Dergiler / Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica / 2012 / Cilt: 46 - Sayı: 1

Early results of HemiCAP® resurfacing implant

Sayfa
17–21
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

However, studies over a longer period involving more patients would be beneficial in terms of defining and reviewing the stability of the implant and any innovations in the treatment strategy for HR.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: Metallic implants in the first metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint have been used for many years in the treatment of hallux rigidus (HR).
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Methods: A total of 27 toes of 25 patients with MTP arthritis of the great toe were treated with an Arthrosurface® HemiCAP® resurfacing implant.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:However, studies over a longer period involving more patients would be beneficial in terms of defining and reviewing the stability of the implant and any innovations in the treatment strategy for HR.
🔬Tür:Literatür & Derleme Çalışması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Objective: Metallic implants in the first metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint have been used for many years in the treatment of hallux rigidus (HR). The HemiCAP® prosthesis is the first implant used for resurfacing the metatarsal head in HR treatment. The aim of our study was toevaluate the early results of the HemiCAP® prosthesis for the treatment of HR. Methods: A total of 27 toes of 25 patients with MTP arthritis of the great toe were treated with an Arthrosurface® HemiCAP® resurfacing implant. The average follow-up time was 37.6 (range: 30 to 43) months. All patients were evaluated clinically and radiographically. Postoperative satisfaction and function were scored according to the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score. Pain was assessed with the use of a visual analogue scale (VAS) ranging from 0 to 10, with 0 indicating the absence of pain and 10 describing the worst pain imaginable. Results: Mean preoperative AOFAS score improved from 40.94 (range: 25 to 63) to 85.1 (range: 54 to 98) at the final follow-up (p<0.0001). Preoperative average VAS pain scores improved from 8.30 preoperatively to 2.05 at the final follow-up (p<0.0001). The average MTP joint range of motion (ROM) the improved from 14.36 degrees preoperatively to 54.38 degrees at the final follow-up. No radiologic loosening or osteolysis was observed in patients with HemiCAP® implant. Conclusion: The early results of the HemiCAP® implant on the metatarsal head are promising. However, studies over a longer period involving more patients would be beneficial in terms of defining and reviewing the stability of the implant and any innovations in the treatment strategy for HR.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ASLAN, H., ÇITAK, M., GÖNEN, E. B., DUMAN, E., AYDIN, E., ATEŞ, Y. (2012). Early results of HemiCAP® resurfacing implant. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, Cilt: 46 - Sayı: 1, 17–21. https://ajindex.com/articles/354696

Kaynakça (18)

  1. Ettl V, Radke S, Gaertner M, Walther M. Arthrodesis in the treatment of hallux rigidus. Int Orthop 2003;27:382-5
  2. Carpenter B, Smith J, Motley T, Garrett A. Surgical treatment of hallux rigidus using a metatarsal head resurfacing implant: mid-term follow-up. J Foot Ankle Surg 2010;49:321- 5
  3. Coughlin MJ, Shurnas PS. Hallux rigidus. Grading and longterm results of operative treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003;85-A:2072-88
  4. Brewster M, McArthur J, Mauffrey C, Lewis AC, Hull P, Ramos J. Moje first metatarsophalangeal replacement – a case series with functional outcomes using the AOFAS-HMI score. J Foot Ankle Surg 2010;49:37-42
  5. Mann RA, Clanton TO. Hallux rigidus: treatment by cheilectomy. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1988;70:400-6
  6. Becher C,Kilger R, Thermann H. Results of cheilectomy and additional microfracture technique for the treatment of hallux rigidus. Foot Ankle Surg 2005;3:155-60
  7. Sorbie C, Saunders GA. Hemiarthroplasty in the treatment of hallux rigidus. Foot Ankle Int 2008;29:273-81
  8. Sullivan MR. Hallux rigidus: MTP implant arthroplasty. Foot Ankle Clin 2009;14:33-42
  9. Fitzgerald JA, Wilkinson JM. Arthrodesis of the metatarsophalangeal joint of the great toe. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1981;(157):70-7
  10. Faraj A. Management of hallux rigidus. Curr Orthop 2008;22: 422-7
  11. Brewster M. Does total joint replacement or arthrodesis of the first metatarsophalangeal joint yield better functional results? A systematic review of the literature. J Foot Ankle Surg 2010; 49:546-52
  12. Cook E, Cook J, Rosenblum B, Landsman A, Giurini J, Basile P. Meta-analysis of first metatarsophalangeal joint implant arthroplasty. J Foot Ankle Surg 2009;48:180-90
  13. Hasselman CT, Shields N. Resurfacing of the first metatarsal head in the treatment of hallux rigidus. Tech Foot Ankle Surg 2008;7:31-40
  14. Coughlin MJ, Shurnas PS. Hallux rigidus: demographics, etiology, and radiographic assessment. Foot Ankle Int 2003;24: 731-43
  15. Roukis TS. Outcome following autogenous soft tissue interpositional arthroplasty for end-stage hallux rigidus: a systematic review. J Foot Ankle Surg 2010;49:475-8
  16. Giza E, Sullivan M, Ocel D, Lundeen G, Mitchell M, Frizzell L. First metatarsophalangeal hemiarthroplasty for hallux rigidus. Int Orthop 2010;34:1193-8
  17. Olms K, Dietze A. Replacement arthroplasty for hallux rigidus. 21 patients with a 2-year follow-up. Int Orthop 1999;23:240-3
  18. Arbuthnot JE, Cheung G, Balain B, Denehey T, Higgins G, Trevett MC. Replacem