Dergiler / Tasarım+Kuram / 2020 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 31

Exploring Urban Design Criteria For High Speed Rail (HSR) Station Through the Design Studio Experience - Case of Pendik/Turkey

Sayfa
123–139
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Research results have shown that content analysis can be a consistent and systematic method in guiding designs in the interface of architectural and urban design project topics.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:In recent years, the application of modern transportation modes to the current routes changes the urban layout.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Pendik, a large district on the Southern Istanbul periphery; the recent application of HSR Station has started to transform its centre into an intercity transportation node since its opening in 2013.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Research results have shown that content analysis can be a consistent and systematic method in guiding designs in the interface of architectural and urban design project topics.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2013 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

In recent years, the application of modern transportation modes to the current routes changes the urban layout. As a part of these transformation modes, the HSR applications promise various transformations on the urban space. In this context, rearrangements of axes, the facilities on these axes and the urban space in the surrounding of these facilities put forward an important design problem. Pendik, a large district on the Southern Istanbul periphery; the recent application of HSR Station has started to transform its centre into an intercity transportation node since its opening in 2013. In accordance with the new role, reorganization of HSR hub and its surroundings provides an experimental teaching in the design studio. Due to the exploratory nature of Architectural Design Studio, the content analysis approach is conducted. The integration of the learning experience in the urban design scale was crucial. The reports collected systematically from the students during the semester were coded with respect to content analysis. Both the final design decisions’ and the field-specific evaluations’ levels of relevance with the literature were interpreted. Among the design criteria compiled from the literature; security, connections between places, pedestrian’s ability to use the space easily, diversity of activities and users, and integration of urban texture with the HSR station have emerged for the project site. Research results have shown that content analysis can be a consistent and systematic method in guiding designs in the interface of architectural and urban design project topics.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

GÜNEY, S. Ö., ÖZTAŞ, S. K., SALİHOĞLU, T. (2020). Exploring Urban Design Criteria For High Speed Rail (HSR) Station Through the Design Studio Experience - Case of Pendik/Turkey. Tasarım+Kuram, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 31, 123–139. https://ajindex.com/articles/359068

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (11)

  1. Akıncıtürk, N., Erbil, Y., & Yücel, Ç. (2011). Cooperative Learning in Architectural Design Studio. Uludağ University Journal of the Faculty of Engineering, 16(2), 35-43.
  2. Albalate, D., & Bel, G. (2012). The Economics and Politics of High-Speed Rail, Lessons from Experiences Abroad. USA: Lexington Books. Aydınlı, S. & Avcı, O. (2010). Relational Thinking that Enhance the Critical Thinking: A studio Case Based on Discovery of Knowledge. (Eds) Spiridonidis C., Voyatzaki, M., in Educating Architects Towards Innovative Architecture, pp. 89-100, EAAE: ENHSA Publication. Blaha, P. (2013).
  3. Urban Scene Safety, Proposal of Urban Safety Assessment Method. Terra Specta Stu, Planning Studies - Central European Journal of Spatial and Landscape Planning Stu, 1, 11. California High Speed Rail Authority and Pb’s Placemaking Group. (2011).
  4. Urban Design Guidelines, California High Speed Train Project. CA. Cozens, P., & Hillier, D. (2008). The Shape of Things to Come: New Urbanism, The Grid and the Cul-De- Sac. International Planning Studies, 13(1), 51-73.
  5. Edward, T. H. (1966).
  6. The Hidden Dimension, Garden City, NY: Doubleday. Elshater, A. M., & Ibraheem, F. (2014). From Typology Concept to Smart Transportation Hub. Social and Behavioural Sciences, 153, 531-541.
  7. Fasli, M., & Hassanpour B. (2017). Rotational Critique System as A Method of Culture Change in an Architecture Design Studio: Urban Design Studio as Case Study. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 54(3), 194-205, doi: 10.1080/14703297.2016.1174142 Hammond, J.S. (1980). Learning by the Case Method (Pdf Document). Accessed through web site https:// www.study.net/sample/pdf/Learning_by_the_ Case_Method.pdf in 12.10.2020.
  8. Inan, M., & Demir, M. (2017). Demiryolu Ulaşımı ve Türkiye’de Hızlı Tren Yatırımlarının Etkileri: Eskişehir-Konya Örneği. The Journal of International Social Sciences, 27(1), 99-120.
  9. Jacobson, J., & Forsyth, A. (2008). Seven American Tods: Good Practices for Urban Design in Transit- Oriented Development Projects. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 1 (2), 51-88.
  10. Marshall, C., & Rossman G. B. (1995). Designing Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications. Mcallister, K. (2010). Design Process - Making It Relevant for Students, Archnet-IJAR, International Journal of Architectural Research (Special Volume: Design Education: Explorations and Prospects for a Better Built Environment Ashraf M. Salama and Michael J. Crosbie - editors), 4, 76-89.
  11. Khankzad, M. (2015). Architecture Studen