KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / The Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education / 2009 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 1

The effectivenes of online and off line word of mouth messages on traditional course choice at tertiary level

N. Serdar SEVER
Sayfa
210–222
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Perhaps the most peculiar finding of the study is senior students are perceived as the most common source of information, and their experiences often seen as a point of reference in choosing a course.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This study aims to explain how bachelor of communications students who are enrolled to various courses at Anadolu University value word-of-mouth messages in making a course decision.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:As elective course numbers increase, students look for alternative avenues and types of information to be sure of making the best possible course selection.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Perhaps the most peculiar finding of the study is senior students are perceived as the most common source of information, and their experiences often seen as a point of reference in choosing a course.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

This study aims to explain how bachelor of communications students who are enrolled to various courses at Anadolu University value word-of-mouth messages in making a course decision. Use of WOM as a marketing tool in tertiary teaching is not a common practice. As elective course numbers increase, students look for alternative avenues and types of information to be sure of making the best possible course selection. The findings of this study indicate that instructors‘ previous experiences are not as important as their in-class performances. Another interesting finding of the study is although participants are prone to use internet resources as sources of information; they value the use of computer-mediated and enhanced technologies in teaching. Perhaps the most peculiar finding of the study is senior students are perceived as the most common source of information, and their experiences often seen as a point of reference in choosing a course.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

SEVER, N. S. (2009). The effectivenes of online and off line word of mouth messages on traditional course choice at tertiary level. The Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 1, 210–222. https://ajindex.com/articles/362066

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (14)

  1. Aaker, D., Kumar, V., and Day, G.S. (2004). Marketing Research (8th Ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Addis, M. (2005). New Technologies and Cultural Consumption - Edutainment is Born!. European Journal of Marketing, 39 (7/8), 729-736.
  2. Anderson, N. H. (1965). Averaging versus Adding as a Stimulus Combination Rule in Impression Formation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2, 1−9. Arndt, J. (1968). Selective Process in Word-of-Mouth. Journal of Advertising Research, 4, 291-295.
  3. Bansal, H. S., and Voyer, P. A. (2000). Word-of-Mouth Processes within a Service Purchase Decision Context. Journal of Service Research, 5 (3), 77-166.
  4. Bone, P.F. (1995). Word-of-Mouth Effects on Short-Term and Long-Term Product Judgments. Journal of Busisness Research, 32, 213–23.
  5. Borgida, E., and Nisbett, R. E. (1977). The differential impact of abstract vs. concrete information on decisions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 7, 258-271.
  6. Brown, T. J., Barry, T. E., Dacin, P. A., and Gunst, R. F. (2005). Spreading the Word: Investigating Antedecents of Consumers‘ Positive Word-of-Mouth Intentions and Behaviors in a Retailing Context. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 33, 123-138.
  7. Brown, J. J. and Reingen, P. H. (1987). Social Ties and Word-of-Mouth Referral Behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 14, 350-362.
  8. Burzyunski, M. H., and Bayer, D., D. J. (1977). The Effect of Positive and Negative Prior Information on Motion Picture Appreciation. Journal of Social Psychology, 101, 215-218.
  9. Bytwerk, R. L. (2005). The Argument for Genocide in Nazi propaganda. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 91, 37-62.
  10. Calder, B. (1977). Focus Groups and the Nature of Qualitative Marketing Research. Journal of Marketing Research, 14, 353–364.
  11. Carl, W. J. (2006). What‘s All the Buss About? Everyday Communication and the Relational Basis of Word-of-Mouth and Buzz Marketing Practices. Management Communication Quarterly, 19, 601-634.
  12. Cadotte, Ernest R., Robert B. Woodruff, and Roger L. Jenkins. 1987. Expectations and norms in models of consumer satisfaction. Journal of Marketing Research, 14 (August): 353–64.
  13. Chevalier, J. A., and Mayzlin, D. (2003). The Effect of Word of Mouth on Sales: Online Book Reviews. Journal of Marketing Research, 44, (3), 345−354. Clapper, D. L., and Massey, A. P. (1996). Electronic Focus Groups: A Framework for Exploration. Information & Management, 30, 43–50.
  14. Clark, T., and Holmes, S. (2007). Fit for Practice? An Exploration of the Development of Newly Qua