Dergiler / Şişli Etfal Hastanesi Tıp Bülteni / 2020 / Cilt: 54 - Sayı: 3

The Compatibility of Hemoglobin A1c with Oral Glucose Tolerance Test and Fasting Plasma Glucose

Sayfa
351–356
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Thus, it will be possible to revise the diagnostic guidelines accordingly.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objectives: Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a chronic metabolic disease requiring lifelong medical care, and its prevalence is increasingworldwide.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Early diagnosis of prediabetes and diabetes is significant in view of the mortality, morbidity and cost associated withthem.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Thus, it will be possible to revise the diagnostic guidelines accordingly.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2013 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Objectives: Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a chronic metabolic disease requiring lifelong medical care, and its prevalence is increasingworldwide. Early diagnosis of prediabetes and diabetes is significant in view of the mortality, morbidity and cost associated withthem. Because of the difficulties in application and reproducibility of oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), which is considered tobe the gold standard in the diagnosis of DM, more feasible diagnostic tests are needed. This study aims to evaluate the validity ofhemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) in predicting prediabetes and diabetes in the Turkish population and to evaluate the compatibility ofHbA1c with other diagnostic tests.Methods: The patients who were admitted to Health Sciences University Sisli Hamidiye Etfal Training and Research Hospital internaldiseases and endocrinology outpatient clinics between 01.01.2013 and 30.06.2014 enrolled in this study. The participants were>18 years of age and were not diagnosed with prediabetes or DM earlier. The results of OGTT, fasting plasma glucose (FPG) andHbA1c tests were retrospectively screened, and the correlation of them was analyzed.Results: In this study, 201 participants enrolled. Of these cases, 127 were women and 74 were men. Mean age of the group was49.3±10.4 years. HbA1c was observed <5.7% in the 15%, 5.7-6.4% in the 60%, and ≥ 6.5% in the 25% of the cases. While FPG was <100mg/dL in 24% of the participants, it was found to be between 100-126 mg/dL in 71% and ≥126 mg/dL in 5% of the participants. Accordingto the OGTT data, 23% of the cases were healthy, 59% were prediabetic and 18% were diabetic. The sensitivity and specificityof HbA1c were calculated as 50% and 80%, respectively. While the sensitivity of FPG was 17% and specificity was 97%.Conclusion: The data obtained from our study show that HbA1c is a more sensitive test compared to FPG in the diagnosis ofDM. Prospective studies with broad participation at national and international levels are needed to redefine HbA1c cut-offpoints for the diagnosis of DM and prediabetes. Thus, it will be possible to revise the diagnostic guidelines accordingly.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ÇETİN, E. G., DEMIR, N., KALKAN, K., ÖZTÜRKMEN, Y. A., NAZİF, P., YÜCELEN, S. Y., ÇALIM, A., BORLU, F., ALTUNTAŞ, Y. (2020). The Compatibility of Hemoglobin A1c with Oral Glucose Tolerance Test and Fasting Plasma Glucose. Şişli Etfal Hastanesi Tıp Bülteni, Cilt: 54 - Sayı: 3, 351–356. https://ajindex.com/articles/363671

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (11)

  1. Satman İ, İmamoğlu Ş, Yılmaz C, Akalın S, Salman S, Dinççağ N ve Diyabetes Mellitus Çalışma ve Eğitim Grubu.TEMD Diyabetes Mellitus ve Komplikasyonlarının Tanı, Tedavi ve İzlem Kılavuzu-2017
  2. Baskı. Ankara: Bayt Matbaacılık; 2017.s.15
  3. Cho NH, Shaw JE, Karuranga S, et al. IDF Diabetes Atlas: global estimates of diabetes prevalence for 2017 and projections for 2045. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2018;138:271–281
  4. World Health Organization, 2011. Use of glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) in the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus. Abbreviated report of a WHO consultation. http://www.who.int/diabetes/publications/ report-hba1c_2011.pdf [PubMed] 4. American Diabetes Association Classification and diagnosis of diabetes: Standards of medical care in diabetes-2018. Diabetes Care 2018;41:s13–s27
  5. Alberti KG, Zimmet PZ. Definition, diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus and its complications. Part 1. Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus provisional report of a WHO consultation. Diabet Med 1998;15:539–53. 6. van‘t Riet E, Alssema M, Rijkelijkhuizen JM. Relationship between A1C and glucose levels in the general Dutch population: the new Hoorn study. Diabetes Care 2010;33:61–66
  6. Guo F, Moellering DR, Garvey WT. Use of HbA1c for Diagnoses of Diabetes and Prediabetes: Comparison with Diagnoses Based on Fasting and 2-Hr Glucose Values and Effects of Gender, Race, and Age. Metabolic Syndrome and Related Disorders 2014;12(5):258- 268
  7. Yu EYT, Wong CKH, Ho SY et al. Can HbA1c replace OGTT for the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus among Chinese patients with impaired fasting glucose? Family Practice 2015;32(6):631-638
  8. Kumar PR, Bhansali A, Ravikiran M, Bhansali S, Dutta P, Thakur JS, Sachdeva N, Bhadada SK, Walia R. Utility of glycated hemoglobin in diagnosing type 2 diabetes mellitus: a community-based study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2010; 95: 2832–2835
  9. Kim HK, Bae SJ, Choe J. Impact of HbA1c criterion on the detection of subjects with increased risk for diabetes among health check-up recipients in Korea. Diabetes Metab J. 2012;36:151–156
  10. Kim CH, Kim HK, Bae SJ, et al. Discordance between fasting glucose- based and hemoglobin A1c-based diagnosis of diabetes mellitus in Koreans Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2011; 91: s8 - s10
  11. Lorenzo C, Wagenknecht LE, Hanley AJG, et al. A1C between 5.7 and 6.4%as amarker for identifying pre-diabetes, insulin sensitivity and secretion, and cardiovascular risk factors: the Insulin Resistance Atheroscleros