KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Öneri Dergisi / 2007 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 27

A THREE-DIMENSIONAL APPROACH TO MANAGING SOCIAL AND INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL

Hayrettin ÖZLER
N. Derya ERGUN ÖZLER
Sayfa
201–207
Yayın Tarihi
2007-01-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Nevertheless, each of these models have comparative advantages in terms of managing social and intellectual capital.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The shift from neo-classical economic paradigm to more transactional and institutional approaches is based on the arguments which assert that markets as well as hierarchies are fallible and insufficient to solely achieve organizational and/or collective goals.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The new dimensions - network models, social, intellectual and human capital- have been included in contemporary management, political and economic literature.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Nevertheless, each of these models have comparative advantages in terms of managing social and intellectual capital.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Community · Hierarchy · Market

Özet

The shift from neo-classical economic paradigm to more transactional and institutional approaches is based on the arguments which assert that markets as well as hierarchies are fallible and insufficient to solely achieve organizational and/or collective goals. The new dimensions - network models, social, intellectual and human capital- have been included in contemporary management, political and economic literature. In line with this movement, this paper is concerned with a more holistic approach to manage social and intellectual capital; and argues in favor of linking hierarchy, market, and community relations with social capital approach to improve information sharing in organizations. The paper concludes these models of interactions have individual pros and cons, and none of them has any superiority over others. Nevertheless, each of these models have comparative advantages in terms of managing social and intellectual capital.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ÖZLER, H., ÖZLER, N. D. E. (2007). A THREE-DIMENSIONAL APPROACH TO MANAGING SOCIAL AND INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL. Öneri Dergisi, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 27, 201–207. https://ajindex.com/articles/35958

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (18)

  1. Putnam, R.D. (1995). Bowling Alone: America’s Declining Social Capital. Journal of Democracy, 6(1), 65- 78
  2. Coleman, J.S. (1990). Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge: The Bellcnap Press of Harvard University Press
  3. O’donnell, D.; O’regan, P.; Coates, B. & Kennedy, T. (2003). Humarı İnteraction: The Critical Source of Intangible Value. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 4(1), 82- 99
  4. Steward, T. A. (1998). Intellectual Capital: The New Wealth of Organizations. New York: Currency/ Doubleday
  5. Klein, A.D. (1998). The Strategic Management of Intellectual Capital: An Introduction. (Ed.: Klein, A.D.). The Strategic Management of Intellectual Capital. Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann
  6. Florida, R.; Cushing, R. & Gates, G. (2002). When Social Capital Stifles Innovation. Harvard Business Review, Special Issue Published in August: The Innovative Enterprise, 80(8), 20-23
  7. Adler, P.S. & Kwon, S. (2002). Social Capital: Prospects for a New Concept. The Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 17-40
  8. Foley, M.W. & Edwards, B. (1996). The Paradox of Civil Society. Journal of Democracy, 7(3), 38-52
  9. Ehin, C. (2000). Unleashing Intellectual Capital. Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann
  10. Quinn, J.B.; Anderson, P. & Finkelstein, S. (1998). Managing Professional Intellect: Making the Most of the Best. (Ed.: Klein, A.D.). The Strategic Management of Intellectual Capital. Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann
  11. Davenport, T.H. & Prusak, L. (2001). Working Knowledge. (Çev.: Günay, G.). İstanbul: Rota
  12. Pierce, J. L.; Kostova, T. & Dirks, K. T. (2001). Toward a Theory of Psychological Ownership in Organizations. Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 298-310
  13. Shapira, Z. (2000). Governance in Organizations: A Cognitive Perspective. Journal of Management and Organizations, 4(1-2), 53-67
  14. Krackhard, D. & Hanson J. R. (1993). Informal Networks: the Company behind the Chart. Harvard Business Review, 71(4), 104-111
  15. Graham, A.B. & Pizzo, V.G. (1998). A Question of Balance: Case Studies in Strategic Knowledge Management. (Ed.: Klein, A.D.). The Strategic Management of Intellectual Capital. Boston: Butterworth- Heinemann
  16. North, D.C. (1990). institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  17. Gargiulo, M. & Bernassi, M. (1999). The Dark Side of Social Capital. (Eds.: Leenders, A.J. & Gabbay, S.M.). Corporate Social Capital and Liability. Boston: Kluwer
  18. Suk, M. & Chwe, Y. (1999). Struc