KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / The Journal of Pediatric Research / 2020 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 3

Examining the Effect of a Program Developed to Address Bullying in Primary Schools

Hülya KARATAŞ
Candan ÖZTÜRK
Sayfa
243–249
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

No significant difference was determined in the group-time interaction (F=1.10,p=0.349).Conclusion: It was found that the bullying prevention program based on the Social Cognitive Theory is effective in decreasing the rates ofstudents who are bullies or are the victims of bullying, and this effect continues in the victims through to the end of the 1st year; however, itbecomes nonsignificant in bullies by the end of the 1st year.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Aim: The purpose of this study is to evaluate effectiveness of a bullying prevention program developed using an integrated approach, in theshort-term and long-term, in primary schools.Materials and Methods: This study was made using a quasi-experimental control group pretest-posttest design; one of the experimentalresearch methods.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:This study comprised 113 students receiving 6th grade education at 2 randomly selected schools in the districts of Konakand Karabağlar, in Izmir, Turkey.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:No significant difference was determined in the group-time interaction (F=1.10,p=0.349).Conclusion: It was found that the bullying prevention program based on the Social Cognitive Theory is effective in decreasing the rates ofstudents who are bullies or are the victims of bullying, and this effect continues in the victims through to the end of the 1st year; however, itbecomes nonsignificant in bullies by the end of the 1st year.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Aim: The purpose of this study is to evaluate effectiveness of a bullying prevention program developed using an integrated approach, in theshort-term and long-term, in primary schools.Materials and Methods: This study was made using a quasi-experimental control group pretest-posttest design; one of the experimentalresearch methods. This study comprised 113 students receiving 6th grade education at 2 randomly selected schools in the districts of Konakand Karabağlar, in Izmir, Turkey. The data were gathered using the Demographic Data Questionnaire and The Peer Bully Adolescent Form. Inthe experimental group, students attended a bullying prevention program and their parents and teachers attended seminars for 5 weeks. Thedata were collected before the training, 2 weeks after the training, at the 6th month, and at 1 year after the training. In the analysis of the data,ANOVA was used in repetitive measurements and t-tests were used in dependent and independent groups with Bonferroni correction.Results: A statistically significant difference was found among the control and experimental group victim subdimension point averages inthe group interaction (F=68.28, p=0.001), time interaction (F=7.39, p=0.001), and group-time interaction (F=14.04, p=0.001). A statisticallysignificant difference was found between the control and experimental group bully subdimension point averages in the group interaction(F=7.63, p=0.007) and time interaction (F=20.21, p=0.001). No significant difference was determined in the group-time interaction (F=1.10,p=0.349).Conclusion: It was found that the bullying prevention program based on the Social Cognitive Theory is effective in decreasing the rates ofstudents who are bullies or are the victims of bullying, and this effect continues in the victims through to the end of the 1st year; however, itbecomes nonsignificant in bullies by the end of the 1st year.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

KARATAŞ, H., ÖZTÜRK, C. (2020). Examining the Effect of a Program Developed to Address Bullying in Primary Schools. The Journal of Pediatric Research, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 3, 243–249. https://ajindex.com/articles/362993

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (16)

  1. Olweus D. Bullying at school: what we know and what we can do. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers 1993
  2. Ortega R, Lera MJ. The sevile anti-bullying in school project. Agressive Behavior 2000; 26:113-23
  3. O’Moore MA, Minton JS. Evulation of the effectiveness of an anti-bullying programme in primary schools. Aggressive Behavior 2005; 31:609-22
  4. Salmivalli C, Kaukiainen A, Voeten M. Anti-bullying intervention: implementation and outcome. Br J Educ Psychol 2005; 75:465- 87
  5. Hunt C. The effect of an education program on attitudes and belief about bullying and bullying behavior in junior secondary school students. Child and Adolescent Mental Health 2007; 12:21-6
  6. Andreou E, Didaskalou E, Vlachou A. Evaluating the effectiveness of a curriculum-based anti-bullying ıntervention program in Greek primary schools. Educational Psychology 2007; 27:693- 711
  7. Yaakub NF, Haron F, Leong GC. Examining the efficacy of the Olweus prevention programme in reducing bullying: the Malaysian experience. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 2010; 5:595-8
  8. Beran TN, Tuty L, Steinrath G. An evaluation of a bullying prevention program for elemantary schools. Canadian Journal of School Psychology 2004; 19:99-116
  9. Baldry CA, Farrıngton PD. Evoluation of an intervention program for the reduction of bullying and victimization in school. Aggressive Behavior 2004; 30:1-15
  10. Stevens V, Oost VP, Bourdeaudhuij D. The effects of an antibullying intervention programme on peers’ attitudes and behaviour. Journal of Adolescence 2000; 23:21-34
  11. Orpinas P, Horne AM, Staniszewski D. School bullying: changing the problem by changing the school. School Psychology Review 2003; 32:431-44
  12. Fekkes M, Pijpers IMF, Verloove-Vanhorick PS. Effects of antibullying school program on bullying and health complaints. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2006; 160:638-44
  13. Hara H. Justifications for bullying among Japanese schoolchildren. Asian Journal of Social Psychology 2002; 5:197- 204
  14. Scheithauer H, Hayer T, Petermann F, Jugert G. Physical, verbal and relational forms of bullying among german students: age trends, gender differences and correlates. Aggressive Behavior 2006; 23:261-75
  15. Alikaşifoğlu M, Erginöz E, Ercan O, Uysal Ö, Albayrak-Kaymak D. Bullying behaviours and psychosocial health: results from a cross-sectional survey among high school students in İstanbul, Turkey. Eur J Pediatr 2007; 166:1253-60
  16. Karaman Kepenekci Y, Çınkır Ş. Bullying among Turkish high school stu