Dergiler / Şişli Etfal Hastanesi Tıp Bülteni / 2019 / Cilt: 53 - Sayı: 1

Prevalence of Atopic Dermatitis Criteria among Textile Workers with Occupational Allergic Contact Dermatitis and Effects of Having Atopic Dermatitis on Contact Antigenic Diversity

Sayfa
58–69
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Textile workers with AD should be warnedabout the possibility of the early development of OACD.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objectives: Contact dermatitis (CD) is a common skin disease.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Individuals with atopic dermatitis (AD) have an increased risk for development ofallergic contact dermatitis (ACD).
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Textile workers with AD should be warnedabout the possibility of the early development of OACD.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Objectives: Contact dermatitis (CD) is a common skin disease. Occupational contact dermatitis (OCD) is the most frequently seenoccupational skin disease and includes both occupational allergic CD (OACD) and occupational irritant CD (OICD). One of the mostcommon sources of OACD is textile products. Individuals with atopic dermatitis (AD) have an increased risk for development ofallergic contact dermatitis (ACD). However, the role of AD in the etiopathogenesis of the development of OACD among textile industry workers is not well known. The aim of the present study was to determine the prevalence of AD among textile workers withOACD and to analyze contact antigenic diversity between the workers with and without AD.Methods: A prospective, cross-sectional study was conducted with 352 textile workers who had previously been diagnosed withOACD. The patients were questioned and examined with respect to AD criteria, demographic features, disease duration, durationof employment until first symptoms, phototype, workplace (subsectors), and location of lesions at control visits. Immediate skintest reactivity was evaluated with a commercial skin prick test panel. The data obtained and the patients’ previously recordedpatch test results were compared in OACD groups with and without a diagnosis of AD. The results were statistically evaluated witha significance level of p value <0.05.Results: The study population consisted of 124 males and 227 females. The mean age was 35.69±13.65 years. The most commonlyseen employment duration, phototype, subsector, and location were 4 to 8 months (26.14%), 9 to 12 months (34.66%), Fitzpatricktype-III (37.50%), dyeing (33.52%), and exclusively the hands (60.51%), respectively. In all, 193 patients (54.83%) met the criteriafor the diagnosis of AD. In the OACD group with AD, there was a significant number with 4 major and 16 minor criteria, as well aspositivity for 14 contact allergens.Conclusion: Most AD criteria, or a diagnosis of AD, are highly detectable among workers with textile-related OACD. The results forpatch test allergens may be significantly higher than those of individuals without AD. Textile workers with AD should be warnedabout the possibility of the early development of OACD.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

TAŞ, B., ALTUNAY, İ. K. (2019). Prevalence of Atopic Dermatitis Criteria among Textile Workers with Occupational Allergic Contact Dermatitis and Effects of Having Atopic Dermatitis on Contact Antigenic Diversity. Şişli Etfal Hastanesi Tıp Bülteni, Cilt: 53 - Sayı: 1, 58–69. https://ajindex.com/articles/363434

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (16)

  1. Odhiambo JA, Williams HC, Clayton TO, Robertson CF, Asher MI; ISAAC Phase Three Study Group. Global variations in prevalence of eczema symptoms in children from ISAAC Phase Three. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2009;124:1251–8
  2. Spiewak R. Contact dermatitis in atopic individuals. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol 2012;12:491–7
  3. Herro EM, Matiz C, Sullivan K, Hamann C, Jacob SE. Frequency of contact allergens in pediatric patients with atopic dermatitis. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol 2011;4:39–41
  4. Kirchhof MG, de Gannes GC. Atopy Associated With Positive Patch Test and Possible Allergic Contact Dermatitis. J Cutan Med Surg 2018;22:405–10
  5. Malajian D, Belsito DV. Cutaneous delayed-type hypersensitivity in patients with atopic dermatitis. J Am Acad Dermatol 2013;69:232–7
  6. Tada J. Diagnostic Standard for Atopic Dermatitis. Japan Med Assoc J 2002;45:460–5
  7. Proksch E, Brasch J. Abnormal epidermal barrier in the pathogenesis of contact dermatitis. Clin Dermatol 2012;30:335–44
  8. Wigger-Alberti W, Elsner P. Occupational Contact Dermatitis in the Textile Industry. In: Elsner P, Hatch K, Wigger-Alberti W, editors. Textiles and the Skin, Curr Probl Dermatol, 1st ed. Basel: Karger; 2003. p. 114–22
  9. Heinzerling L, Mari A, Bergmann KC, Bresciani M, Burbach G, Darsow U, et al. The skin prick test - European standards. Clin Transl Allergy 2013;3:3
  10. Tanno LK, Darlenski R, Sánchez-Garcia S, Bonini M, Vereda A, Kolkhir P, et al. International survey on skin patch test procedures, attitudes and interpretation. World Allergy Organ J 2016;9:8
  11. Nicholson PJ. Evidence-based guidelines: occupational contact dermatitis and urticaria. Occup Med (Lond) 2010;60:502–4
  12. Thyssen JP, Johansen JD, Linneberg A, Menné T, Engkilde K. The association between contact sensitization and atopic disease by linkage of a clinical database and a nationwide patient registry. Allergy 2012;67:1157–64
  13. Uehara M, Sawai T. A longitudinal study of contact sensitivity in patients with atopic dermatitis. Arch Dermatol 1989;125:366–8
  14. Mailhol C, Lauwers-Cances V, Rancé F, Paul C, Giordano-Labadie F. Prevalence and risk factors for allergic contact dermatitis to topical treatment in atopicdermatitis: a study in 641 children. Allergy 2009;64:801–6
  15. Czarnobilska E, Obtulowicz K, Dyga W, Spiewak R. A half of schoolchildren with 'ISAAC eczema' are ill with allergic contact dermatitis. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2011;25:1104–7
  16. Green CM, Holden CR, Gawkrodger DJ. Contact allergy