Dergiler / Tarih Okulu Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 52

THE EFFECT OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ON SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOAL

Yapay Zekânın Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma Hedefleri Üzerine Etkisi

Sayfa
2246–2265
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

As a result, it has been understood that while the developers believe thatartificial intelligence will contribute mostly in the fields related to the industry andeconomy, they believe that it will make almost no contribution due to the bias problemson the gender equality side.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Artificial intelligence (AI), which was built for "a better world" motto, reveals itspotential in many fields.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Although efforts have beenmade to integrate artificial intelligence into the sustainability field, the main limitation isabout the AI researcher's, developer's point of view.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:As a result, it has been understood that while the developers believe thatartificial intelligence will contribute mostly in the fields related to the industry andeconomy, they believe that it will make almost no contribution due to the bias problemson the gender equality side.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Artificial intelligence (AI), which was built for "a better world" motto, reveals itspotential in many fields. Despite of such good intension, results of AI systems causedbias, and sharpened the social prejudices. Besides in order to create such powerful AIsystems and unbiased machines, the massive data collected, storaged, processed, alsocaused high energy consumption, ecological degradation. Although efforts have beenmade to integrate artificial intelligence into the sustainability field, the main limitation isabout the AI researcher's, developer's point of view. In this study, revealing thecontribution of artificial intelligence to the Sustainable Development Goals is aimed. Atthis point, data were collected using the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) from 30individuals who were trained and worked as a developer in the field of artificialintelligence. As a result, it has been understood that while the developers believe thatartificial intelligence will contribute mostly in the fields related to the industry andeconomy, they believe that it will make almost no contribution due to the bias problemson the gender equality side.

Abstract

Daha iyi bir dünya sloganı ile geliştirilen yapay zekâ, pek çok alanda potansiyeli ortaya koymaktadır. Ancak bu iyi niyete rağmen yapay zekâ tabanlı sistemler önyargı, yanılgı, sapmaya neden olmakta ve toplumsal önyargıları keskinleştirmektedir. Daha kuvvetli yapay zeka tabanlı sistemler, önyargısız makineler oluşturmak için toplanan işlenen depolanan yüksek yığınlı veriler ise yüksek enerji sarfıyatı, ekolojik bozulmalara yol açmaktadır. Yapay zekanın sürdürülebilirlik alanına entegre edilmesine yönelik tüm çalışmalara rağmen, temel kısıt geliştiricinin bakış açısıdır. Bu çalışmada sürdürülebilir Kalkınma Amaçları’na yapay zekânın katkısının nasıl gerçekleştiği araştırılmıştır. Bu noktada yapay zekâ alanında geliştirici olarak çalışan, eğitim almış 30 bireyden analitik hiyerarşi prosesi kullanılarak veri toplanmıştır. Sonuç olarak geliştiriciler yapay zekânın en çok endüstri, ekonomi ile ilgili alanlarda katkı yapacağına inanırken, toplumsal cinsiyet eşitliği tarafında önyargı, yanılgı ve sapma sorunları nedeniyle yok denecek kadar az katkı yapacağına inandıkları anlaşılmıştır.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ÖZDEMİR, Ş., ÖZUYAR, P., SUNDU, M. (2021). THE EFFECT OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ON SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOAL. Tarih Okulu Dergisi, Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 52, 2246–2265. https://ajindex.com/articles/356927

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (8)

  1. Angwin, J., Larson, J., Mattu, S., & Kirchner, L. (2016). Machine bias. There’s software used across the country to predict future criminals and it’s biased against blacks. ProPublica. https://www.propublica.org/article/machinebias-risk-assessments-in-criminal-sentencing, Access date: 28.02.2021.
  2. Asilomar Meeting. (2017). Asilomar AI principles. https://futureoflife.org/aiprinciples/., Access date: 28.02.2021.
  3. Biggeri, M., Clark, D. A., Ferrannini, A., & Mauro, V. (2019). Tracking the SDGs in an ‘integrated’ manner: A proposal for a new index to capture synergies and trade-offs between and within goals. World Development, 122, 628– 647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.05.022
  4. Buolamwini, J., & Gebru, T. (2018). Gender shades: intersectional accuracy disparities in commercial gender classification. In Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency, 77–91.
  5. Brundtland, G. (1987). Report of the world commission on environment and development: Our common future. United Nations General Assembly Document A/42/427. Carson, R., Darling, L., Darling, L., Houghton Mifflin Company, & Riverside Press (Cambridge, Mass.) (1962).
  6. Silent spring. Elkington, J. (2013). Enter the triple bottom line. The Triple Bottom Line: Does it All Add Up, 1(1986), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781849773348
  7. Floridi, L., Cowls, J., Beltrametti, M., Chatila, R., Chazerand, P., Dignum, V., Luetge, C., Madelin, R., Pagallo, U., Rossi, F., & et al. (2018). AI4People—an ethical framework for a good AI society: Opportunities, risks, principles, and recommendations. Minds and Machines, 28(4), 689– 707. Garcia, E. (2019). The Militarization of Artificial Intelligence: A Wake-Up Call for the Global South. Available at SSRN 3452323. Greene, D., Hoffmann, A.L., & Stark, L. (2019). Better, nicer, clearer, fairer: a critical assessment of the movement for ethical artificial intelligence and machine learning. In Proceedings of the 52nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Haenlein, M., & Kaplan, A. (2019) A brief history of artificial intelligence: On the past, present, and future of artificial intelligence. California Management Review, 61(4), 5-14. Kaboré, R. M. C., Solberg,E., Gates, M., & Kim,J.Y. (2018) Financing the SDGs: mobilising and using domestic resources for health and human capital. The Lancet, 392(10158), 1605-1607. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18) 32597-2.
  8. Kahneman, D., Rosenfield, A.M., Gandhi, L., & Blaser T. (2016). Noise: How to overcome the hig