Dergiler / The Journal of Pediatric Research / 2019 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 3

Peer Bullying in the Preadolescent Stage: Frequency and Types of Bullying and the Affecting Factors

Sayfa
169–179
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Boys were bullied 1.5 times more than girls, and the students of separated parents were bullied 2.7 times more than those whose parents stayed together (p<0.05).Conclusion: As bullying within schools is an important problem, it may be advisable to take into account the factors affecting bullying (age, gender, economic situation, family structure, attitude toward school, etc.) when conducting studies to prevent bullying in schools.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Aim: This study was conducted to determine the types, frequencies and the affecting factors of peer bullying among 6th, 7th, and 8th grade students of secondary schools in a city center in Cappadocia.Materials and Methods: A total of 3.059 students were attending secondary schools in a city center and this study sample consists of 1.288 students.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Data were collected via individual information forms and the Traditional Peer Bullying scale by the researcher through face-to-face interviews and the data obtained were evaluated by chi-square, single, and multiple logistic regression analysis.Results: It was determined that the mean age of the students was 12.81±0.93 years, of them 51.7% were girls, 12.0% did bullying, 15.9% were exposed to bullying, 52.1% were exposed to verbal bullying, and 13.4% were exposed to physical bullying.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Boys were bullied 1.5 times more than girls, and the students of separated parents were bullied 2.7 times more than those whose parents stayed together (p<0.05).Conclusion: As bullying within schools is an important problem, it may be advisable to take into account the factors affecting bullying (age, gender, economic situation, family structure, attitude toward school, etc.) when conducting studies to prevent bullying in schools.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Aim: This study was conducted to determine the types, frequencies and the affecting factors of peer bullying among 6th, 7th, and 8th grade students of secondary schools in a city center in Cappadocia.Materials and Methods: A total of 3.059 students were attending secondary schools in a city center and this study sample consists of 1.288 students. Prior to the study, approval from the ethical council and institute, as well as written consent from students and their families were obtained. Data were collected via individual information forms and the Traditional Peer Bullying scale by the researcher through face-to-face interviews and the data obtained were evaluated by chi-square, single, and multiple logistic regression analysis.Results: It was determined that the mean age of the students was 12.81±0.93 years, of them 51.7% were girls, 12.0% did bullying, 15.9% were exposed to bullying, 52.1% were exposed to verbal bullying, and 13.4% were exposed to physical bullying. Multiple logistic regression revealed that the most important factors affecting the bullying of other students were family structure, attitude towards school, and gender; those factors affecting exposure to bullying were attitude toward school, body mass index, and economical status. As the age of the students increased by one year, the likelihood of bullying increased by 1.2 times. Boys were bullied 1.5 times more than girls, and the students of separated parents were bullied 2.7 times more than those whose parents stayed together (p<0.05).Conclusion: As bullying within schools is an important problem, it may be advisable to take into account the factors affecting bullying (age, gender, economic situation, family structure, attitude toward school, etc.) when conducting studies to prevent bullying in schools.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ÇALIŞKAN, Z., EVGİN, D., BAYAT, M., CANER, N., KAPLAN, B., ÖZTÜRK, A., KEKLİK, D. (2019). Peer Bullying in the Preadolescent Stage: Frequency and Types of Bullying and the Affecting Factors. The Journal of Pediatric Research, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 3, 169–179. https://ajindex.com/articles/362909

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (18)

  1. Liu J, Graves N. Childhood bullying: A review of constructs, concepts, and nursing implications. Public Health Nurs 2011;28:556-68
  2. Rigby K, Johnson K. The prevalence and effectiveness of anti-bullying strategies employed in Australian schools. Adelaide: University of South Australia, 2016
  3. Holt MK, Green JG, Tsay-Vogel M, Davidson J, Brown C. Multidisciplinary approaches to research on bullying in adolescence. Adolescent Res Rev 2016;2:1-10
  4. Coşkun S, Bebiş H. The effect of violence to the school health and nursing. Cumhuriyet Nurs J 2014;3:15-23
  5. Brank EM, Hoetger LA, Hazen KP. Bullying. Annu Rev of Law and Soc Sci 2012;8:213-30
  6. Karataş H, Öztürk C. Approach to bullying with social cognitive theory. DEUHEFED 2009;2:61-74
  7. Olweus DA. A profile of bullying at school. Educational Leadership 2003;60:12
  8. Vanderbilt D, Augustyn M. The effects of bullying. Paediatrics and child health 2010;20:315-20
  9. Shetgiri R. Bullying and victimization among children. Adv Pediatr 2013;60:33-51
  10. Menesini E, Salmivalli C. Bullying in schools: The state of knowledge and effective interventions. Psychol Health Med 2017;22:240-53
  11. Wei HS, Chang HH, Chen JK. Bullying and victimisation among Taiwanese students in special schools. Int J Disabil Dev and Educ 2016;63:246-59
  12. Wu J, He Y, Lu C, et al. Bullying behaviors among Chinese school-aged youth: A prevalence and correlates study in Guangdong province. Psychiatry Res 2014;225:716-22
  13. Inchley J, Currie D, Young T, et al. Growing up unequal: Gender and socioeconomic differences in young people’s health and well-being. HBSC International Report From the 2013/2014 survey. WHO, Health Policy Children and Adolescents 2016;7:197-205
  14. Zych I, Ortega-Ruiz R, Del Rey R. Systematic review of theoretical studies on bullying and cyberbullying: Facts, knowledge, prevention, and intervention. Aggress Violent Behav 2015;23:1-21
  15. Elgar FJ, McKinnon B, Walsh SD, et al. Structural deter-minants of youth bullying and fighting in 79 countries. J Adolesc Health 2015;57:643-50
  16. Modecki KL, Minchin J, Harbaugh AG, Guerra NG, Runions KC. Bullying prevalence across contexts: A meta-analysis measuring cyber and traditional bullying. J Adolesc Health 2014;55:602-11
  17. National Center for Education Statistics. (2016). Indicators of School Crime and Safety: 2016. U.S. Department of Education. https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2017/2017064.pdf Available date: 20.11.2018
  18. Kapçı EG. The relationship between expo