In addition to training women by emphasizing the importance of breast self-examination in early diagnosis, the breast cancer risk questionnaire - an easy to implement, simple and costless tool - is recommended to be administered in the primary health care centers.
📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale
🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: ftis study was performed to determine the breast cancer risk levels and its relation with the frequency of breast self-examination prac- tices in women who were 20 years old and over.Materials and Methods: ftis descriptive study was conducted on 867 women, who were 20 years old and over presenting to a family medicine outpatient clinic for any reasons. fte participants filled in the “Breast Cancer Risk Assessment Form” which is recommended to assess the risk of breast cancer by the Ministry of Health. fte participants’ risk levels have been classified as low, medium, high, and the highest risk.Results: fte mean age of the participating women was 38.2±13.4 years, 69.7% (n=604) were married, 54.8% (n=475) were housewives, 33.9% (n=294) were working, 42.7% were graduated from primary school. fte average risk score of the patients for breast cancer was 131.26 ±45.11 (50- 325).
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:As a result of this study, 87.3% (n=757) of the women were identified as having a low breast cancer risk, 12.6% (n=109) medium and 0.1% (n=1) of them were identified as having a high risk. fte data demonstrated that 75.5% (n=655) of the women weren’t doing breast self-examination (BSE). fte rate of previous breast USG or mammography screening was 33.7% (n=292). ftere were no statistical relations between the breast cancer risk levels and BSE (p=0.396).Conclusion: fte risk of developing breast cancer was low among the women in the study group and breast self-examination rates were insufficient.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:In addition to training women by emphasizing the importance of breast self-examination in early diagnosis, the breast cancer risk questionnaire - an easy to implement, simple and costless tool - is recommended to be administered in the primary health care centers.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri
Özet
Objective: ftis study was performed to determine the breast cancer risk levels and its relation with the frequency of breast self-examination prac- tices in women who were 20 years old and over.Materials and Methods: ftis descriptive study was conducted on 867 women, who were 20 years old and over presenting to a family medicine outpatient clinic for any reasons. fte participants filled in the “Breast Cancer Risk Assessment Form” which is recommended to assess the risk of breast cancer by the Ministry of Health. fte participants’ risk levels have been classified as low, medium, high, and the highest risk.Results: fte mean age of the participating women was 38.2±13.4 years, 69.7% (n=604) were married, 54.8% (n=475) were housewives, 33.9% (n=294) were working, 42.7% were graduated from primary school. fte average risk score of the patients for breast cancer was 131.26 ±45.11 (50- 325). As a result of this study, 87.3% (n=757) of the women were identified as having a low breast cancer risk, 12.6% (n=109) medium and 0.1% (n=1) of them were identified as having a high risk. fte data demonstrated that 75.5% (n=655) of the women weren’t doing breast self-examination (BSE). fte rate of previous breast USG or mammography screening was 33.7% (n=292). ftere were no statistical relations between the breast cancer risk levels and BSE (p=0.396).Conclusion: fte risk of developing breast cancer was low among the women in the study group and breast self-examination rates were insufficient. In addition to training women by emphasizing the importance of breast self-examination in early diagnosis, the breast cancer risk questionnaire - an easy to implement, simple and costless tool - is recommended to be administered in the primary health care centers.
🔖
Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap
KUTLU, R., BİÇER, Ü. (2017). Evaluation of Breast Cancer Risk Levels and Its Relation with Breast Self-Examination Practices in Women. The Journal of Breast Health, Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 1, 34–39. https://ajindex.com/articles/362643
Eser S, Yakut C, Ozdemir R, Karakılınc H, Ozalan S, Marshall SF, Karaoğlanoğlu O, Anbarcıoğlu Z, Ucuncu N, Akın U, Ozen E, Ozgul N, Anton-Culver H, Tuncer M. Cancer incidence rates in Turkey in 2006: A detailed registry based estimation. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2006; 11:1731-1739. (PMID: 21338224) Stewart BW, Wild C. International AgencyforResearch on Cancer; World Health Organization. World Cancer Report 2014. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2014. International Agency for Research on Cancer, IARC. GLOBOCAN 2008, Cancer Fact Sheet.2010, http://globocan.iarc.fr/. Date accessed: 25.08.2015.
World Cancer Report, International Agency for Research on Cancer. (ed. Boyl P, Levin B.) Lyon: WHO Press 2008. Global Burden of Disease Cancer Collaboration, Fitzmaurice C, Dicker D, Pain A, Hamavid H, Moradi-Lakeh M, MacIntyre MF, Allen C, Han- sen G, Woodbrook R, Wolfe C, Hamadeh RR, Moore A, Werdecker A, Gessner BD, Te Ao B, McMahon B, Karimkhani C, Yu C, Cooke GS, Schwebel DC, Carpenter DO, Pereira DM, Nash D, Kazi DS, De Leo D, Plass D, Ukwaja KN, fturston GD, Yun Jin K, Simard EP, Mills E, Park EK. fte Global Burden of Cancer 2013. JAMA Oncol 2015; 1:505-527. (PMID: 26181261) Sağlık Bakanlığı. Sağlık istatistikleri yıllığı 2010. 2011, http://www.sa- glik.gov.tr/TR/dosya/1-72577/h/saglikistatistikleriyilligi2010.pdf?ret=0. Erişim Tarihi: 25.08.2015.
Özmen V, Fidaner C, Aksaz E, Bayol Ü, Dede İ Göker E, Güllüoğlu BM, Işıkdoğan A, Topal U, Uhri M, Utkan Z, Zengin N, Tuncer M. Türkiye’de meme kanseri erken tanı ve tarama programlarının hazırlanması “Sağlık Bakanlığı Meme Kanseri Erken Tanı ve Tarama Alt Kurulu Raporu”. J Breast Health 2009; 5:125-134.
Ersin F, Bahar Z. Sağlığı Geliştirme Modelleri’nin Meme Kanseri Erken Tanı Davranışlarına Etkisi: Bir Literatür Derlemesi. DEUHYO ED 2012; 5:28-38.
Anderson BO, Shyyan R, Eniu A, Smith RA, Yip CH, Bese NS, Chow LW, Masood S, Ramsey SD, Carlson RW. Breast cancer in limited-re- source countries: an overview of the Breast Health Global Initiative 2005 guidelines. Breast J 2006; 12:S3-15. (PMID: 16430397) [CrossRef] National Institutes of Health. Clinical guidelines on the identification, evaluation, and treatment of overweight and obesity in adults: the evi- dence report. Obes Res 1998; 6:51S-209S. (PMID: 9813653). T.C. Sağlık Bakanlığı, Ana Çocuk Sağlığı ve Aile Planlaması Genel Müdürlüğü. Ulusal Aile Planlaması Hizmet Rehberi, Dördüncü Basım, Damla Matbaası, Cilt 1, Ankara. 2005:85-116.