A, Yaldiz K, Boya H, Turkyilmaz M: Distal radius kırıklarında açık redüksiyon, plak ve / veya eksternal fiksatör uygulamaları. XV Milli Türk Ortopedi ve Travmatoloji Kongre Kitabı. Ankara: Türk Hava Kurumu Basımevi; 1997. p.117-21.
  2. Seitz WH, Froimson AI, Brooks DB, Postak P, Polando G,Greenwald AS. External fixator pin insertion techniques: biomechanical analysis and clinical relevance. J Hand Surg Am 1991; 16: 560-3.
  3. Werber KD, Raeder F, Brauer RB, Weiss S. External fixation of distal radial fractures: four compared with five pins: a randomized prospective study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003; 85: 660-6.
  4. Markiewitz AD, Gellman H. Five-pin external fixation and early range of motion for distal radius fractures. Orthop Clin North Am 2001; 32: 329-35.
  5. Kreder HJ, Hanel DP, McKee M, Jupiter J, McGillivary G, Swiontkowski MF. Consistency of AO fracture classification for the distal radius. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1996; 78: 726-31.
  6. Illarramendi A, González Della Valle A, Segal E, De Carli P, Maignon G, Gallucci G. Evaluation of simplified Frykman and AO classifications of fractures of the distal radius. Assessment of interobserver and intraobserver agreement. Int Orthop 1998; 22: 111-5.
  7. Horn BD, Rettig ME. Interobserver reliability in the Gustilo and Anderson classification of open fractures. J Orthop Trauma 1993; 7: 357-60.
  8. Sarmiento GW, Zagorski JB, Sınclair WF: Functional bracing of Colles fractures: A prospective study of immobilization in supination, pronation. Clin Orthop 1980; 146: 175-183.
  9. Gartland Jr JJ, Wer]ey CW. Evaluation of healed Colles’ fractures. J Bone Joint Surg 1951; 33: 895-907. Ring D. Intra articular fractures of the distal radius. J Hand Surg Am 2002; 2: 60-77.
  10. Rogachefsky RA, Lipson SR, Applegate B, Ouellette EA, Savenor AM, McAuliffe JA. Treatment of severely comminuted intra-articular fractures of the distal end of the radius by open reduction and combined internal and external fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2001; 83: 509-19.
  11. Altissimi M, Antenucci R, Fiacca C, Mancini GB. Long-term results of conservative treatment of fractures of the distal radius. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1986; 206: 202-10.
  12. Warwick D, Prothero D, Field J, Bannister G. Radiological measurement of radial shortening in Colles' fracture. J Hand Surg Br 1993; 18: 50-2.
  13. Bradway JK, Amadio PC, Cooney WP. Open reduction and internal fixation of displaced, comminuted intra-articular fractures of the distal end of the radius. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1989; 71: 839-47.
  14. Kapoor H, Agarwa