Dergiler / Anatomy / 2020 / Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 1

Bibliometric analysis of articles published in Anatomy, the official publication of the Turkish Society of Anatomy and Clinical Anatomy between 2007–2018

Dergi
Anatomy
Sayfa
39–43
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Conclusion: The findings obtained in this study are thought to be important for understanding the place of the journal Anatomy and its contribution to the scientific literature in the field of anatomy.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objectives: Bibliometry is a research approach to measure and analyze the productivity of the literature in a specific area or journal.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Therefore, bibliometric analysis is significant in the evaluation of the journals.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Conclusion: The findings obtained in this study are thought to be important for understanding the place of the journal Anatomy and its contribution to the scientific literature in the field of anatomy.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2007–2018 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:anatomy · article · bibliometric analysis

Abstract

Objectives: Bibliometry is a research approach to measure and analyze the productivity of the literature in a specific area or journal. Therefore, bibliometric analysis is significant in the evaluation of the journals. In this study, we aimed to examine the articles published in Anatomy (ISSN: 1307–8798), the official publication of the Turkish Society of Anatomy and Clinical Anatomy (TSACA) between 2007–2018. Methods: The affiliations of the authors, identity, type, content and number of citations of articles published in the journal Anatomy between 2007–2018 were recorded. Descriptive statistics of the data were made. Results: Between 2007 and 2018, 214 articles were published in 12 volumes and 19 issues, the number of published articles varying by years. 101 (47.6%) of 214 articles were cited. Forty four articles (20.56%) were prepared by a single author, and 170 (79.44%) articles by multiple authors. Conclusion: The findings obtained in this study are thought to be important for understanding the place of the journal Anatomy and its contribution to the scientific literature in the field of anatomy.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ADANIR, S., BAHŞİ, İ., KERVANCIOĞLU, P., ORHAN, M., CİHAN, Ö. (2020). Bibliometric analysis of articles published in Anatomy, the official publication of the Turkish Society of Anatomy and Clinical Anatomy between 2007–2018. Anatomy, Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 1, 39–43. https://ajindex.com/articles/355547

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (9)

  1. Anatomy journal official website. [Internet]. [Retrieved on December 12, 2019]. IFAA official website. [Internet]. [Retrieved on February 24, 2020]. Available from: www.ifaa.net/committees/scientific-publications-ficsp/ Pritchard A. Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics. Journal of Documentation 1969;25:348-9. Dhiman A. Ethnobotany Journal: A ten year bibliometric study. IASLIC Bulletin 2000;45:177-82.
  2. Ullah M, Butt IF, Haroon M. The Journal of Ayub Medical College: a 10-year bibliometric study. Health Info Libr J 2008;25:116-24.
  3. Abdi A, Idris N, Alguliyev RM, Aliguliyev RM. Bibliometric analysis of IP&M Journal. Journal of Scientometric Research 2018;7:54-62.
  4. Roy SB, Basak M. Journal of Documentation: a bibliometric study. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal) 2013:945. Coronado RA, Wurtzel WA, Simon CB, Riddle DL, George SZ. Content and bibliometric analysis of articles published in the Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2011;41:920-31.
  5. Ahmed I, Ullah M. A 10-year bibliometric study of Pakistan Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal): 2128. Hu J, Ma Y, Zhang L, Gan F, Ho YS. A historical review and bibliometric analysis of research on lead in drinking water field from 1991 to 2007. Sci Total Environ 2010;408:1738-44.
  6. Chuang KY, Chuang YC, Ho M, Ho YS. Bibliometric analysis of public health research in Africa: the overall trend and regional comparisons. South African Journal of Science 2011;107:54-9.
  7. Maharana RK, Sethi BB. A bibliometric analysis of the research output of Sambalpur University's publication in ISI Web of Science during 2007-11. Library Philosophy and Practice 2013;15. Kumar M. Library Herald journal: a bibliometric study. Journal of Education & Social Policy 2014;1:123-34.
  8. Nasir S, Ahmed J, Asrar M, Gilani AH. A bibliometric analysis of pharmacy/pharmacology research in Pakistan. International Journal of Pharmacology. 2015;11:766-72. Thompson DF. Bibliometric analysis of pharmacology publications in the united states: a state-level evaluation. Journal of Scientometric Research 2018;7:167-72. Petekkaya E. The most cited articles in anatomy: an update study. Biomedical Journal of Scientific & Technical Research 2019;22:16486-94.
  9. Wing L, Massoud TF. Trends in performance indicators of neuroimaging anatomy research publications: a bibliometric study of major neuroradiology journal output over four