Dergiler / Şişli Etfal Hastanesi Tıp Bülteni / 2019 / Cilt: 53 - Sayı: 3

Clinical and Laboratory Characteristics of Patients with Food Allergy: Single-Center Experience

Sayfa
296–299
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Evaluation of the patients with atopic dermatitis in terms of food allergy may beappropriate.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objectives: This study aimed to examine the clinical and laboratory features of the patients diagnosed with food allergy whoapplied to the pediatric allergy outpatient clinic.Methods: This study was performed between March 2016 and December 2017 as a cross-sectional observational study.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The filesof 90 patients with food allergy were evaluated retrospectively.Results: Ninety patients were included in the study.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Evaluation of the patients with atopic dermatitis in terms of food allergy may beappropriate.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2016 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Objectives: This study aimed to examine the clinical and laboratory features of the patients diagnosed with food allergy whoapplied to the pediatric allergy outpatient clinic.Methods: This study was performed between March 2016 and December 2017 as a cross-sectional observational study. The filesof 90 patients with food allergy were evaluated retrospectively.Results: Ninety patients were included in the study. Sixty three (70%) of the cases were male and 27 (30%) were female. The medianage of the patients was 12 months (range 3-156), and the age at onset of symptoms was 4 months (1-156). At the time of thediagnosis, the total number of eosinophils was 410/mm3 (0-4600), and the total IgE value was 83.1 IU/ml (3.17-2500). When thecases were divided into two groups according to their gender, no significant difference was found between the groups regardingthe median age, onset age of the symptoms, total IgE, eosinophil and specific IgE levels. Fifty (55.6%) cases had atopic dermatitis,31 (34.4%) had urticaria, 6 (6.7%) had proctocolitis, 2 (2.2%) had angioedema and 1 (1.1%) had anaphylaxis. Thirty-four (37.8%) ofthe cases had IgE-mediated, six (6.7%) cases had non-IgE mediated, and 50 (55.5%) cases had mixed type food allergy. The mostcommon food allergens were egg 29 (32.2%), cow’s milk and egg 27 (30%) and cow’s milk 22 (24.4%). In the skin prick test, sensitivitywas found in 52 (57.7%) patients. The most common sensitization was against egg (22.2%). Specific IgE values were found asF1: 0.87 kU/L (0.10-100), F2: 0.30 kU/L (0.10-96.90) and F5: 0.48 kU/L (0.10-53).Conclusion: Egg and cow’s milk allergy were the most common food allergens in our study. However; more than half of the patientswere diagnosed with atopic dermatitis. Evaluation of the patients with atopic dermatitis in terms of food allergy may beappropriate.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

CAN, C., ALTINEL, N., BÜLBÜL, L., CİVAN, H. A., HATİPOĞLU, S. (2019). Clinical and Laboratory Characteristics of Patients with Food Allergy: Single-Center Experience. Şişli Etfal Hastanesi Tıp Bülteni, Cilt: 53 - Sayı: 3, 296–299. https://ajindex.com/articles/363411

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (15)

  1. Johansson SG, Bieber T, Dahl R, Friedmann PS, Lanier BQ, Lockey RF, et al. Revised nomenclature for allergy for global use: Report of the NomenclatureReview Committee of the World Allergy Organization, October 2003. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2004;113:832– 6
  2. Nowak-Wegrzyn A, Sampson HA. Adverse reactions to foods. Med Clin North Am 2006;90:97–127
  3. Allen KJ, Koplin JJ. The epidemiology of IgE-mediated food allergy and anaphylaxis. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am 2012;32:35–50
  4. Sicherer SH, Sampson HA. Food allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2010;125:S116–25
  5. Ebisawa M, Ito K, Fujisawa T; Committee for Japanese Pediatric Guideline for Food Allergy, The Japanese Society of Pediatric Allergy and Clinical Immunology, The Japanese Society of Allergology. Japanese guidelines for food allergy 2017. Allergol Int 2017;66:248–264
  6. Yavuz T, Saçkesen C. İnek sütü alerjisi. Katkı Pediatri Dergisi 2012;34:81–90
  7. Altıntaş D U, Büyüktiryaki B. Besin alerjisi Türk ulusal rehberi 2017. Astım Allerji İmmunoloji Dergisi (ek sayı 1) 2017;15:76
  8. Akdis CA, Akdis M, Bieber T, Bindslev-Jensen C, Boguniewicz M, Eigenmann P, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of atopic dermatitis in children and adults: EuropeanAcademy of Allergology and Clinical Immunology/American Academy of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology/PRACTALL Consensus Report. Allergy 2006;61:969– 87
  9. Vickery BP, Burks W. Oral immunotherapy for food allergy. Curr Opin Pediatr 2010;22:765–70
  10. Anagnostou K, Meyer R, Fox A, Shah N. The rapidly changing world of food allergy in children. F1000Prime Rep 2015;7:35
  11. Martin R, Nauta AJ, Ben Amor K, Knippels LM, Knol J, Garssen J. Early life: gut microbiota and immune development in infancy. Benef Microbes 2010;1:367–82
  12. Wood Robert A. Food allergy in children: Prevalence, natural history, and monitoring for resolution. Available at: https://www. uptodate.com/contents/food-allergy-in-children-prevalence-natural- history-and-monitoring-for-resolution? Accessed Oct 26, 2018
  13. Orhan F, Karakas T, Cakir M, Aksoy A, Baki A, Gedik Y. Prevalence of immunoglobulin E-mediated food allergy in 6-9-year-old urban schoolchildren in the eastern Black Sea region of Turkey. Clin Exp Allergy 2009;39:1027–35
  14. Doğruel D, Bingöl G, Altıntaş DU, Yılmaz M, Güneşer Kendirli S. Clinical Features of Food Allergy during the 1st Year of Life: The ADAPAR BirthCohort Study. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 2016;169:171–80
  15. Rona RJ, Keil T, Summers C, Gislason D, Zuidmeer L, Sodergren