Dergiler / The Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education / 2008 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 4

PREFERENCES ON INTERNET BASED LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS IN STUDENT-CENTERED EDUCATION

Sayfa
154–175
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The lowest average scores of the sample group were observed in the internet-based learning environment of Episthemologic awareness.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Nowadays, educational systems are being questionned to find effective solutions to problems that are being encountered, and discussions are centered on the ways of restructuring systems so as to overcome difficulties.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:This study aims at determining teacher candidates’ preferences regarding internetbased learning environments in student-centered education by involving the teacher candidates enrolled at Osmangazi University, Faculty of Education, Primary School Teaching, Mathematics Teaching and Computer and Educational Technologies Education programmes.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The lowest average scores of the sample group were observed in the internet-based learning environment of Episthemologic awareness.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Nowadays, educational systems are being questionned to find effective solutions to problems that are being encountered, and discussions are centered on the ways of restructuring systems so as to overcome difficulties. As the consequences of the traditional teaching approach, we can indicate that the taught material is not longlasting but easily forgotten, that students do not sufficiently acquire the knowledge and skills that are aimed at developing, and that students lack transferring their knowledge to real life. In our current situation, individuals prefer to use educational resources where and when they want, based on their individual skills and abilities. Throughout the world, because the internet infrastructure has developed quite rapidly, it has been offered as an alternative way for a rich learning and teaching environment. This study aims at determining teacher candidates’ preferences regarding internetbased learning environments in student-centered education by involving the teacher candidates enrolled at Osmangazi University, Faculty of Education, Primary School Teaching, Mathematics Teaching and Computer and Educational Technologies Education programmes. This study is a descriptive study. The data collection scale consists of the “Constructivist Internet-based Education of Science Scale (CILES-S)”. The sample group of teacher candidates in the study showed differences with respect to their preferences regarding internet-based learning in student-centered education. The candidates scored higher in the internet-based learning environments of Cognitive Development and Critical Judgement. The lowest average scores of the sample group were observed in the internet-based learning environment of Episthemologic awareness.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ÇUBUKÇU, Z. (2008). PREFERENCES ON INTERNET BASED LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS IN STUDENT-CENTERED EDUCATION. The Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 4, 154–175. https://ajindex.com/articles/362078

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (5)

  1. Wen, M. L.; Tsai, Chin-Chung; Lin, Hung-Ming; Chuang, Shih-Chyueh. (2004). Cognitive-Metacognitive and Content-Technical Aspects of Constructivist Internet-Based Learning Environments: A LISREL Analysis. Computers and Education, 43 (3), 237-248.
  2. De La Harpe, B., Kulski, M. and Radloff, A. (1999). How Best to Document The Quality of Our Teaching and Our Students’ Learning? In: Martin, K., Stanley, N. and Davison, N., Editors,Teaching in The Disciplines: Learning in Context. Proceedings of The Eighth Annual Teachin Learning Forum, The University of Western Australia. University of Western Australia, Perth. Deryakulu, D. (2000). Yapıcı Öğrenme. Sınıfta Demokrasi. Editör: Şimşek, A. (sayfa: 53-77) Ankara: Eğitim Sen Yayınları. [Constructive leraning. Democracy in schoolroom. In:Simsek, A. Editor. (p:53–77). Ankara.]. Gibbs, G. (1992). Assessing More Students. Oxford Brookes University, Oxford. Giles, J., Ryan, Daniel A.J., Belliveav, G., De Freitas, E., Casy, R. (2006). Teaching Style and Learning in a Quantitative Classroom (EJ74429). Active Learning in Higher Education: The Journal of the Institute for Learning and Teaching. 7 (3), 213–225.
  3. Hannafin M.J. and Land S.M. (1997). The Foundations and Assumptions of Technology Enhanced Student-Centered Learning Environments, Instructional Science 25 (3), 167–202.
  4. Isman, A. (2005). Ogretim Teknolojileri ve Materyal Gelistirme. II. baskı Sempati. Ankara. [Teaching Technology and Material Development. Ankara.]. Katz, R.N. (1999). Dancing with the devil: Information technology and the new competition in higher education. Jossey Bass, San Francisco. Lee, Min-Hsien and Tsai, Chin-Chung (2005). Exploring High School Students’ and Teachers’ Preferences toward the Construcctivist Internet-based Learning Environments İn Taiwan. Educational Studies, 31 (2), 149-167. Means, (1994). Introduction: Using Technology to Advance Educational Goals. In: B. Means, Editor, Technology and Education Reform: The Reality Behind The Promise, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco. Oblinger, D. G., and Maruyama M. K. (1996).
  5. Distributed Learning. Boulder, CO: Cause Professional Paper Series, 14. Ozcelik, D. Ali. (1989). Test Hazırlama Kılavuzu. İkinci Baskı. Ankara: OSYM Egitim Yayinlari 5. [Test Preparation Guide. Ankara:OSYM press.]. Ozdamar, K. (2002). Paket Programlari ile Istatiksel Veri Analizi I. 4. baskı. Eskisehir: Kaan Kitabevi. [Statistical Data Analysis with Package. Eskişehir]. Peng, Hsinyi; Tsai, Chin-Chung; Wu, Ying-Tien. (2006). Universi