Dergiler / The Journal of Pediatric Research / 2018 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2

Assessment of Endotracheal Tube Position After Oral Intubation in Neonates

Sayfa
71–75
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

As this rule has low accuracyfor extremely low birth weight neonates, its reliability may not be high for neonates weighing less than 3 kg in weight.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Aim: Endotracheal intubation is a common procedure in the delivery room and neonatal intensive care unit.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The initial ETT depth of insertion had been calculatedusing the Tochen 7-8-9 rule.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:As this rule has low accuracyfor extremely low birth weight neonates, its reliability may not be high for neonates weighing less than 3 kg in weight.
🔬Tür:Literatür & Derleme Çalışması
📍Kapsam:2000 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Aim: Endotracheal intubation is a common procedure in the delivery room and neonatal intensive care unit. We aimed to determine the accuracy ofthis method of endotracheal tube (ETT) placement in our neonatal cohort.Materials and Methods: Data on infants requiring oral intubation were reviewed retrospectively. The initial ETT depth of insertion had been calculatedusing the Tochen 7-8-9 rule. The initial depth was compared to the mid-tracheal region. The differences between the initial and ideal depth wascalculated and divided by the mid-tracheal distance. Infants were grouped according to their weights as ≤1000 g, 1001 to 2000 g, 2001 to 3000 g and≥3001 g.Results: We evaluated ETT placement in 160 neonates. The mean gestational age was 32.2±4.4 weeks (23 to 41 weeks) and the mean weight was1989±829 g (560 to 3800 g). The mean range of the difference between the initial depth and ideal depth divided by mid-tracheal distance was0.39±0.04, 0.35±0.04, 0.46±0.05, and 0.23±0.04 in infants weighing ≤1000 g, 1001 to 2000 g, 2001 to 3000 g and ≥3001 g respectively (p=0.025).The differences between the 2001-3000 g group and the 1001-2000, also the 2001-3000 g group and the ≥3001 g group were statistically significant(p<0.05).Conclusion: The 7-8-9 rule should be used to assess ETT length in neonates, especially in those weighing more than 3 kg. As this rule has low accuracyfor extremely low birth weight neonates, its reliability may not be high for neonates weighing less than 3 kg in weight.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

GÜL, A., TAKCI, Ş., İNCE, D. A., ÜNÜVAR, Ş. (2018). Assessment of Endotracheal Tube Position After Oral Intubation in Neonates. The Journal of Pediatric Research, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2, 71–75. https://ajindex.com/articles/362798

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (11)

  1. O’Donnell CP, Kamlin CO, Davis PG, Morley CJ. Endotracheal intubation attempts during neonatal resuscitation: success rates, duration, and adverse effects. Pediatrics 2006;117:16-21.
  2. Niermeyer S, Kattwinkel J, Van Reempts P, et al. International Guidelines for Neonatal Resuscitation: An excerpt from the Guidelines 2000 for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care: International Consensus on Science. Contributors and Reviewers for the Neonatal Resuscitation Guidelines. Pediatrics 2000;106:E29. Schmölzer GM, Roehr CC. Techniques to ascertain correct endotracheal tube placement in neonates. Cochrane Libr 2014.
  3. Leone TA, Rich W, Finer NN. Neonatal intubation: success of pediatric trainees. J Pediatr 2005;146:638-41.
  4. McMillan DD, Rademaker AW, Buchan KA, Reid A, Machin G, Sauve RS. Benefits of orotracheal and nasotracheal intubation in neonates requiring ventilatory assistance. Pediatrics 1986;77:39- 44. Mulcaster JT, Mills J, Hung OR, et al. Laryngoscopic IntubationLearning and Performance. Anesthesiology 2003;98:23-7. Tochen ML. Orotracheal intubation in the newborn infant: a method for determining depth of tube insertion. J Pediatr 1979;95:1050-1.
  5. Mainie P, Carmichael A, McCullough S, Kempley S. Endotracheal tube position in neonates requiring emergency interhospital transfer. Am J Perinatol 2006;16:121-4.
  6. Wang TC, Kuo LL, Lee CY. Utilizing nasal-tragus length to estimate optimal endotracheal tube depth for neonates in Taiwan. Indian J Pediatr 2011;78:296-300.
  7. Çoban A, Kırımi E, Kültürsaray N, et al. 5. Ders: Alternatif Havayolları: Endotrakeal tüp ve Laringeal maske İçinde: Çoban A, (ed). Yenidoğan Canlandırma Programı (NRP) Uygulayıcı Eğitim Kurs Kitabı. Ankara,
  8. Turkey, TC Sağlık Bakanlığı, 2017;19- 21. Embleton ND, Deshpande SA, Scott D, Wright C, Milligan DW. Foot length, an accurate predictor of nasotracheal tube length in neonates. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2001;85:60-4.
  9. Kattwinkel J, Perlman JM, Aziz K, et al. Part 15: neonatal resuscitation 2010 american heart association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Circulation 2010;122(18 Suppl 3):909-19.
  10. Peterson J, Johnson N, Deakins K, Wilson-Costello D, Jelovsek J, Chatburn R. Accuracy of the 7-8-9 Rule for endotracheal tube placement in the neonate. J Perinatol. 2006;26:333-6.
  11. Lee YS, Soong WJ, Jeng MJ, et al. Endotracheal Tube Position in Pediatrics and Neo ates: Comparison Between Flexible Fiberoptic Bronchoscopy and Chest Radio