Dergiler / A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 3

Socio-spatial vulnerability and dilapidated abandoned buildings (DABs) through the lens of spatial liminality: A case study in Iran

Sayfa
61–78
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

This study allows practitioners,policymakers and academicians to comprehend the revitalisation of historiccities through the lens of spatial liminality and this, in turn, opens up discussionon how urban regeneration methods can inform socio-spatial governingcontext to move historic cities, out of spatial liminality.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This article explores the association between socio-spatial vulnerability anddilapidated-abandoned buildings (DABs) through the lens of spatial liminalityin historic Iranian cities.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:It deliberates how DABs are accompanied by severaldeleterious effects, created as a result of modern socio-spatial transformation.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:This study allows practitioners,policymakers and academicians to comprehend the revitalisation of historiccities through the lens of spatial liminality and this, in turn, opens up discussionon how urban regeneration methods can inform socio-spatial governingcontext to move historic cities, out of spatial liminality.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

This article explores the association between socio-spatial vulnerability anddilapidated-abandoned buildings (DABs) through the lens of spatial liminalityin historic Iranian cities. It deliberates how DABs are accompanied by severaldeleterious effects, created as a result of modern socio-spatial transformation. Aninterdisciplinary approach was employed in this study, which recognises liminalityas a condition of socio-spatial vulnerability applicable to historic cities. Inthis case, spatial liminality in historic cities has become associated with the influxof non-local disadvantaged residents who compete for cheaper housing optionswhile remaining in a state of limbo. The study is quantitative in nature andconsists of a questionnaire survey and on-site observation. The investigation wasconducted in twelve urban blocks, located in two significant historic cities: Yazdand Kashan. Results demonstrate a significant association between the extent ofDABs, the overall distribution of liminal refugees and the proportion of refugeesettlements, almost in all sample blocks. Such spatial liminality accompanied bythe accumulation of refugees, indicating DABs as liminal urban fabrics that needto be re-utilised while maintaining their heritage value. This study allows practitioners,policymakers and academicians to comprehend the revitalisation of historiccities through the lens of spatial liminality and this, in turn, opens up discussionon how urban regeneration methods can inform socio-spatial governingcontext to move historic cities, out of spatial liminality.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

TAVAKOLİ, H., WESTBROOK, N., SHARIFİ, E., MARZBALİ, M. H. (2020). Socio-spatial vulnerability and dilapidated abandoned buildings (DABs) through the lens of spatial liminality: A case study in Iran. A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 3, 61–78. https://ajindex.com/articles/354953

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (10)

  1. Andalib, A. (2010).
  2. Osul-I Nosazi Shahri, Ruykard-i Nou Be Bafthay-i Farsudeh [Principles for Urban Renovation, a New Approach to Deteriorated Areas], Tehran: Azarakhsh. Balbo, M. (2012).
  3. The Medina, The Restoration and Conservation of Historic Islamic Cities. London: I.B.Tauris. Behzadfar, M. (2012). Strategic Plan for Historic Yazd (Volumes 1 to 5). Tehran: Ministry for Roads and Urban Development. Bianca, S. (2000). Urban Form in the Arab World: Past and Present, London: Thames & Hudson. Curtis, G. E., & Hooglund, E. (2008). Iran: A Country Study, Washington, D.C.: Federal Research Division, Library of Congress. Darity, W. A. (2008). International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, Detroit: Thomson/Gale. Doratli, N. (2005). Revitalising historic urban quarters: A model for determining the most relevant strategic approach. European Planning Studies, 13, 749-772
  4. Edwards, J. E., Thomas, M.D., Rosenfeld, P., & Booth-Kewley, S. (1997). How To Conduct Organizational Surveys: A Step-by-Step Guide, Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications. Ehlers, E., & Floor, W. (1993). Urban change in Iran, 1920--1941. Iranian Studies, 26, 251-275.
  5. Faghih, N. (1976). Rehabilitation in Dardasht. Architectural Review, Isfahan Special Issue 159, 315-319.
  6. Güler, K. & Kâhya, Y. (2019). Developing an approach for conservation of abandoned rural settlements in Turkey. ITU J Faculty Arch, 16(1), 97-115.
  7. Gür, E. A. & Heidari, N. (2019). Challenge of identity in the urban transformation process: The case of Celiktepe, Istanbul. ITU J Faculty Arch, 16(1), 127-144.
  8. Habibi, K. (2010). Behsazi va Nosazi-e Bafthaye-i Kohane-i Shahri [Urban Rehabilitation and Renovation in the Old Textures], Tehran: Nashri Entekhab. Habibi, M. (2005).
  9. Az Shar Ta Shahr, Tahlili Tarikhi az mafhum-i shahr va simay-i kalbodi-i an tafakor-o Tassor, Tehran: Daneshgah-i-Tehran. Hakim, B. S. (1986). Arabic-Islamic Cities, buildings and Planning Principles, London: Kegan Paul International. Hanachi, P., & Fadaei Nezhad, S. (2019). Barresi va Tabyyin-i Seir-i Tahavol-i Siasatha Va Barnamehay-Ii- Hefazat Az Miras-i Farhangi 1357-1391 [Conservation and development policies of historic areas in Iran 1979-2013]. Motaleate-i Memari-i Iran, 5, pp. 22-36. ICOMOS, (1993). New Zealand Charter for the Conservation of Places of Cultural Heritage Value. [Online]. Available: https://www.icomos. org/charters/ICOMOS_NZ_Charter_ 2010_FINAL_11_Oct_2010.pdf [Accessed June 2019]
  10. Izadi, M. (2008). Study on City Centre Regeneration: A compa