Dergiler / A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 3

Layering in representation: Rethinking architectural representation through Perry Kulper’s works

Sayfa
141–154
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Selected worksand their architectural narratives are then discussed based on these dual readings.Depending on outcomes, it can be suggested that although layered representationsproduce singularities through personal knowledge, these singularities include/carry the possibility of creating alternative spatial worlds and atmospheres inarchitecture.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:“Layered representations” in architecture create a ‘personal’ language with theircomplex structures and can be accepted as creative tools for thinking and designingarchitectural space in a performative way.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:These kinds of multiple/interwovenrepresentations that are produced by the overlapping and manipulation of bothdesign tools and ideas are valuable in the context of their original narrativesand present an alternative approach in the dialog with space by expanding theboundaries of architectural representations.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Selected worksand their architectural narratives are then discussed based on these dual readings.Depending on outcomes, it can be suggested that although layered representationsproduce singularities through personal knowledge, these singularities include/carry the possibility of creating alternative spatial worlds and atmospheres inarchitecture.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

“Layered representations” in architecture create a ‘personal’ language with theircomplex structures and can be accepted as creative tools for thinking and designingarchitectural space in a performative way. These kinds of multiple/interwovenrepresentations that are produced by the overlapping and manipulation of bothdesign tools and ideas are valuable in the context of their original narrativesand present an alternative approach in the dialog with space by expanding theboundaries of architectural representations. This study aims to focus on thesenew forms of architectural representation and discusses them through “personalknowledgetheory”. Within the scope of the study, some of Perry Kulper’s worksare chosen and examined as case-studies. Dual readings, which are discussedthrough the concepts of ‘design thinking and designing act’, as well as ‘explicitand tacit knowledge’, constitute the methodology of this study. Selected worksand their architectural narratives are then discussed based on these dual readings.Depending on outcomes, it can be suggested that although layered representationsproduce singularities through personal knowledge, these singularities include/carry the possibility of creating alternative spatial worlds and atmospheres inarchitecture.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ASAR, H., ÇEBİ, P. D. (2020). Layering in representation: Rethinking architectural representation through Perry Kulper’s works. A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 3, 141–154. https://ajindex.com/articles/354958

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (11)

  1. Asar, H., & Dursun Çebi, P. (2018). Mimari temsilde kişisel anlatılar: Karışık yapılı temsiller ve dillendirdikleri, Uluslararası Hakemli Tasarım ve Mimarlık Dergisi, Sayı 14, 118-143.
  2. Aydınlı, S., & Kürtüncü, B. (2014). Paralaks oda. Yapı Endüstri Merkezi Yayınları.
  3. Bolt, B. (2004). Art beyond representation: The performative power of the image. I.B. Tauris & Co.Ltd. Castle, H. (2014). Canny communication in architecture in the age of ‘messy media’. Edge Condition, (2) 16- 23. Cook, S. D., & Brown, J. S. (1999). Bridging epistemologies: The generative dance between organizational knowledge and organizational knowing. Organization Science, 10 (4), 381- 400. Edwards, B. (2008). Understanding architecture through drawing (2nd ed.). Taylor & Francis. Grant, K. A. (2007). Tacit knowledge revisited– we can still learn from Polanyi, The Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, 5 (2), 173–180. Gürer, T. K. (2004). Bir paradigma olarak mimari temsilin i̇ncelenmesi [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Istanbul Technical University. Heidegger, M. (1971). The Thing (A. Hofstader, Trans.), In Poetry, Language, Thought, (pp. 163-184). New York: Harper & Row. Herbert, D. M. (1988). Study drawings in architectural design: Their properties as a graphic medium. Journal of Architectural Education, 41 (2), 26-38.
  4. Howells, J. (1996). Tacit knowledge, innovation and technology transfer. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 8 (2), 91-106.
  5. Kanekar, A. (2015). Architecture’s pretexts: Spaces of translation. Routledge. Kulper, P. (2005). Representing beyond the surface. Drawn out: Arcca- Aiacc Design Awards Issue, 5 (3), 16-19.
  6. Kulper, P. (2009). Alternating (the) currencies. Journal of Architectural Education, 62(4), 56- 63. https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1531-314X.2009.1004.x Kulper, P. (2013). A world below. Architectural Design, 83 (5), 56-63.
  7. Kulper, P. (2015). Space oddities. Dichotomy 21: ODDS, Heath Press,
  8. Royal Oak, MI, 10-28.
  9. Kulper, P. (2016, November 10). Architectural representation masterclass [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube. com/watch?v=OgZGUzkW_5k Kulper, P. (2017, October 7). Perry Kulper work. Issuu. https://issuu.com/ perrykulper/docs/pkulper Kulper, P. (2018, November 7). Perry Kulper: International lecture series [Video]. Vimeo. https://vimeo. com/300533258 Kulper, P. (2019). Avant‐Garde legacies: A spirited flâneur. Architectural Design, 89 (4), 62-69.
  10. Lawson, B. (2004).
  11. What designers know, Elsevier. Lawson, B. (2005). How designers think: